The Elements to Enhance the Successful Start and Completion of Program and Policy Evaluations: The Injury & Violence Prevention (IVP) Program & Policy Evaluation Institute

Background: Public health practitioners, including injury and violence prevention (IVP) professionals, are responsible for implementing evaluations, but often lack formal evaluation training. Impacts of many practitioner-focused evaluation trainings—particularly their ability to help participants s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jamila M. Porter, Laura K. Brennan, Mighty Fine, Ina I. Robinson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Evaluation Center at Western Michigan University 2020-12-01
Series:Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.sfu.ca/jmde/index.php/jmde_1/article/view/659
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850216827959902208
author Jamila M. Porter
Laura K. Brennan
Mighty Fine
Ina I. Robinson
author_facet Jamila M. Porter
Laura K. Brennan
Mighty Fine
Ina I. Robinson
author_sort Jamila M. Porter
collection DOAJ
description Background: Public health practitioners, including injury and violence prevention (IVP) professionals, are responsible for implementing evaluations, but often lack formal evaluation training. Impacts of many practitioner-focused evaluation trainings—particularly their ability to help participants successfully start and complete evaluations—are unknown. Objectives: We assessed the impact of the Injury and Violence Prevention (IVP) Program & Policy Evaluation Institute (“Evaluation Institute”), a team-based, multidisciplinary, and practitioner-focused evaluation training designed to teach state IVP practitioners and their cross-sector partners how to evaluate program and policy interventions. Design: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with members of 13 evaluation teams across eight states at least one year after training participation (24 participants in total). Document reviews were conducted to triangulate, supplement, and contextualize reported improvements to policies, programs, and practices. Intervention: Teams of practitioners applied for and participated in the Evaluation Institute, a five-month evaluation training initiative that included a set of online training modules, an in-person workshop, and technical support from evaluation consultants. Main Outcome Measure(s): The successful start and/or completion of a program or policy evaluation focused on an IVP intervention. Results: Of the 13 teams studied, a total of 12 teams (92%) reported starting or completing an evaluation. Four teams (31%) reported fully completing their evaluations; eight teams (61%) reported partially completing their evaluations. Teams identified common facilitators and barriers that impacted their ability to start and complete their evaluations. Nearly half of the 13 teams (46%) – whether or not they completed their evaluation – reported at least one common improvement made to a program or policy as a result of engaging in an evaluative process. Conclusion: Practitioner-focused evaluation trainings are essential to build critical evaluation skills among public health professionals and their multidisciplinary partners. The process of evaluating an intervention—even if the evaluation is not completed—has substantial value and can drive improvements to public health interventions. The Evaluation Institute can serve as a model for training public health practitioners and their partners to successfully plan, start, complete, and utilize evaluations to improve programs and policies.
format Article
id doaj-art-d580480a73c94dc0aa33e0763afee5b8
institution OA Journals
issn 1556-8180
language English
publishDate 2020-12-01
publisher The Evaluation Center at Western Michigan University
record_format Article
series Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation
spelling doaj-art-d580480a73c94dc0aa33e0763afee5b82025-08-20T02:08:12ZengThe Evaluation Center at Western Michigan UniversityJournal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation1556-81802020-12-01163710.56645/jmde.v16i37.659The Elements to Enhance the Successful Start and Completion of Program and Policy Evaluations: The Injury & Violence Prevention (IVP) Program & Policy Evaluation InstituteJamila M. Porter0Laura K. Brennan1Mighty Fine2Ina I. Robinson3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7388-5773Safe States Alliance Transtria LLCAmerican Public Health Association Safe States Alliance Background: Public health practitioners, including injury and violence prevention (IVP) professionals, are responsible for implementing evaluations, but often lack formal evaluation training. Impacts of many practitioner-focused evaluation trainings—particularly their ability to help participants successfully start and complete evaluations—are unknown. Objectives: We assessed the impact of the Injury and Violence Prevention (IVP) Program & Policy Evaluation Institute (“Evaluation Institute”), a team-based, multidisciplinary, and practitioner-focused evaluation training designed to teach state IVP practitioners and their