Three-dimensional (3D) vs. conventional echo evaluation of ventricular function in patients with sepsis or septic shock: a prognostic value

Abstract Objectives Septic shock remains a major cause of ICU mortality, frequently associated with multi-organ dysfunction (J Crit Care 43:122-127, 2018). Cardiovascular involvement, including myocardial dysfunction, is common and significantly increases mortality rates to 70–90% (Br J Anaesth 119(...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abdelrahman K. Mohamed, Shereen M. El Gengeehy, Ahmed Abdelrahman Battah, Mohamed Hamdi Saleh, Soliman Belal
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer 2025-08-01
Series:Egyptian Journal of Critical Care Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1007/s44349-025-00027-z
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849226531730096128
author Abdelrahman K. Mohamed
Shereen M. El Gengeehy
Ahmed Abdelrahman Battah
Mohamed Hamdi Saleh
Soliman Belal
author_facet Abdelrahman K. Mohamed
Shereen M. El Gengeehy
Ahmed Abdelrahman Battah
Mohamed Hamdi Saleh
Soliman Belal
author_sort Abdelrahman K. Mohamed
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objectives Septic shock remains a major cause of ICU mortality, frequently associated with multi-organ dysfunction (J Crit Care 43:122-127, 2018). Cardiovascular involvement, including myocardial dysfunction, is common and significantly increases mortality rates to 70–90% (Br J Anaesth 119(4):583–594, 2017, J Intensive Care 4:22, 2016). While LV systolic dysfunction is well documented, its prognostic value in septic shock remains debated (Br J Anaesth 104(1):3–11, 2010, J Crit Care 27(3):319-e9, 2012), with inconsistent links between ejection fraction (EF) and outcomes (J Crit Care 27(3):319-e9, 2012, Ann Intern Med 100(4):483–90, 1984, Crit Care Med 36(6):1701–6, 2008). Recent studies suggest that three-dimensional (3D) echocardiography and speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE) may offer improved assessment over conventional two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography. This study aimed to compare the prognostic value of ventricular function assessed by 3D versus 2D echocardiography in sepsis and septic shock patients. Methods Fifty patients with sepsis or septic shock, as defined by the Surviving Sepsis Campaign, underwent echocardiographic assessment within 24 h of ICU admission. Left ventricular function was evaluated using 2D echocardiography with Simpson’s method, speckle-tracking echocardiography (2D-GLS), and 3D echocardiography (3D-EF and 3D-GLS). Results Patients were categorized into survival (36%) and non-survival (64%) groups. Cox regression analysis identified 2D-GLS as an independent predictor of mortality. GLS proved the strongest prognostic marker, outperforming EF in both 2D and 3D analyses. The Youden indices for 2D-GLS, 3D-GLS, 2D-EF, and 3D-EF were 0.87, 0.68, 0.75, and 0.59, respectively. Additionally, 2D-derived GLS and EF demonstrated better prognostic performance than their 3D equivalents. Conclusion 2D-GLS was independently associated with higher mortality risk in sepsis and septic shock and provided superior prognostic value compared to 3D-GLS. GLS outperformed EF as the strongest mortality predictor in both 2D and 3D modalities.
