Assessing the efficacy of electrocardiogram for heart rate evaluation during newborn resuscitation at birth: a prospective observational study

Objective This study assessed the efficacy of electrocardiogram (ECG) compared to pulse oximetry (PO) in detecting heart rate (HR) during high-risk newborn resuscitation. Methods A prospective observational study was performed with high-risk delivery cases to measure the time required for HR detecti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kee Hyun Cho, Hyun Su Lee, Eun Sun Kim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Korean Society of Emergency Medicine 2025-06-01
Series:Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ceemjournal.org/upload/pdf/ceem-24-245.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849419242308370432
author Kee Hyun Cho
Hyun Su Lee
Eun Sun Kim
author_facet Kee Hyun Cho
Hyun Su Lee
Eun Sun Kim
author_sort Kee Hyun Cho
collection DOAJ
description Objective This study assessed the efficacy of electrocardiogram (ECG) compared to pulse oximetry (PO) in detecting heart rate (HR) during high-risk newborn resuscitation. Methods A prospective observational study was performed with high-risk delivery cases to measure the time required for HR detection. A conventional PO and a standard ECG monitor were used for HR assessment. Results Forty-one infants were analyzed in the study, and 11 needed resuscitation. The study population was divided according to gestational age (GA): 9 were GA <32 weeks, 28 were GA 32–35 weeks, and 4 were GA ≥36 weeks. Time from ECG placement to HR detection (median, 30 seconds; interquartile range [IQR], 20–43.5 seconds) was significantly faster than that from PO placement (median, 125 seconds; IQR, 100–175 seconds; P<0.001). Time from ECG placement to HR detection was shortest in infants with GA <32 weeks at birth (19 seconds [IQR, 11.5–30.0] for GA <32 weeks vs. 34.5 seconds [IQR, 25.0–44.3] for GA 32–35 weeks vs. 39.5 seconds [IQR, 30.0–64.8] for GA ≥36 weeks; P=0.039). Conclusion ECG effectively evaluated HR during neonatal resuscitation compared to PO. Low-GA infants who require resuscitation may benefit from HR evaluation with nearby standard ECG.
format Article
id doaj-art-d64b0a682ed94c9e9c54c4d044dea567
institution Kabale University
issn 2383-4625
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher The Korean Society of Emergency Medicine
record_format Article
series Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine
spelling doaj-art-d64b0a682ed94c9e9c54c4d044dea5672025-08-20T03:32:11ZengThe Korean Society of Emergency MedicineClinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine2383-46252025-06-0112216416810.15441/ceem.24.245576Assessing the efficacy of electrocardiogram for heart rate evaluation during newborn resuscitation at birth: a prospective observational studyKee Hyun Cho0Hyun Su Lee1Eun Sun Kim2 Department of Pediatrics, Kangwon National University Hospital, Chuncheon, Korea Department of Pediatrics, Kangwon National University Hospital, Chuncheon, Korea Department of Pediatrics, Kangwon National University Hospital, Chuncheon, KoreaObjective This study assessed the efficacy of electrocardiogram (ECG) compared to pulse oximetry (PO) in detecting heart rate (HR) during high-risk newborn resuscitation. Methods A prospective observational study was performed with high-risk delivery cases to measure the time required for HR detection. A conventional PO and a standard ECG monitor were used for HR assessment. Results Forty-one infants were analyzed in the study, and 11 needed resuscitation. The study population was divided according to gestational age (GA): 9 were GA <32 weeks, 28 were GA 32–35 weeks, and 4 were GA ≥36 weeks. Time from ECG placement to HR detection (median, 30 seconds; interquartile range [IQR], 20–43.5 seconds) was significantly faster than that from PO placement (median, 125 seconds; IQR, 100–175 seconds; P<0.001). Time from ECG placement to HR detection was shortest in infants with GA <32 weeks at birth (19 seconds [IQR, 11.5–30.0] for GA <32 weeks vs. 34.5 seconds [IQR, 25.0–44.3] for GA 32–35 weeks vs. 39.5 seconds [IQR, 30.0–64.8] for GA ≥36 weeks; P=0.039). Conclusion ECG effectively evaluated HR during neonatal resuscitation compared to PO. Low-GA infants who require resuscitation may benefit from HR evaluation with nearby standard ECG.http://ceemjournal.org/upload/pdf/ceem-24-245.pdfheart ratenewborn infantresuscitationelectrocardiogramoxygen saturation monitor
spellingShingle Kee Hyun Cho
Hyun Su Lee
Eun Sun Kim
Assessing the efficacy of electrocardiogram for heart rate evaluation during newborn resuscitation at birth: a prospective observational study
Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine
heart rate
newborn infant
resuscitation
electrocardiogram
oxygen saturation monitor
title Assessing the efficacy of electrocardiogram for heart rate evaluation during newborn resuscitation at birth: a prospective observational study
title_full Assessing the efficacy of electrocardiogram for heart rate evaluation during newborn resuscitation at birth: a prospective observational study
title_fullStr Assessing the efficacy of electrocardiogram for heart rate evaluation during newborn resuscitation at birth: a prospective observational study
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the efficacy of electrocardiogram for heart rate evaluation during newborn resuscitation at birth: a prospective observational study
title_short Assessing the efficacy of electrocardiogram for heart rate evaluation during newborn resuscitation at birth: a prospective observational study
title_sort assessing the efficacy of electrocardiogram for heart rate evaluation during newborn resuscitation at birth a prospective observational study
topic heart rate
newborn infant
resuscitation
electrocardiogram
oxygen saturation monitor
url http://ceemjournal.org/upload/pdf/ceem-24-245.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT keehyuncho assessingtheefficacyofelectrocardiogramforheartrateevaluationduringnewbornresuscitationatbirthaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT hyunsulee assessingtheefficacyofelectrocardiogramforheartrateevaluationduringnewbornresuscitationatbirthaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT eunsunkim assessingtheefficacyofelectrocardiogramforheartrateevaluationduringnewbornresuscitationatbirthaprospectiveobservationalstudy