The contrasted impacts of grasshoppers on soil microbial activities in function of primary production and herbivore diet
Herbivory can have contrasted impacts on soil microbes and nutrient cycling, which has stimulated the development of conceptual frameworks exploring the links between below- and aboveground processes. The “productivity model” predicts that herbivores stimulate microbial activities and accelerate nut...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Peer Community In
2023-01-01
|
| Series: | Peer Community Journal |
| Online Access: | https://peercommunityjournal.org/articles/10.24072/pcjournal.229/ |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1825206439557201920 |
|---|---|
| author | Ibanez, Sébastien Foulquier, Arnaud Brun, Charles Colace, Marie-Pascale Piton, Gabin Bernard, Lionel Gallet, Christiane Clément, Jean-Christophe |
| author_facet | Ibanez, Sébastien Foulquier, Arnaud Brun, Charles Colace, Marie-Pascale Piton, Gabin Bernard, Lionel Gallet, Christiane Clément, Jean-Christophe |
| author_sort | Ibanez, Sébastien |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Herbivory can have contrasted impacts on soil microbes and nutrient cycling, which has stimulated the development of conceptual frameworks exploring the links between below- and aboveground processes. The “productivity model” predicts that herbivores stimulate microbial activities and accelerate nutrient mineralization in productive ecosystems, while they have an opposite effect in less productive ecosystems. In parallel, the “diet model” predicts that herbivores feeding on conservative plants accelerate nutrient cycling while those feeding on exploitative plants decelerate nutrient cycling, due to changes in litter inputs. Since these two frameworks can lead to conflicting predictions in some cases, experimental evidence combining herbivore diet and plant productivity is required. During two consecutive years, we conducted an experiment controlling the presence of three grasshopper species consuming either grasses, forbs or both in twelve natural and managed alpine grasslands with contrasted productivities. In order to assess the effects of herbivory on soil microbes, we measured their extracellular enzymatic activities, biomass and potential nitrogen mineralization (PNM). Soil and vegetation were also characterized to test how much they modulated the effects of herbivory on microbes. Contrary to the predictions of the diet model, the effects of herbivory on microbial characteristics did not depend on the herbivores diet, but were influenced by primary production, though in a way that differed from the productivity model. The most productive sites were constituted by exploitative plant species which depleted N resources in the soil, and by microbes producing relatively few extracellular enzymes, leading to a lower PNM. Herbivory increased microbial biomass and decreased the production of extracellular enzymes in those sites, possibly through the stimulation of root exudates produced by exploitative species. The least productive sites were characterized by conservative plants, high soil C content, and by microbes having a resource acquisition strategy (more extracellular enzymes, higher PNM). Herbivory decreased microbial biomass and increased the production of extracellular enzymes in those sites. This pattern can be explained by the loss of carbon associated with insect respiration, which increases the resource requirements of microbes and by a lower production of root exudates by conservative species. Therefore, the effects of two years of herbivory on soil microbes were at odds with the productivity model, which focuses instead on longer term effects corresponding to herbivory-induced changes in plant species composition. This highlights the multidimensional feature of the impacts of herbivory on ecosystem functioning, both in space and time.
|
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-d61e696c11724cf3bdaa374bced15150 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2804-3871 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2023-01-01 |
| publisher | Peer Community In |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Peer Community Journal |
| spelling | doaj-art-d61e696c11724cf3bdaa374bced151502025-02-07T10:16:49ZengPeer Community InPeer Community Journal2804-38712023-01-01310.24072/pcjournal.22910.24072/pcjournal.229The contrasted impacts of grasshoppers on soil microbial activities in function of primary production and herbivore dietIbanez, Sébastien0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7551-4968Foulquier, Arnaud1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8308-5841Brun, Charles2Colace, Marie-Pascale3Piton, Gabin4https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6036-5787Bernard, Lionel5https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6262-9248Gallet, Christiane6Clément, Jean-Christophe7https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0841-7199Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS UMR 5553, LECA, Chambéry, FranceUniv. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS UMR 5553, LECA, Chambéry, FranceUniv. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS UMR 5553, LECA, Chambéry, France; University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland – Land, Nature, Environment Institute, Hepia Geneva, Route de Presinge 150, CH-1254, Jussy, SwitzerlandUniv. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS UMR 5553, LECA, Chambéry, FranceUniv. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS UMR 5553, LECA, Chambéry, FranceUniv. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS UMR 5553, LECA, Chambéry, FranceUniv. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS UMR 5553, LECA, Chambéry, FranceUniv. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS UMR 5553, LECA, Chambéry, France; Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, INRAE, CARRTEL, Thonon-Les-Bains, FranceHerbivory can have contrasted impacts on soil microbes and nutrient cycling, which has stimulated the development of conceptual frameworks exploring the links between below- and aboveground processes. The “productivity model” predicts that herbivores stimulate microbial activities and accelerate nutrient mineralization in productive ecosystems, while they have an opposite effect in less productive ecosystems. In parallel, the “diet model” predicts that herbivores feeding on conservative plants accelerate nutrient cycling while those feeding on exploitative plants decelerate nutrient cycling, due to changes in litter inputs. Since these two frameworks can lead to conflicting predictions in some cases, experimental evidence combining herbivore diet and plant productivity is required. During two consecutive years, we conducted an experiment controlling the presence of three grasshopper species consuming either grasses, forbs or both in twelve natural and managed alpine grasslands with contrasted productivities. In order to assess the effects of herbivory on soil microbes, we measured their extracellular enzymatic activities, biomass and potential nitrogen mineralization (PNM). Soil and vegetation were also characterized to test how much they modulated the effects of herbivory on microbes. Contrary to the predictions of the diet model, the effects of herbivory on microbial characteristics did not depend on the herbivores diet, but were influenced by primary production, though in a way that differed from the productivity model. The most productive sites were constituted by exploitative plant species which depleted N resources in the soil, and by microbes producing relatively few extracellular enzymes, leading to a lower PNM. Herbivory increased microbial biomass and decreased the production of extracellular enzymes in those sites, possibly through the stimulation of root exudates produced by exploitative species. The least productive sites were characterized by conservative plants, high soil C content, and by microbes having a resource acquisition strategy (more extracellular enzymes, higher PNM). Herbivory decreased microbial biomass and increased the production of extracellular enzymes in those sites. This pattern can be explained by the loss of carbon associated with insect respiration, which increases the resource requirements of microbes and by a lower production of root exudates by conservative species. Therefore, the effects of two years of herbivory on soil microbes were at odds with the productivity model, which focuses instead on longer term effects corresponding to herbivory-induced changes in plant species composition. This highlights the multidimensional feature of the impacts of herbivory on ecosystem functioning, both in space and time. https://peercommunityjournal.org/articles/10.24072/pcjournal.229/ |
| spellingShingle | Ibanez, Sébastien Foulquier, Arnaud Brun, Charles Colace, Marie-Pascale Piton, Gabin Bernard, Lionel Gallet, Christiane Clément, Jean-Christophe The contrasted impacts of grasshoppers on soil microbial activities in function of primary production and herbivore diet Peer Community Journal |
| title | The contrasted impacts of grasshoppers on soil microbial activities in function of primary production and herbivore diet |
| title_full | The contrasted impacts of grasshoppers on soil microbial activities in function of primary production and herbivore diet |
| title_fullStr | The contrasted impacts of grasshoppers on soil microbial activities in function of primary production and herbivore diet |
| title_full_unstemmed | The contrasted impacts of grasshoppers on soil microbial activities in function of primary production and herbivore diet |
| title_short | The contrasted impacts of grasshoppers on soil microbial activities in function of primary production and herbivore diet |
| title_sort | contrasted impacts of grasshoppers on soil microbial activities in function of primary production and herbivore diet |
| url | https://peercommunityjournal.org/articles/10.24072/pcjournal.229/ |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ibanezsebastien thecontrastedimpactsofgrasshoppersonsoilmicrobialactivitiesinfunctionofprimaryproductionandherbivorediet AT foulquierarnaud thecontrastedimpactsofgrasshoppersonsoilmicrobialactivitiesinfunctionofprimaryproductionandherbivorediet AT bruncharles thecontrastedimpactsofgrasshoppersonsoilmicrobialactivitiesinfunctionofprimaryproductionandherbivorediet AT colacemariepascale thecontrastedimpactsofgrasshoppersonsoilmicrobialactivitiesinfunctionofprimaryproductionandherbivorediet AT pitongabin thecontrastedimpactsofgrasshoppersonsoilmicrobialactivitiesinfunctionofprimaryproductionandherbivorediet AT bernardlionel thecontrastedimpactsofgrasshoppersonsoilmicrobialactivitiesinfunctionofprimaryproductionandherbivorediet AT galletchristiane thecontrastedimpactsofgrasshoppersonsoilmicrobialactivitiesinfunctionofprimaryproductionandherbivorediet AT clementjeanchristophe thecontrastedimpactsofgrasshoppersonsoilmicrobialactivitiesinfunctionofprimaryproductionandherbivorediet AT ibanezsebastien contrastedimpactsofgrasshoppersonsoilmicrobialactivitiesinfunctionofprimaryproductionandherbivorediet AT foulquierarnaud contrastedimpactsofgrasshoppersonsoilmicrobialactivitiesinfunctionofprimaryproductionandherbivorediet AT bruncharles contrastedimpactsofgrasshoppersonsoilmicrobialactivitiesinfunctionofprimaryproductionandherbivorediet AT colacemariepascale contrastedimpactsofgrasshoppersonsoilmicrobialactivitiesinfunctionofprimaryproductionandherbivorediet AT pitongabin contrastedimpactsofgrasshoppersonsoilmicrobialactivitiesinfunctionofprimaryproductionandherbivorediet AT bernardlionel contrastedimpactsofgrasshoppersonsoilmicrobialactivitiesinfunctionofprimaryproductionandherbivorediet AT galletchristiane contrastedimpactsofgrasshoppersonsoilmicrobialactivitiesinfunctionofprimaryproductionandherbivorediet AT clementjeanchristophe contrastedimpactsofgrasshoppersonsoilmicrobialactivitiesinfunctionofprimaryproductionandherbivorediet |