cross-sector partners how to evaluate program and policy interventions. Design: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with members of 13 evaluation teams across eight states at least one year after training participation (24 participants in total). Document reviews were conducted to triangulate, supplement, and contextualize reported improvements to policies, programs, and practices. Intervention: Teams of practitioners applied for and participated in the Evaluation Institute, a five-month evaluation training initiative that included a set of online training modules, an in-person workshop, and technical support from evaluation consultants. Main Outcome Measure(s): The successful start and/or completion of a program or policy evaluation focused on an IVP intervention. Results: Of the 13 teams studied, a total of 12 teams (92%) reported starting or completing an evaluation. Four teams (31%) reported fully completing their evaluations; eight teams (61%) reported partially completing their evaluations. Teams identified common facilitators and barriers that impacted their ability to start and complete their evaluations. Nearly half of the 13 teams (46%) – whether or not they completed their evaluation – reported at least one common improvement made to a program or policy as a result of engaging in an evaluative process. Conclusion: Practitioner-focused evaluation trainings are essential to build critical evaluation skills among public health professionals and their multidisciplinary partners. The process of evaluating an intervention—even if the evaluation is not completed—has substantial value and can drive improvements to public health interventions. The Evaluation Institute can serve as a model for training public health practitioners and their partners to successfully plan, start, complete, and utilize evaluations to improve programs and policies. https://journals.sfu.ca/jmde/index.php/jmde_1/article/view/659evaluationinjurymultidisciplinary partnershipspractitioner-focused evaluation trainingprofessional developmentprogram and policy evaluation
spellingShingle Jamila M. Porter
Laura K. Brennan
Mighty Fine
Ina I. Robinson
The Elements to Enhance the Successful Start and Completion of Program and Policy Evaluations: The Injury & Violence Prevention (IVP) Program & Policy Evaluation Institute
Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation
evaluation
injury
multidisciplinary partnerships
practitioner-focused evaluation training
professional development
program and policy evaluation
title The Elements to Enhance the Successful Start and Completion of Program and Policy Evaluations: The Injury & Violence Prevention (IVP) Program & Policy Evaluation Institute
title_full The Elements to Enhance the Successful Start and Completion of Program and Policy Evaluations: The Injury & Violence Prevention (IVP) Program & Policy Evaluation Institute
title_fullStr The Elements to Enhance the Successful Start and Completion of Program and Policy Evaluations: The Injury & Violence Prevention (IVP) Program & Policy Evaluation Institute
title_full_unstemmed The Elements to Enhance the Successful Start and Completion of Program and Policy Evaluations: The Injury & Violence Prevention (IVP) Program & Policy Evaluation Institute
title_short The Elements to Enhance the Successful Start and Completion of Program and Policy Evaluations: The Injury & Violence Prevention (IVP) Program & Policy Evaluation Institute
title_sort elements to enhance the successful start and completion of program and policy evaluations the injury violence prevention ivp program policy evaluation institute
topic evaluation
injury
multidisciplinary partnerships
practitioner-focused evaluation training
professional development
program and policy evaluation
url https://journals.sfu.ca/jmde/index.php/jmde_1/article/view/659
work_keys_str_mv AT jamilamporter theelementstoenhancethesuccessfulstartandcompletionofprogramandpolicyevaluationstheinjuryviolencepreventionivpprogrampolicyevaluationinstitute
AT laurakbrennan theelementstoenhancethesuccessfulstartandcompletionofprogramandpolicyevaluationstheinjuryviolencepreventionivpprogrampolicyevaluationinstitute
AT mightyfine theelementstoenhancethesuccessfulstartandcompletionofprogramandpolicyevaluationstheinjuryviolencepreventionivpprogrampolicyevaluationinstitute
AT inairobinson theelementstoenhancethesuccessfulstartandcompletionofprogramandpolicyevaluationstheinjuryviolencepreventionivpprogrampolicyevaluationinstitute
AT jamilamporter elementstoenhancethesuccessfulstartandcompletionofprogramandpolicyevaluationstheinjuryviolencepreventionivpprogrampolicyevaluationinstitute
AT laurakbrennan elementstoenhancethesuccessfulstartandcompletionofprogramandpolicyevaluationstheinjuryviolencepreventionivpprogrampolicyevaluationinstitute
AT mightyfine elementstoenhancethesuccessfulstartandcompletionofprogramandpolicyevaluationstheinjuryviolencepreventionivpprogrampolicyevaluationinstitute
AT inairobinson elementstoenhancethesuccessfulstartandcompletionofprogramandpolicyevaluationstheinjuryviolencepreventionivpprogrampolicyevaluationinstitute