Sepsis Presentation, Interventions, and Outcome Differences Among Men and Women in the Emergency Department

Objectives: Sepsis is a common presentation to the emergency department (ED) and represents a life-threatening syndrome with high mortality rates. The existing literature has conflicting findings regarding outcomes between sexes. Our goal in this study was to investigate the clinical presentation, i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Joseph O’Brien, Jon W. Schrock
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: eScholarship Publishing, University of California 2025-07-01
Series:Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
Online Access:https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5xq2x1q7
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849389998034386944
author Joseph O’Brien
Jon W. Schrock
author_facet Joseph O’Brien
Jon W. Schrock
author_sort Joseph O’Brien
collection DOAJ
description Objectives: Sepsis is a common presentation to the emergency department (ED) and represents a life-threatening syndrome with high mortality rates. The existing literature has conflicting findings regarding outcomes between sexes. Our goal in this study was to investigate the clinical presentation, interventions, and outcomes based on sex for sepsis in the ED. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study to identify patients presenting with sepsis to the ED. We employed the Global Collaborative Network from 119 international healthcare organizations in the TriNetX Research Network. Sepsis was defined according to International Classification of Diseases, 10 th Rev, codes. To evaluate sex differences in sepsis presentation, we collected data on age, comorbidities, sex, vital signs, laboratory values, medications, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, mechanical ventilation, and mortality at 30 days, 90 days, and one year. We used a 1:1 propensity score matching by age, race, comorbidities, and infection source to identify and balance potential risk factors across the study groups to investigate mortality, interventions, and intensive care unit admission trends. Data abstraction and analysis were conducted in the TriNetX platform. Results: In total, 920,160 patients were included in this study. The most common infection source for both females and males was respiratory, accounting for 40% and 46.2% of sepsis cases, respectively. After adjusting for urinary tract infection as an infection source, females were less likely to receive piperacillin-tazobactam (21% vs 23.6%; odds ratio [OR] 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75 – 0.77), vancomycin (32.9% vs 36%; OR, 0.87; 95% CI 0.86 – 0.88), and vasopressors (16.5% vs 17.6%; OR, 0.92; 95% CI 0.91 – 0.93). Females had a lower all-cause mortality at 30 days (12.1% vs 13%; OR 0.91; 95% CI 0.90 – 0.92), 90 days (17.1% vs 18.7%; OR 0.91; 95% CI 0.90 – 0.92), and one year (21.5% vs 23.3%; OR 0.90; 95% CI 0.89 – 0.91). Conclusion: Females demonstrated 10% lower odds of mortality from sepsis at 30 days, 90 days, and one year (absolute difference: 0.9%, 1.6%, 1.8%, respectively). Females were less likely to receive vasopressors, vancomycin, or piperacillin-tazobactam, even after accounting for urinary tract infection as the sepsis source.
format Article
id doaj-art-d56eb3567dcd4439be266a2b3a0d87b3
institution Kabale University
issn 1936-900X
1936-9018
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher eScholarship Publishing, University of California
record_format Article
series Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
spelling doaj-art-d56eb3567dcd4439be266a2b3a0d87b32025-08-20T03:41:47ZengeScholarship Publishing, University of CaliforniaWestern Journal of Emergency Medicine1936-900X1936-90182025-07-0126488088710.5811/westjem.40005wjem-26-880Sepsis Presentation, Interventions, and Outcome Differences Among Men and Women in the Emergency DepartmentJoseph O’Brien0Jon W. Schrock1Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Cleveland, OhioMetroHealth Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Cleveland, OhioObjectives: Sepsis is a common presentation to the emergency department (ED) and represents a life-threatening syndrome with high mortality rates. The existing literature has conflicting findings regarding outcomes between sexes. Our goal in this study was to investigate the clinical presentation, interventions, and outcomes based on sex for sepsis in the ED. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study to identify patients presenting with sepsis to the ED. We employed the Global Collaborative Network from 119 international healthcare organizations in the TriNetX Research Network. Sepsis was defined according to International Classification of Diseases, 10 th Rev, codes. To evaluate sex differences in sepsis presentation, we collected data on age, comorbidities, sex, vital signs, laboratory values, medications, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, mechanical ventilation, and mortality at 30 days, 90 days, and one year. We used a 1:1 propensity score matching by age, race, comorbidities, and infection source to identify and balance potential risk factors across the study groups to investigate mortality, interventions, and intensive care unit admission trends. Data abstraction and analysis were conducted in the TriNetX platform. Results: In total, 920,160 patients were included in this study. The most common infection source for both females and males was respiratory, accounting for 40% and 46.2% of sepsis cases, respectively. After adjusting for urinary tract infection as an infection source, females were less likely to receive piperacillin-tazobactam (21% vs 23.6%; odds ratio [OR] 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75 – 0.77), vancomycin (32.9% vs 36%; OR, 0.87; 95% CI 0.86 – 0.88), and vasopressors (16.5% vs 17.6%; OR, 0.92; 95% CI 0.91 – 0.93). Females had a lower all-cause mortality at 30 days (12.1% vs 13%; OR 0.91; 95% CI 0.90 – 0.92), 90 days (17.1% vs 18.7%; OR 0.91; 95% CI 0.90 – 0.92), and one year (21.5% vs 23.3%; OR 0.90; 95% CI 0.89 – 0.91). Conclusion: Females demonstrated 10% lower odds of mortality from sepsis at 30 days, 90 days, and one year (absolute difference: 0.9%, 1.6%, 1.8%, respectively). Females were less likely to receive vasopressors, vancomycin, or piperacillin-tazobactam, even after accounting for urinary tract infection as the sepsis source.https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5xq2x1q7
spellingShingle Joseph O’Brien
Jon W. Schrock
Sepsis Presentation, Interventions, and Outcome Differences Among Men and Women in the Emergency Department
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
title Sepsis Presentation, Interventions, and Outcome Differences Among Men and Women in the Emergency Department
title_full Sepsis Presentation, Interventions, and Outcome Differences Among Men and Women in the Emergency Department
title_fullStr Sepsis Presentation, Interventions, and Outcome Differences Among Men and Women in the Emergency Department
title_full_unstemmed Sepsis Presentation, Interventions, and Outcome Differences Among Men and Women in the Emergency Department
title_short Sepsis Presentation, Interventions, and Outcome Differences Among Men and Women in the Emergency Department
title_sort sepsis presentation interventions and outcome differences among men and women in the emergency department
url https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5xq2x1q7
work_keys_str_mv AT josephobrien sepsispresentationinterventionsandoutcomedifferencesamongmenandwomenintheemergencydepartment
AT jonwschrock sepsispresentationinterventionsandoutcomedifferencesamongmenandwomenintheemergencydepartment