Microbiological Analysis of Wild Lowbush Blueberries Harvested in Nova Scotia, Canada for the Fresh Produce Market

Canada is a leading producer of wild lowbush blueberries, most of which are mechanically harvested, washed, individually quick frozen (IQF), and bulk packaged. Still, some berries are harvested by more gentle methods and sold as fresh-packed products. These berries do not undergo a wash step, nor ar...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Timothy Ells, Nancy Tregunno, Lihua Fan, Michele Elliot, Craig Doucette, Hugh Lyu, Alexa Jollimore
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-11-01
Series:Microorganisms
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/12/11/2251
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850068572940795904
author Timothy Ells
Nancy Tregunno
Lihua Fan
Michele Elliot
Craig Doucette
Hugh Lyu
Alexa Jollimore
author_facet Timothy Ells
Nancy Tregunno
Lihua Fan
Michele Elliot
Craig Doucette
Hugh Lyu
Alexa Jollimore
author_sort Timothy Ells
collection DOAJ
description Canada is a leading producer of wild lowbush blueberries, most of which are mechanically harvested, washed, individually quick frozen (IQF), and bulk packaged. Still, some berries are harvested by more gentle methods and sold as fresh-packed products. These berries do not undergo a wash step, nor are subjected to antimicrobial treatments. The purpose of this study was to conduct a microbiological survey of berries harvested in the province of Nova Scotia to assess their potential for harborage of bacterial foodborne pathogens. A combination of standardized plate count methods and 3M-Petrifilm protocols were used to enumerate total aerobic mesophilic bacteria (APC), yeasts and molds (YMC), coliforms, and generic <i>E. coli</i>, the latter being an indicator of fecal contamination. Overall, APC and YMC levels were 1.2 and 0.5 log greater, respectively, for berries collected early in the harvest season versus those acquired late season and varied significantly (<i>p</i> < 0.05) between farm (location) and harvest practices used. Berries harvested by our team using sanitized hand rakes (SH) had consistently lower APC and YMC levels than those harvested by farm crews. Yet, when gentle harvesting (GH) methods (hand-raking, walk-behind or modified mechanical harvesters) were employed on farms, lower numbers were generally observed compared to berries harvested by traditional tractor-mounted mechanized harvesters (MH). The presence of coliforms (and their levels) was also impacted by the harvest method, with detection rates of ~29%, 73%, and 92% in SH, GH, and MH samples, respectively. Mean counts were < 2.5 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g for both SH and GH berries, but significantly higher (<i>p</i> < 0.05) on MH berries (3.6 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g). Although ~56% of all berry samples collected (n = 350) contained coliforms, only 12 were positive for <i>E. coli</i>, 9 of which were MH samples. Only the latter had numbers > 2 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g, but none tested positive for Shiga toxin-producing serotype O157 (STEC O157) or <i>Salmonella</i> spp. when using internationally recognized selective enrichment and plating methods. ATP luminescence was used to assess the general hygiene of processing lines, whereby “hot spots” for microbial activity were identified, even after cleaning., Standard selective enrichment and plating methods were used for the detection of <i>Listeria monocytogenes</i> on 61 swab samples taken from berry totes or conveyor belts at different times during processing; 4 swabs tested positive for <i>L. monocytogenes</i>. However, the pathogen could not be detected by direct plating on selective agar without prior enrichment; this indicated its numbers were low. The results from this work demonstrated that alternative gentle harvest methods can reduce microbial numbers on wild blueberries. Although the frequency of fecal contamination in berry samples appeared to be low and targeted human pathogens were not detected; this represents a single study conducted over one harvest season. Therefore, it would be prudent for processors to seek effective antimicrobial technologies prior to packaging, while consumers should use caution and thoroughly wash produce before consumption. Where sporadic detection of <i>L. monocytogenes</i> was observed on environmental samples from the processing line, processors must ensure that effective sanitation programs are implemented to avoid potential food safety risks.
