Comparing Soybean Productivity, Soil Health, and Economic Viability Under No-Tillage and Conventional Tillage in the Lower Mississippi Delta

No-tillage (NT) management protects soil from wind and water erosion and improves soil health. Uncertainty in farm production under location-specific NT practices poses challenges to adopting it by the farming community. To address this challenge, a 4-year study (2019–2022) was conducted on farm-siz...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Saseendran S. Anapalli, Mubvumba Partson, Srinivasa R. Pinnamaneni, Krishna N. Reddy, Jonathan K. Corser
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-01-01
Series:International Journal of Agronomy
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/ioa/8878397
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850211654630899712
author Saseendran S. Anapalli
Mubvumba Partson
Srinivasa R. Pinnamaneni
Krishna N. Reddy
Jonathan K. Corser
author_facet Saseendran S. Anapalli
Mubvumba Partson
Srinivasa R. Pinnamaneni
Krishna N. Reddy
Jonathan K. Corser
author_sort Saseendran S. Anapalli
collection DOAJ
description No-tillage (NT) management protects soil from wind and water erosion and improves soil health. Uncertainty in farm production under location-specific NT practices poses challenges to adopting it by the farming community. To address this challenge, a 4-year study (2019–2022) was conducted on farm-size plots (∼1.25 ha) focused on comparing soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.) yield and soil health benefits of an NT system with a conventional tillage (CT) system in silt loam soil. The NT and CT plots were under corn production over the previous 11 years. Compared to CT, in the 0–20 cm layer, soil bulk density (ρ), total nitrogen (TN), and soil organic carbon (C) increased, but field-saturated hydraulic conductivity (Kfs) decreased in the 10 cm below the soil surface under NT. Higher ρ was also noticed in the 10–30 cm soil. There were no significant differences between NT and CT in water stable aggregate stability for 0.25–0.5, 0.5–1.0, 1.0–2.0, and 2.0–4.0 mm aggregate classes. While the higher ρ and lower Kfs under NT can potentially restrict plant root expansion, the beneficial effects of C and TN appear to make up for those adverse effects, culminating in comparable seed yield returns. Over four years, soybean seed harvested from NT (5440 kg ha−1) was 1% less than CT (5480 kg ha−1). Therefore, adopting the NT system increases net returns by reducing tillage-associated expenses without compromising soybean yields in the Lower Mississippi Delta region, which can improve soil and water conservation.
format Article
id doaj-art-d55bf21343cd4960bb42d9684076d683
institution OA Journals
issn 1687-8167
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series International Journal of Agronomy
spelling doaj-art-d55bf21343cd4960bb42d9684076d6832025-08-20T02:09:31ZengWileyInternational Journal of Agronomy1687-81672025-01-01202510.1155/ioa/8878397Comparing Soybean Productivity, Soil Health, and Economic Viability Under No-Tillage and Conventional Tillage in the Lower Mississippi DeltaSaseendran S. Anapalli0Mubvumba Partson1Srinivasa R. Pinnamaneni2Krishna N. Reddy3Jonathan K. Corser4Crop Production Systems Research UnitCrop Production Systems Research UnitWestern Colorado Research CenterCrop Production Systems Research UnitDelta Research and Extension CenterNo-tillage (NT) management protects soil from wind and water erosion and improves soil health. Uncertainty in farm production under location-specific NT practices poses challenges to adopting it by the farming community. To address this challenge, a 4-year study (2019–2022) was conducted on farm-size plots (∼1.25 ha) focused on comparing soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.) yield and soil health benefits of an NT system with a conventional tillage (CT) system in silt loam soil. The NT and CT plots were under corn production over the previous 11 years. Compared to CT, in the 0–20 cm layer, soil bulk density (ρ), total nitrogen (TN), and soil organic carbon (C) increased, but field-saturated hydraulic conductivity (Kfs) decreased in the 10 cm below the soil surface under NT. Higher ρ was also noticed in the 10–30 cm soil. There were no significant differences between NT and CT in water stable aggregate stability for 0.25–0.5, 0.5–1.0, 1.0–2.0, and 2.0–4.0 mm aggregate classes. While the higher ρ and lower Kfs under NT can potentially restrict plant root expansion, the beneficial effects of C and TN appear to make up for those adverse effects, culminating in comparable seed yield returns. Over four years, soybean seed harvested from NT (5440 kg ha−1) was 1% less than CT (5480 kg ha−1). Therefore, adopting the NT system increases net returns by reducing tillage-associated expenses without compromising soybean yields in the Lower Mississippi Delta region, which can improve soil and water conservation.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/ioa/8878397
spellingShingle Saseendran S. Anapalli
Mubvumba Partson
Srinivasa R. Pinnamaneni
Krishna N. Reddy
Jonathan K. Corser
Comparing Soybean Productivity, Soil Health, and Economic Viability Under No-Tillage and Conventional Tillage in the Lower Mississippi Delta
International Journal of Agronomy
title Comparing Soybean Productivity, Soil Health, and Economic Viability Under No-Tillage and Conventional Tillage in the Lower Mississippi Delta
title_full Comparing Soybean Productivity, Soil Health, and Economic Viability Under No-Tillage and Conventional Tillage in the Lower Mississippi Delta
title_fullStr Comparing Soybean Productivity, Soil Health, and Economic Viability Under No-Tillage and Conventional Tillage in the Lower Mississippi Delta
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Soybean Productivity, Soil Health, and Economic Viability Under No-Tillage and Conventional Tillage in the Lower Mississippi Delta
title_short Comparing Soybean Productivity, Soil Health, and Economic Viability Under No-Tillage and Conventional Tillage in the Lower Mississippi Delta
title_sort comparing soybean productivity soil health and economic viability under no tillage and conventional tillage in the lower mississippi delta
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/ioa/8878397
work_keys_str_mv AT saseendransanapalli comparingsoybeanproductivitysoilhealthandeconomicviabilityundernotillageandconventionaltillageinthelowermississippidelta
AT mubvumbapartson comparingsoybeanproductivitysoilhealthandeconomicviabilityundernotillageandconventionaltillageinthelowermississippidelta
AT srinivasarpinnamaneni comparingsoybeanproductivitysoilhealthandeconomicviabilityundernotillageandconventionaltillageinthelowermississippidelta
AT krishnanreddy comparingsoybeanproductivitysoilhealthandeconomicviabilityundernotillageandconventionaltillageinthelowermississippidelta
AT jonathankcorser comparingsoybeanproductivitysoilhealthandeconomicviabilityundernotillageandconventionaltillageinthelowermississippidelta