Association between socioeconomic factors and cancer risk: a population cohort study in Scotland (1991-2006).

<h4>Background</h4>Lung and upper aero-digestive tract (UADT) cancer risk are associated with low socioeconomic circumstances and routinely measured using area socioeconomic indices. We investigated effect of country of birth, marital status, one area deprivation measure and individual s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Katharine H Sharpe, Alex D McMahon, Gillian M Raab, David H Brewster, David I Conway
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0089513&type=printable
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849720359818887168
author Katharine H Sharpe
Alex D McMahon
Gillian M Raab
David H Brewster
David I Conway
author_facet Katharine H Sharpe
Alex D McMahon
Gillian M Raab
David H Brewster
David I Conway
author_sort Katharine H Sharpe
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Background</h4>Lung and upper aero-digestive tract (UADT) cancer risk are associated with low socioeconomic circumstances and routinely measured using area socioeconomic indices. We investigated effect of country of birth, marital status, one area deprivation measure and individual socioeconomic variables (economic activity, education, occupational social class, car ownership, household tenure) on risk associated with lung, UADT and all cancer combined (excluding non melanoma skin cancer).<h4>Methods</h4>We linked Scottish Longitudinal Study and Scottish Cancer Registry to follow 203,658 cohort members aged 15+ years from 1991-2006. Relative risks (RR) were calculated using Poisson regression models by sex offset for person-years of follow-up.<h4>Results</h4>21,832 first primary tumours (including 3,505 lung, 1,206 UADT) were diagnosed. Regardless of cancer, economically inactivity (versus activity) was associated with increased risk (male: RR 1.14, 95% CI 1.10-1.18; female: RR 1.06, 95% CI 1.02-1.11). For lung cancer, area deprivation remained significant after full adjustment suggesting the area deprivation cannot be fully explained by individual variables. No or non degree qualification (versus degree) was associated with increased lung risk; likewise for UADT risk (females only). Occupational social class associations were most pronounced and elevated for UADT risk. No car access (versus ownership) was associated with increased risk (excluding all cancer risk, males). Renting (versus home ownership) was associated with increased lung cancer risk, UADT cancer risk (males only) and all cancer risk (females only). Regardless of cancer group, elevated risk was associated with no education and living in deprived areas.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Different and independent socioeconomic variables are inversely associated with different cancer risks in both sexes; no one socioeconomic variable captures all aspects of socioeconomic circumstances or life course. Association of multiple socioeconomic variables is likely to reflect the complexity and multifaceted nature of deprivation as well as the various roles of these dimensions over the life course.
format Article
id doaj-art-d678196cfa254f5c9365a6380bbbb8c7
institution DOAJ
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2014-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-d678196cfa254f5c9365a6380bbbb8c72025-08-20T03:11:57ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0192e8951310.1371/journal.pone.0089513Association between socioeconomic factors and cancer risk: a population cohort study in Scotland (1991-2006).Katharine H SharpeAlex D McMahonGillian M RaabDavid H BrewsterDavid I Conway<h4>Background</h4>Lung and upper aero-digestive tract (UADT) cancer risk are associated with low socioeconomic circumstances and routinely measured using area socioeconomic indices. We investigated effect of country of birth, marital status, one area deprivation measure and individual socioeconomic variables (economic activity, education, occupational social class, car ownership, household tenure) on risk associated with lung, UADT and all cancer combined (excluding non melanoma skin cancer).<h4>Methods</h4>We linked Scottish Longitudinal Study and Scottish Cancer Registry to follow 203,658 cohort members aged 15+ years from 1991-2006. Relative risks (RR) were calculated using Poisson regression models by sex offset for person-years of follow-up.<h4>Results</h4>21,832 first primary tumours (including 3,505 lung, 1,206 UADT) were diagnosed. Regardless of cancer, economically inactivity (versus activity) was associated with increased risk (male: RR 1.14, 95% CI 1.10-1.18; female: RR 1.06, 95% CI 1.02-1.11). For lung cancer, area deprivation remained significant after full adjustment suggesting the area deprivation cannot be fully explained by individual variables. No or non degree qualification (versus degree) was associated with increased lung risk; likewise for UADT risk (females only). Occupational social class associations were most pronounced and elevated for UADT risk. No car access (versus ownership) was associated with increased risk (excluding all cancer risk, males). Renting (versus home ownership) was associated with increased lung cancer risk, UADT cancer risk (males only) and all cancer risk (females only). Regardless of cancer group, elevated risk was associated with no education and living in deprived areas.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Different and independent socioeconomic variables are inversely associated with different cancer risks in both sexes; no one socioeconomic variable captures all aspects of socioeconomic circumstances or life course. Association of multiple socioeconomic variables is likely to reflect the complexity and multifaceted nature of deprivation as well as the various roles of these dimensions over the life course.https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0089513&type=printable
spellingShingle Katharine H Sharpe
Alex D McMahon
Gillian M Raab
David H Brewster
David I Conway
Association between socioeconomic factors and cancer risk: a population cohort study in Scotland (1991-2006).
PLoS ONE
title Association between socioeconomic factors and cancer risk: a population cohort study in Scotland (1991-2006).
title_full Association between socioeconomic factors and cancer risk: a population cohort study in Scotland (1991-2006).
title_fullStr Association between socioeconomic factors and cancer risk: a population cohort study in Scotland (1991-2006).
title_full_unstemmed Association between socioeconomic factors and cancer risk: a population cohort study in Scotland (1991-2006).
title_short Association between socioeconomic factors and cancer risk: a population cohort study in Scotland (1991-2006).
title_sort association between socioeconomic factors and cancer risk a population cohort study in scotland 1991 2006
url https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0089513&type=printable
work_keys_str_mv AT katharinehsharpe associationbetweensocioeconomicfactorsandcancerriskapopulationcohortstudyinscotland19912006
AT alexdmcmahon associationbetweensocioeconomicfactorsandcancerriskapopulationcohortstudyinscotland19912006
AT gillianmraab associationbetweensocioeconomicfactorsandcancerriskapopulationcohortstudyinscotland19912006
AT davidhbrewster associationbetweensocioeconomicfactorsandcancerriskapopulationcohortstudyinscotland19912006
AT davidiconway associationbetweensocioeconomicfactorsandcancerriskapopulationcohortstudyinscotland19912006