Biocompatibility of different resin composites after polymerization with two light curing units: an immunohistochemical study

Purpose: The aim of this study is to compare the biocompatibility of two different resin composites after polymerization under two different light sources in three different time periods. Materials and Methods: 72 polyethylene tubes polymerized with 2 different resin composites and 2 different light...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: İrem İpek, Murat Ünal, Tülay Koç
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Istanbul University 2024-01-01
Series:European Oral Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/9DBC63F079CF44FEBEFBB043ABB31097
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850281657732431872
author İrem İpek
Murat Ünal
Tülay Koç
author_facet İrem İpek
Murat Ünal
Tülay Koç
author_sort İrem İpek
collection DOAJ
description Purpose: The aim of this study is to compare the biocompatibility of two different resin composites after polymerization under two different light sources in three different time periods. Materials and Methods: 72 polyethylene tubes polymerized with 2 different resin composites and 2 different light sources (Elipar S10 and Valo ) [Group 1: Kalore Elipar S10 (KE), Group 2: Kalore Valo (KV), Group 3: Essentia Elipar S10 (EE), Group 4: Essentia Valo (EV)] were implanted in the dorsal connective tissue of 18 rats. 24 empty polyethylene tubes [Group 5: (Control group)] were implanted in the dorsal connective tissue of 6 rats. Then, the rats were sacrificed after 7th, 15th and 30th days in each time intervals (n=8). Biopsy samples were stained with H&E and examined for inflammation, necrosis, macrophage infiltrate, giant cell and fibrous capsule criteria. Immunohistochemical staining was performed to evaluate proinflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6 and IL-8).Results: When the composite groups and the control groups were compared; there was difference statistically significant for the criteria of inflammation at 7th and 15th days, there was no statistical difference between the time points in terms of fibrous capsule and necrosis. When the composite groups and control groups were evaluated in terms of proinflammatory cytokines; statistically significant differences were found at 7th, 15th and 30th days.Conclusion: All CRs used in this study showed acceptable biocompatibility in the subcutaneous tissues of rats after polymerization with different light sources.
format Article
id doaj-art-d5c3de08e50c4f7e830480abec8ac69d
institution OA Journals
issn 2651-2823
language English
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Istanbul University
record_format Article
series European Oral Research
spelling doaj-art-d5c3de08e50c4f7e830480abec8ac69d2025-08-20T01:48:12ZengIstanbul UniversityEuropean Oral Research2651-28232024-01-01581222910.26650/eor.20231260787123456Biocompatibility of different resin composites after polymerization with two light curing units: an immunohistochemical studyİrem İpek0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3542-7122Murat Ünal1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5909-0202Tülay Koç2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7132-1325Fırat Üniversitesi, Elazig, TurkiyeSivas Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi, Sivas, TurkiyeSivas Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi, Sivas, TurkiyePurpose: The aim of this study is to compare the biocompatibility of two different resin composites after polymerization under two different light sources in three different time periods. Materials and Methods: 72 polyethylene tubes polymerized with 2 different resin composites and 2 different light sources (Elipar S10 and Valo ) [Group 1: Kalore Elipar S10 (KE), Group 2: Kalore Valo (KV), Group 3: Essentia Elipar S10 (EE), Group 4: Essentia Valo (EV)] were implanted in the dorsal connective tissue of 18 rats. 24 empty polyethylene tubes [Group 5: (Control group)] were implanted in the dorsal connective tissue of 6 rats. Then, the rats were sacrificed after 7th, 15th and 30th days in each time intervals (n=8). Biopsy samples were stained with H&E and examined for inflammation, necrosis, macrophage infiltrate, giant cell and fibrous capsule criteria. Immunohistochemical staining was performed to evaluate proinflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6 and IL-8).Results: When the composite groups and the control groups were compared; there was difference statistically significant for the criteria of inflammation at 7th and 15th days, there was no statistical difference between the time points in terms of fibrous capsule and necrosis. When the composite groups and control groups were evaluated in terms of proinflammatory cytokines; statistically significant differences were found at 7th, 15th and 30th days.Conclusion: All CRs used in this study showed acceptable biocompatibility in the subcutaneous tissues of rats after polymerization with different light sources.https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/9DBC63F079CF44FEBEFBB043ABB31097composite resinslight sourcesbiocompatibilityratimmunohistochemistry
spellingShingle İrem İpek
Murat Ünal
Tülay Koç
Biocompatibility of different resin composites after polymerization with two light curing units: an immunohistochemical study
European Oral Research
composite resins
light sources
biocompatibility
rat
immunohistochemistry
title Biocompatibility of different resin composites after polymerization with two light curing units: an immunohistochemical study
title_full Biocompatibility of different resin composites after polymerization with two light curing units: an immunohistochemical study
title_fullStr Biocompatibility of different resin composites after polymerization with two light curing units: an immunohistochemical study
title_full_unstemmed Biocompatibility of different resin composites after polymerization with two light curing units: an immunohistochemical study
title_short Biocompatibility of different resin composites after polymerization with two light curing units: an immunohistochemical study
title_sort biocompatibility of different resin composites after polymerization with two light curing units an immunohistochemical study
topic composite resins
light sources
biocompatibility
rat
immunohistochemistry
url https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/9DBC63F079CF44FEBEFBB043ABB31097
work_keys_str_mv AT iremipek biocompatibilityofdifferentresincompositesafterpolymerizationwithtwolightcuringunitsanimmunohistochemicalstudy
AT muratunal biocompatibilityofdifferentresincompositesafterpolymerizationwithtwolightcuringunitsanimmunohistochemicalstudy
AT tulaykoc biocompatibilityofdifferentresincompositesafterpolymerizationwithtwolightcuringunitsanimmunohistochemicalstudy