format Article
id doaj-art-d569aba0c2494e678a379ee9cdab1ed3
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-7303
2090-9209
language English
publishDate 2025-08-01
publisher Springer
record_format Article
series Egyptian Journal of Critical Care Medicine
spelling doaj-art-d569aba0c2494e678a379ee9cdab1ed32025-08-24T11:14:12ZengSpringerEgyptian Journal of Critical Care Medicine2090-73032090-92092025-08-011211810.1007/s44349-025-00027-zThree-dimensional (3D) vs. conventional echo evaluation of ventricular function in patients with sepsis or septic shock: a prognostic valueAbdelrahman K. Mohamed0Shereen M. El Gengeehy1Ahmed Abdelrahman Battah2Mohamed Hamdi Saleh3Soliman Belal4Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo UniversityCritical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo UniversityCritical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo UniversityCritical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo UniversityCritical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo UniversityAbstract Objectives Septic shock remains a major cause of ICU mortality, frequently associated with multi-organ dysfunction (J Crit Care 43:122-127, 2018). Cardiovascular involvement, including myocardial dysfunction, is common and significantly increases mortality rates to 70–90% (Br J Anaesth 119(4):583–594, 2017, J Intensive Care 4:22, 2016). While LV systolic dysfunction is well documented, its prognostic value in septic shock remains debated (Br J Anaesth 104(1):3–11, 2010, J Crit Care 27(3):319-e9, 2012), with inconsistent links between ejection fraction (EF) and outcomes (J Crit Care 27(3):319-e9, 2012, Ann Intern Med 100(4):483–90, 1984, Crit Care Med 36(6):1701–6, 2008). Recent studies suggest that three-dimensional (3D) echocardiography and speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE) may offer improved assessment over conventional two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography. This study aimed to compare the prognostic value of ventricular function assessed by 3D versus 2D echocardiography in sepsis and septic shock patients. Methods Fifty patients with sepsis or septic shock, as defined by the Surviving Sepsis Campaign, underwent echocardiographic assessment within 24 h of ICU admission. Left ventricular function was evaluated using 2D echocardiography with Simpson’s method, speckle-tracking echocardiography (2D-GLS), and 3D echocardiography (3D-EF and 3D-GLS). Results Patients were categorized into survival (36%) and non-survival (64%) groups. Cox regression analysis identified 2D-GLS as an independent predictor of mortality. GLS proved the strongest prognostic marker, outperforming EF in both 2D and 3D analyses. The Youden indices for 2D-GLS, 3D-GLS, 2D-EF, and 3D-EF were 0.87, 0.68, 0.75, and 0.59, respectively. Additionally, 2D-derived GLS and EF demonstrated better prognostic performance than their 3D equivalents. Conclusion 2D-GLS was independently associated with higher mortality risk in sepsis and septic shock and provided superior prognostic value compared to 3D-GLS. GLS outperformed EF as the strongest mortality predictor in both 2D and 3D modalities.https://doi.org/10.1007/s44349-025-00027-zSepsisSeptic shockSpeckle-tracking echocardiographyGlobal longitudinal strainThree-dimensional echocardiographyMortality prediction
spellingShingle Abdelrahman K. Mohamed
Shereen M. El Gengeehy
Ahmed Abdelrahman Battah
Mohamed Hamdi Saleh
Soliman Belal
Three-dimensional (3D) vs. conventional echo evaluation of ventricular function in patients with sepsis or septic shock: a prognostic value
Egyptian Journal of Critical Care Medicine
Sepsis
Septic shock
Speckle-tracking echocardiography
Global longitudinal strain
Three-dimensional echocardiography
Mortality prediction
title Three-dimensional (3D) vs. conventional echo evaluation of ventricular function in patients with sepsis or septic shock: a prognostic value
title_full Three-dimensional (3D) vs. conventional echo evaluation of ventricular function in patients with sepsis or septic shock: a prognostic value
title_fullStr Three-dimensional (3D) vs. conventional echo evaluation of ventricular function in patients with sepsis or septic shock: a prognostic value
title_full_unstemmed Three-dimensional (3D) vs. conventional echo evaluation of ventricular function in patients with sepsis or septic shock: a prognostic value
title_short Three-dimensional (3D) vs. conventional echo evaluation of ventricular function in patients with sepsis or septic shock: a prognostic value
title_sort three dimensional 3d vs conventional echo evaluation of ventricular function in patients with sepsis or septic shock a prognostic value
topic Sepsis
Septic shock
Speckle-tracking echocardiography
Global longitudinal strain
Three-dimensional echocardiography
Mortality prediction
url https://doi.org/10.1007/s44349-025-00027-z
work_keys_str_mv AT abdelrahmankmohamed threedimensional3dvsconventionalechoevaluationofventricularfunctioninpatientswithsepsisorsepticshockaprognosticvalue
AT shereenmelgengeehy threedimensional3dvsconventionalechoevaluationofventricularfunctioninpatientswithsepsisorsepticshockaprognosticvalue
AT ahmedabdelrahmanbattah threedimensional3dvsconventionalechoevaluationofventricularfunctioninpatientswithsepsisorsepticshockaprognosticvalue
AT mohamedhamdisaleh threedimensional3dvsconventionalechoevaluationofventricularfunctioninpatientswithsepsisorsepticshockaprognosticvalue
AT solimanbelal threedimensional3dvsconventionalechoevaluationofventricularfunctioninpatientswithsepsisorsepticshockaprognosticvalue