A Critical Review of The Roman Historian Tacitus's Book of Annals
The Roman historian Tacitus’ s Book of Annals is an important historical source on the history of the Parthians and their neighbors. Although Mirsaidi’s, the translator, main focus is on Roman history, this book also has some very important mentions on the role of the Parthians and their subordinat...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | fas |
| Published: |
Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies (IHCS)
2020-08-01
|
| Series: | پژوهشنامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامههای علوم انسانی |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://criticalstudy.ihcs.ac.ir/article_5493_d122238197245148c6acd4c8a481549a.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1841555273867591680 |
|---|---|
| author | Yaser Malekzadeh Sorour Khorashadi |
| author_facet | Yaser Malekzadeh Sorour Khorashadi |
| author_sort | Yaser Malekzadeh |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The Roman historian Tacitus’ s Book of Annals is an important historical source on the history of the Parthians and their neighbors. Although Mirsaidi’s, the translator, main focus is on Roman history, this book also has some very important mentions on the role of the Parthians and their subordinate lands, but they were not translated. In this work, a comparative study was conducted between the original English version of the book and its Persian translation to examine the accuracy of the content of the Persian translation. The authors have tried to review the translation of the book after introducing the main gist of the book and some of its important non-Persian editions and subsequently comparing these translations with its English translation. This reminds the value and/or issues related to the work, along with an emphasis on some neglected points in the Persian translation. The writers of this article have translated some parts of the book, which relates to Parthian history in Iberia and Armenia. Iranian and Parthian houses played an important role in these lands. These parts are not in the Mirsa’idi’s translation, but their history was in association with Parthian history in Persia. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-d61e7505de364fad8f1b745fdb07e4c9 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2383-1650 |
| language | fas |
| publishDate | 2020-08-01 |
| publisher | Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies (IHCS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | پژوهشنامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامههای علوم انسانی |
| spelling | doaj-art-d61e7505de364fad8f1b745fdb07e4c92025-01-08T05:47:28ZfasInstitute for Humanities and Cultural Studies (IHCS)پژوهشنامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامههای علوم انسانی2383-16502020-08-0120630532610.30465/crtls.2020.54935493A Critical Review of The Roman Historian Tacitus's Book of AnnalsYaser Malekzadeh0Sorour Khorashadi1PhD in Ancient History of Iran, Faculty of Literature & Humanities, University of Tehran, Iran,Assistant Professor, Department of Archeology, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, IranThe Roman historian Tacitus’ s Book of Annals is an important historical source on the history of the Parthians and their neighbors. Although Mirsaidi’s, the translator, main focus is on Roman history, this book also has some very important mentions on the role of the Parthians and their subordinate lands, but they were not translated. In this work, a comparative study was conducted between the original English version of the book and its Persian translation to examine the accuracy of the content of the Persian translation. The authors have tried to review the translation of the book after introducing the main gist of the book and some of its important non-Persian editions and subsequently comparing these translations with its English translation. This reminds the value and/or issues related to the work, along with an emphasis on some neglected points in the Persian translation. The writers of this article have translated some parts of the book, which relates to Parthian history in Iberia and Armenia. Iranian and Parthian houses played an important role in these lands. These parts are not in the Mirsa’idi’s translation, but their history was in association with Parthian history in Persia.https://criticalstudy.ihcs.ac.ir/article_5493_d122238197245148c6acd4c8a481549a.pdfannalstacitusromarsacidsmirsa’idi |
| spellingShingle | Yaser Malekzadeh Sorour Khorashadi A Critical Review of The Roman Historian Tacitus's Book of Annals پژوهشنامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامههای علوم انسانی annals tacitus rom arsacids mirsa’idi |
| title | A Critical Review of
The Roman Historian Tacitus's Book of Annals |
| title_full | A Critical Review of
The Roman Historian Tacitus's Book of Annals |
| title_fullStr | A Critical Review of
The Roman Historian Tacitus's Book of Annals |
| title_full_unstemmed | A Critical Review of
The Roman Historian Tacitus's Book of Annals |
| title_short | A Critical Review of
The Roman Historian Tacitus's Book of Annals |
| title_sort | critical review of the roman historian tacitus s book of annals |
| topic | annals tacitus rom arsacids mirsa’idi |
| url | https://criticalstudy.ihcs.ac.ir/article_5493_d122238197245148c6acd4c8a481549a.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT yasermalekzadeh acriticalreviewoftheromanhistoriantacitussbookofannals AT sorourkhorashadi acriticalreviewoftheromanhistoriantacitussbookofannals AT yasermalekzadeh criticalreviewoftheromanhistoriantacitussbookofannals AT sorourkhorashadi criticalreviewoftheromanhistoriantacitussbookofannals |