Student Teachers’ Didactic Choices and Motives when Designing Digital Competence Education: Pupils’ Age as a Didactic Dimension

This study furthers the understanding of how student teachers make didactic choices when designing digital competence education. It investigates what age groups student teachers choose to include in digital competence education, how they motivate these choices, and how their choices can be underst...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Carolina Martínez
Format: Article
Language:Danish
Published: Malmö University Press 2025-06-01
Series:Educare
Subjects:
Online Access:https://publicera.kb.se/educare/article/view/54827
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849471389956833280
author Carolina Martínez
author_facet Carolina Martínez
author_sort Carolina Martínez
collection DOAJ
description This study furthers the understanding of how student teachers make didactic choices when designing digital competence education. It investigates what age groups student teachers choose to include in digital competence education, how they motivate these choices, and how their choices can be understood within the context of the university course in which they designed this education. The material includes 48 papers written by student teachers within a Swedish university course in which they each designed a project intended to promote digital competence among pupils in school-age educare (children aged 6 to 12 years). These papers were analyzed using a mixed-method approach involving both qualitative and quantitative analysis. The perspectives on age as a didactic dimension developed by Klafki and Comenius and the concept of boundary-work were used as a theoretical framework to analyze student teachers’ didactic choices. The results show that students most commonly choose to include older pupils, namely those in Grade 3 and 4 (9–10-year-olds), while paying less attention to the younger pupils. They motivated their choice of age groups based on arguments related to three key themes: children’s media use, children’s capacities, and their own future needs and circumstances as teachers. One implication of the study is that teacher education courses on digital competence should emphasize age as a didactic dimension and encourage student teachers to critically reflect on their assumptions about children’s age and capabilities.
format Article
id doaj-art-d6276ba5458e41fe822210e91c877efb
institution Kabale University
issn 2004-5190
language Danish
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher Malmö University Press
record_format Article
series Educare
spelling doaj-art-d6276ba5458e41fe822210e91c877efb2025-08-20T03:24:51ZdanMalmö University PressEducare2004-51902025-06-01210.63310/edu.2025.2.54827Student Teachers’ Didactic Choices and Motives when Designing Digital Competence Education: Pupils’ Age as a Didactic DimensionCarolina Martínez0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9119-3666Malmö University This study furthers the understanding of how student teachers make didactic choices when designing digital competence education. It investigates what age groups student teachers choose to include in digital competence education, how they motivate these choices, and how their choices can be understood within the context of the university course in which they designed this education. The material includes 48 papers written by student teachers within a Swedish university course in which they each designed a project intended to promote digital competence among pupils in school-age educare (children aged 6 to 12 years). These papers were analyzed using a mixed-method approach involving both qualitative and quantitative analysis. The perspectives on age as a didactic dimension developed by Klafki and Comenius and the concept of boundary-work were used as a theoretical framework to analyze student teachers’ didactic choices. The results show that students most commonly choose to include older pupils, namely those in Grade 3 and 4 (9–10-year-olds), while paying less attention to the younger pupils. They motivated their choice of age groups based on arguments related to three key themes: children’s media use, children’s capacities, and their own future needs and circumstances as teachers. One implication of the study is that teacher education courses on digital competence should emphasize age as a didactic dimension and encourage student teachers to critically reflect on their assumptions about children’s age and capabilities. https://publicera.kb.se/educare/article/view/54827agedidacticsdigital competenceschool-age educareteacher education
spellingShingle Carolina Martínez
Student Teachers’ Didactic Choices and Motives when Designing Digital Competence Education: Pupils’ Age as a Didactic Dimension
Educare
age
didactics
digital competence
school-age educare
teacher education
title Student Teachers’ Didactic Choices and Motives when Designing Digital Competence Education: Pupils’ Age as a Didactic Dimension
title_full Student Teachers’ Didactic Choices and Motives when Designing Digital Competence Education: Pupils’ Age as a Didactic Dimension
title_fullStr Student Teachers’ Didactic Choices and Motives when Designing Digital Competence Education: Pupils’ Age as a Didactic Dimension
title_full_unstemmed Student Teachers’ Didactic Choices and Motives when Designing Digital Competence Education: Pupils’ Age as a Didactic Dimension
title_short Student Teachers’ Didactic Choices and Motives when Designing Digital Competence Education: Pupils’ Age as a Didactic Dimension
title_sort student teachers didactic choices and motives when designing digital competence education pupils age as a didactic dimension
topic age
didactics
digital competence
school-age educare
teacher education
url https://publicera.kb.se/educare/article/view/54827
work_keys_str_mv AT carolinamartinez studentteachersdidacticchoicesandmotiveswhendesigningdigitalcompetenceeducationpupilsageasadidacticdimension