format Article
id doaj-art-d5d649bbe264428693ddb3bf3095089b
institution DOAJ
issn 2076-2607
language English
publishDate 2024-11-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Microorganisms
spelling doaj-art-d5d649bbe264428693ddb3bf3095089b2025-08-20T02:48:01ZengMDPI AGMicroorganisms2076-26072024-11-011211225110.3390/microorganisms12112251Microbiological Analysis of Wild Lowbush Blueberries Harvested in Nova Scotia, Canada for the Fresh Produce MarketTimothy Ells0Nancy Tregunno1Lihua Fan2Michele Elliot3Craig Doucette4Hugh Lyu5Alexa Jollimore6Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Kentville Research and Development Centre, Kentville, NS B4N 1J5, CanadaPerennia Food and Agriculture Inc., Bible Hill, NS B6L 2H5, CanadaAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada Kentville Research and Development Centre, Kentville, NS B4N 1J5, CanadaAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada Kentville Research and Development Centre, Kentville, NS B4N 1J5, CanadaAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada Kentville Research and Development Centre, Kentville, NS B4N 1J5, CanadaPerennia Food and Agriculture Inc., Bible Hill, NS B6L 2H5, CanadaPerennia Food and Agriculture Inc., Bible Hill, NS B6L 2H5, CanadaCanada is a leading producer of wild lowbush blueberries, most of which are mechanically harvested, washed, individually quick frozen (IQF), and bulk packaged. Still, some berries are harvested by more gentle methods and sold as fresh-packed products. These berries do not undergo a wash step, nor are subjected to antimicrobial treatments. The purpose of this study was to conduct a microbiological survey of berries harvested in the province of Nova Scotia to assess their potential for harborage of bacterial foodborne pathogens. A combination of standardized plate count methods and 3M-Petrifilm protocols were used to enumerate total aerobic mesophilic bacteria (APC), yeasts and molds (YMC), coliforms, and generic <i>E. coli</i>, the latter being an indicator of fecal contamination. Overall, APC and YMC levels were 1.2 and 0.5 log greater, respectively, for berries collected early in the harvest season versus those acquired late season and varied significantly (<i>p</i> < 0.05) between farm (location) and harvest practices used. Berries harvested by our team using sanitized hand rakes (SH) had consistently lower APC and YMC levels than those harvested by farm crews. Yet, when gentle harvesting (GH) methods (hand-raking, walk-behind or modified mechanical harvesters) were employed on farms, lower numbers were generally observed compared to berries harvested by traditional tractor-mounted mechanized harvesters (MH). The presence of coliforms (and their levels) was also impacted by the harvest method, with detection rates of ~29%, 73%, and 92% in SH, GH, and MH samples, respectively. Mean counts were < 2.5 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g for both SH and GH berries, but significantly higher (<i>p</i> < 0.05) on MH berries (3.6 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g). Although ~56% of all berry samples collected (n = 350) contained coliforms, only 12 were positive for <i>E. coli</i>, 9 of which were MH samples. Only the latter had numbers > 2 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g, but none tested positive for Shiga toxin-producing serotype O157 (STEC O157) or <i>Salmonella</i> spp. when using internationally recognized selective enrichment and plating methods. ATP luminescence was used to assess the general hygiene of processing lines, whereby “hot spots” for microbial activity were identified, even after cleaning., Standard selective enrichment and plating methods were used for the detection of <i>Listeria monocytogenes</i> on 61 swab samples taken from berry totes or conveyor belts at different times during processing; 4 swabs tested positive for <i>L. monocytogenes</i>. However, the pathogen could not be detected by direct plating on selective agar without prior enrichment; this indicated its numbers were low. The results from this work demonstrated that alternative gentle harvest methods can reduce microbial numbers on wild blueberries. Although the frequency of fecal contamination in berry samples appeared to be low and targeted human pathogens were not detected; this represents a single study conducted over one harvest season. Therefore, it would be prudent for processors to seek effective antimicrobial technologies prior to packaging, while consumers should use caution and thoroughly wash produce before consumption. Where sporadic detection of <i>L. monocytogenes</i> was observed on environmental samples from the processing line, processors must ensure that effective sanitation programs are implemented to avoid potential food safety risks.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/12/11/2251wild lowbush blueberriesfresh-packed produceminimal processingfecal indicators<i>Listeria monocytogenes</i>
spellingShingle Timothy Ells
Nancy Tregunno
Lihua Fan
Michele Elliot
Craig Doucette
Hugh Lyu
Alexa Jollimore
Microbiological Analysis of Wild Lowbush Blueberries Harvested in Nova Scotia, Canada for the Fresh Produce Market
Microorganisms
wild lowbush blueberries
fresh-packed produce
minimal processing
fecal indicators
<i>Listeria monocytogenes</i>
title Microbiological Analysis of Wild Lowbush Blueberries Harvested in Nova Scotia, Canada for the Fresh Produce Market
title_full Microbiological Analysis of Wild Lowbush Blueberries Harvested in Nova Scotia, Canada for the Fresh Produce Market
title_fullStr Microbiological Analysis of Wild Lowbush Blueberries Harvested in Nova Scotia, Canada for the Fresh Produce Market
title_full_unstemmed Microbiological Analysis of Wild Lowbush Blueberries Harvested in Nova Scotia, Canada for the Fresh Produce Market
title_short Microbiological Analysis of Wild Lowbush Blueberries Harvested in Nova Scotia, Canada for the Fresh Produce Market
title_sort microbiological analysis of wild lowbush blueberries harvested in nova scotia canada for the fresh produce market
topic wild lowbush blueberries
fresh-packed produce
minimal processing
fecal indicators
<i>Listeria monocytogenes</i>
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/12/11/2251
work_keys_str_mv AT timothyells microbiologicalanalysisofwildlowbushblueberriesharvestedinnovascotiacanadaforthefreshproducemarket
AT nancytregunno microbiologicalanalysisofwildlowbushblueberriesharvestedinnovascotiacanadaforthefreshproducemarket
AT lihuafan microbiologicalanalysisofwildlowbushblueberriesharvestedinnovascotiacanadaforthefreshproducemarket
AT micheleelliot microbiologicalanalysisofwildlowbushblueberriesharvestedinnovascotiacanadaforthefreshproducemarket
AT craigdoucette microbiologicalanalysisofwildlowbushblueberriesharvestedinnovascotiacanadaforthefreshproducemarket
AT hughlyu microbiologicalanalysisofwildlowbushblueberriesharvestedinnovascotiacanadaforthefreshproducemarket
AT alexajollimore microbiologicalanalysisofwildlowbushblueberriesharvestedinnovascotiacanadaforthefreshproducemarket