Consecutive Case Series of Healed Single-Molar Sites Immediately Restored with Wide-Diameter Implants: A 1-Year Evaluation
Introduction. To evaluate outcomes of wide-diameter (6 mm) implants immediately provisionalized with cement-retained single crowns in posterior molar sites. Materials and Methods. Forty-eight consecutive patients received a total of 53 moderately rough-surface, 6 mm diameter implants in healed sites...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2016-01-01
|
| Series: | International Journal of Dentistry |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/5645892 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832555434928504832 |
|---|---|
| author | Hadi Antoun Pierre Cherfane Bouchra Sojod |
| author_facet | Hadi Antoun Pierre Cherfane Bouchra Sojod |
| author_sort | Hadi Antoun |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Introduction. To evaluate outcomes of wide-diameter (6 mm) implants immediately provisionalized with cement-retained single crowns in posterior molar sites. Materials and Methods. Forty-eight consecutive patients received a total of 53 moderately rough-surface, 6 mm diameter implants in healed sites. All implants were immediately provisionalized with a cement-retained provisional crown. Final prosthesis with cement-retained porcelain fused to metal crowns was delivered 3–6 months later. Patients were followed up for 1 year. Outcome measures were implant failures and success rate, complications, marginal bone levels, bone level changes, papilla index, bleeding on probing, and inflammation. Results. One patient was lost to follow-up. At one year, the implant survival and success rate were 98.1%. The mean marginal bone loss after 1 year was −0.17±1.84 mm. Ideal papilla score was recorded at 83.8% of the sites. More than 95.6% of the sites showed no bleeding or inflammation. No procedure-related or device-related adverse events were reported. Conclusion. Wide-diameter (6 mm) implants can safely and successfully replace single posterior molars. Longer follow-up studies are necessary to evaluate the long-term success of these implants. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-d690818b99f549fb98edaa81eabb5bd5 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1687-8728 1687-8736 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2016-01-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | International Journal of Dentistry |
| spelling | doaj-art-d690818b99f549fb98edaa81eabb5bd52025-02-03T05:48:17ZengWileyInternational Journal of Dentistry1687-87281687-87362016-01-01201610.1155/2016/56458925645892Consecutive Case Series of Healed Single-Molar Sites Immediately Restored with Wide-Diameter Implants: A 1-Year EvaluationHadi Antoun0Pierre Cherfane1Bouchra Sojod2Training Institute for Advanced Implant Surgery (IFCIA), 75017 Paris, FranceDepartment of Oral Surgery and Oral Implantology, School of Dentistry, University of Paris 7, 75013 Paris, FranceGroupe Hospitalier Pitie-Salpetriere, 47-83 Boulevard de l’Hôpital, 75013 Paris, FranceIntroduction. To evaluate outcomes of wide-diameter (6 mm) implants immediately provisionalized with cement-retained single crowns in posterior molar sites. Materials and Methods. Forty-eight consecutive patients received a total of 53 moderately rough-surface, 6 mm diameter implants in healed sites. All implants were immediately provisionalized with a cement-retained provisional crown. Final prosthesis with cement-retained porcelain fused to metal crowns was delivered 3–6 months later. Patients were followed up for 1 year. Outcome measures were implant failures and success rate, complications, marginal bone levels, bone level changes, papilla index, bleeding on probing, and inflammation. Results. One patient was lost to follow-up. At one year, the implant survival and success rate were 98.1%. The mean marginal bone loss after 1 year was −0.17±1.84 mm. Ideal papilla score was recorded at 83.8% of the sites. More than 95.6% of the sites showed no bleeding or inflammation. No procedure-related or device-related adverse events were reported. Conclusion. Wide-diameter (6 mm) implants can safely and successfully replace single posterior molars. Longer follow-up studies are necessary to evaluate the long-term success of these implants.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/5645892 |
| spellingShingle | Hadi Antoun Pierre Cherfane Bouchra Sojod Consecutive Case Series of Healed Single-Molar Sites Immediately Restored with Wide-Diameter Implants: A 1-Year Evaluation International Journal of Dentistry |
| title | Consecutive Case Series of Healed Single-Molar Sites Immediately Restored with Wide-Diameter Implants: A 1-Year Evaluation |
| title_full | Consecutive Case Series of Healed Single-Molar Sites Immediately Restored with Wide-Diameter Implants: A 1-Year Evaluation |
| title_fullStr | Consecutive Case Series of Healed Single-Molar Sites Immediately Restored with Wide-Diameter Implants: A 1-Year Evaluation |
| title_full_unstemmed | Consecutive Case Series of Healed Single-Molar Sites Immediately Restored with Wide-Diameter Implants: A 1-Year Evaluation |
| title_short | Consecutive Case Series of Healed Single-Molar Sites Immediately Restored with Wide-Diameter Implants: A 1-Year Evaluation |
| title_sort | consecutive case series of healed single molar sites immediately restored with wide diameter implants a 1 year evaluation |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/5645892 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT hadiantoun consecutivecaseseriesofhealedsinglemolarsitesimmediatelyrestoredwithwidediameterimplantsa1yearevaluation AT pierrecherfane consecutivecaseseriesofhealedsinglemolarsitesimmediatelyrestoredwithwidediameterimplantsa1yearevaluation AT bouchrasojod consecutivecaseseriesofhealedsinglemolarsitesimmediatelyrestoredwithwidediameterimplantsa1yearevaluation |