The diagnosis of DIC: a current overview

The name of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) and its diagnostic criteria remain controversial. DIC is a clinical syndrome caused by a variety of etiologies, which determines its high heterogeneity. It is inappropriate to adopt the same diagnostic criteria. DIC has its common characterist...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hongyu Yang, Xiaochun Ma, Xu Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2025.1502628/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832576371329597440
author Hongyu Yang
Xiaochun Ma
Xu Li
author_facet Hongyu Yang
Xiaochun Ma
Xu Li
author_sort Hongyu Yang
collection DOAJ
description The name of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) and its diagnostic criteria remain controversial. DIC is a clinical syndrome caused by a variety of etiologies, which determines its high heterogeneity. It is inappropriate to adopt the same diagnostic criteria. DIC has its common characteristics. First, in most DIC, thrombosis and bleeding coexist. Second, DIC is a dynamic process. Third, endothelial cell injury and systemic coagulation activation are the core of DIC. Fourth, DIC is an initiating factor of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS). There are still controversies about the diagnostic criteria of DIC. First, it relies on clinical manifestations and laboratory tests, which cannot reflect pathophysiology. Second, the clinical manifestations were not sensitive or specific. Third, there is a lack of sensitive biomarkers. Fourth, the parameters in the current diagnostic criteria cannot fully reflect the actual coagulation function. Fifth, it is obviously inappropriate to use the same scoring system for diagnosis of clinical syndromes with different etiologies and pathophysiology. Therefore, it is urgent to re-establish the diagnostic criteria for DIC. In recent years, the understanding of DIC has been continuously improved, including the in-depth understanding of the pathogenesis, the classification of coagulation phenotypes, and the development of the “two-step” diagnosis of DIC, etc. All of these contribute to the establishment of new diagnostic criteria for DIC. In conclusion, it is necessary to develop personalized diagnostic criteria based on etiology, reflecting pathophysiological mechanisms, establishing clear cut-off values for parameters, being clinical applicable, being globally unified, and most importantly, being able to identify therapeutic targets.
format Article
id doaj-art-d626d07958464380aa5a21d01e368f4a
institution Kabale University
issn 2296-858X
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Medicine
spelling doaj-art-d626d07958464380aa5a21d01e368f4a2025-01-31T06:40:07ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Medicine2296-858X2025-01-011210.3389/fmed.2025.15026281502628The diagnosis of DIC: a current overviewHongyu YangXiaochun MaXu LiThe name of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) and its diagnostic criteria remain controversial. DIC is a clinical syndrome caused by a variety of etiologies, which determines its high heterogeneity. It is inappropriate to adopt the same diagnostic criteria. DIC has its common characteristics. First, in most DIC, thrombosis and bleeding coexist. Second, DIC is a dynamic process. Third, endothelial cell injury and systemic coagulation activation are the core of DIC. Fourth, DIC is an initiating factor of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS). There are still controversies about the diagnostic criteria of DIC. First, it relies on clinical manifestations and laboratory tests, which cannot reflect pathophysiology. Second, the clinical manifestations were not sensitive or specific. Third, there is a lack of sensitive biomarkers. Fourth, the parameters in the current diagnostic criteria cannot fully reflect the actual coagulation function. Fifth, it is obviously inappropriate to use the same scoring system for diagnosis of clinical syndromes with different etiologies and pathophysiology. Therefore, it is urgent to re-establish the diagnostic criteria for DIC. In recent years, the understanding of DIC has been continuously improved, including the in-depth understanding of the pathogenesis, the classification of coagulation phenotypes, and the development of the “two-step” diagnosis of DIC, etc. All of these contribute to the establishment of new diagnostic criteria for DIC. In conclusion, it is necessary to develop personalized diagnostic criteria based on etiology, reflecting pathophysiological mechanisms, establishing clear cut-off values for parameters, being clinical applicable, being globally unified, and most importantly, being able to identify therapeutic targets.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2025.1502628/fulldisseminated intravascular coagulationdiagnostic criteriacoagulationfibrinolysisplatelet
spellingShingle Hongyu Yang
Xiaochun Ma
Xu Li
The diagnosis of DIC: a current overview
Frontiers in Medicine
disseminated intravascular coagulation
diagnostic criteria
coagulation
fibrinolysis
platelet
title The diagnosis of DIC: a current overview
title_full The diagnosis of DIC: a current overview
title_fullStr The diagnosis of DIC: a current overview
title_full_unstemmed The diagnosis of DIC: a current overview
title_short The diagnosis of DIC: a current overview
title_sort diagnosis of dic a current overview
topic disseminated intravascular coagulation
diagnostic criteria
coagulation
fibrinolysis
platelet
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2025.1502628/full
work_keys_str_mv AT hongyuyang thediagnosisofdicacurrentoverview
AT xiaochunma thediagnosisofdicacurrentoverview
AT xuli thediagnosisofdicacurrentoverview
AT hongyuyang diagnosisofdicacurrentoverview
AT xiaochunma diagnosisofdicacurrentoverview
AT xuli diagnosisofdicacurrentoverview