Fair Enough? Mini-Public Composition and Outcome Acceptance from the Maxi Public

One hope associated with the spread of deliberative mini-publics in established democracies is that they could increase acceptance of policies because of their inclusive and diverse composition. Yet, participants are not representative of the broader public in all characteristics. They tend to be mo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Davide Vittori, Emilien Paulis, Jean-Benoit Pilet, Sebsastien Rojon
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Westminster Press 2024-08-01
Series:Journal of Deliberative Democracy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://delibdemjournal.org/article/id/1535/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850057907749519360
author Davide Vittori
Emilien Paulis
Jean-Benoit Pilet
Sebsastien Rojon
author_facet Davide Vittori
Emilien Paulis
Jean-Benoit Pilet
Sebsastien Rojon
author_sort Davide Vittori
collection DOAJ
description One hope associated with the spread of deliberative mini-publics in established democracies is that they could increase acceptance of policies because of their inclusive and diverse composition. Yet, participants are not representative of the broader public in all characteristics. They tend to be more engaged with politics or debated policy issues than the average population. Building on a Climate Citizens’ Assembly commissioned by the Luxembourg government in 2022 (Klima Biergerrot-KBR), this study examines how the maxi public reacts when informed about the profile of mini-public participants. Via a survey experiment, we found that descriptive representation and similarity matter to accept the outcomes, but not universally. It depends on respondents’ attitudes about mini-publics prior to the experiment and situations of cognitive dissonance. Indeed, when people initially neutral or opposed to mini-publics (‘participatory skeptics’) learn that the process is fairly representing (their in-) groups, they increase their willingness to accept the outcomes, stressing improvement in the perceived legitimacy. By contrast, the lack of social inclusion and political diversity is an issue to keep the ‘participatory enthusiasts’ on board, stressing that they also pay attention (and perhaps even more) to how and which groups of citizens are represented within a mini-public. Our message is that deliberative mini-publics need to address more thoroughly how they can best meet their normative assumptions of participatory equality and procedural fairness; otherwise, they may not help to foster political legitimacy.
format Article
id doaj-art-d632374400ec467cabde7fec8cb06de6
institution DOAJ
issn 2634-0488
language English
publishDate 2024-08-01
publisher University of Westminster Press
record_format Article
series Journal of Deliberative Democracy
spelling doaj-art-d632374400ec467cabde7fec8cb06de62025-08-20T02:51:18ZengUniversity of Westminster PressJournal of Deliberative Democracy2634-04882024-08-0120110.16997/jdd.1535Fair Enough? Mini-Public Composition and Outcome Acceptance from the Maxi PublicDavide Vittori0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0161-9679Emilien Paulis1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5954-4182Jean-Benoit Pilet2https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5612-0835Sebsastien Rojon3https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3559-4673Université libre de BruxellesDepartment of Humanities, University of LuxembourgUniversité libre de BruxellesUniversité libre de BruxellesOne hope associated with the spread of deliberative mini-publics in established democracies is that they could increase acceptance of policies because of their inclusive and diverse composition. Yet, participants are not representative of the broader public in all characteristics. They tend to be more engaged with politics or debated policy issues than the average population. Building on a Climate Citizens’ Assembly commissioned by the Luxembourg government in 2022 (Klima Biergerrot-KBR), this study examines how the maxi public reacts when informed about the profile of mini-public participants. Via a survey experiment, we found that descriptive representation and similarity matter to accept the outcomes, but not universally. It depends on respondents’ attitudes about mini-publics prior to the experiment and situations of cognitive dissonance. Indeed, when people initially neutral or opposed to mini-publics (‘participatory skeptics’) learn that the process is fairly representing (their in-) groups, they increase their willingness to accept the outcomes, stressing improvement in the perceived legitimacy. By contrast, the lack of social inclusion and political diversity is an issue to keep the ‘participatory enthusiasts’ on board, stressing that they also pay attention (and perhaps even more) to how and which groups of citizens are represented within a mini-public. Our message is that deliberative mini-publics need to address more thoroughly how they can best meet their normative assumptions of participatory equality and procedural fairness; otherwise, they may not help to foster political legitimacy.https://delibdemjournal.org/article/id/1535/deliberative mini-publicsmini-public compositionoutcome acceptancepublic opinion
spellingShingle Davide Vittori
Emilien Paulis
Jean-Benoit Pilet
Sebsastien Rojon
Fair Enough? Mini-Public Composition and Outcome Acceptance from the Maxi Public
Journal of Deliberative Democracy
deliberative mini-publics
mini-public composition
outcome acceptance
public opinion
title Fair Enough? Mini-Public Composition and Outcome Acceptance from the Maxi Public
title_full Fair Enough? Mini-Public Composition and Outcome Acceptance from the Maxi Public
title_fullStr Fair Enough? Mini-Public Composition and Outcome Acceptance from the Maxi Public
title_full_unstemmed Fair Enough? Mini-Public Composition and Outcome Acceptance from the Maxi Public
title_short Fair Enough? Mini-Public Composition and Outcome Acceptance from the Maxi Public
title_sort fair enough mini public composition and outcome acceptance from the maxi public
topic deliberative mini-publics
mini-public composition
outcome acceptance
public opinion
url https://delibdemjournal.org/article/id/1535/
work_keys_str_mv AT davidevittori fairenoughminipubliccompositionandoutcomeacceptancefromthemaxipublic
AT emilienpaulis fairenoughminipubliccompositionandoutcomeacceptancefromthemaxipublic
AT jeanbenoitpilet fairenoughminipubliccompositionandoutcomeacceptancefromthemaxipublic
AT sebsastienrojon fairenoughminipubliccompositionandoutcomeacceptancefromthemaxipublic