Long‐term of epicardial radiofrequency ablation and benefit for recurrent ventricular arrhythmia in Brugada syndrome: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Abstract Background Brugada syndrome (BrS) is a rare cardiac channelopathy linked to an increased risk of ventricular arrhythmias (VA) and sudden cardiac death. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA), particularly epicardial ablation, is recommended for BrS patients with recurrent VA unresponsive to conventi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Arga Setyo Adji MD, Atiyatum Billah MD, Juliardi Eka Putra Sit MD, Bryan Gervais deLiyis MD, Angga Nugraha MD, Angela Puspita MD, FICEP, Abdillah Maulana Satrioaji MD, Ragil Nur Rosyadi MD, FIHA
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-06-01
Series:Journal of Arrhythmia
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.70073
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Background Brugada syndrome (BrS) is a rare cardiac channelopathy linked to an increased risk of ventricular arrhythmias (VA) and sudden cardiac death. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA), particularly epicardial ablation, is recommended for BrS patients with recurrent VA unresponsive to conventional treatments like implantable cardioverter‐defibrillators (ICD) and quinidine. This study aims to evaluate the long‐term efficacy of epicardial RFA in preventing VA recurrence in BrS. Methods A systematic search of PubMed, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, and ProQuest databases was conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Studies on RFA for VA in BrS were included. Primary outcomes were VA recurrence and all‐cause mortality. Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4. Results Epicardial, endocardial, and combined ablation strategies effectively reduced VA recurrence, decreased ICD shocks, and improved clinical outcomes in BrS. Epicardial ablation RFA near coronary arteries showed a notable reduction in VA recurrence, while endocardial ablation remained a viable alternative. Meta‐analysis revealed a significant reduction in VA recurrence (RR 0.17; 95% CI 0.07–0.43; p < .0001) and ICD shocks (RR 0.13; 95% CI 0.04–0.44; p = .001). Subgroup analysis suggested greater VA reduction with epicardial ablation, though without statistical significance. Conclusion Epicardial RFA is associated with a significant reduction in recurrent VAs (83%) and ICD shock rates (87%) in patients with BrS. The procedure demonstrates a favorable long‐term safety profile, with no mortality reported in the included studies.
ISSN:1880-4276
1883-2148