Timing of device reimplantation and reinfection rates following cardiac implantable electronic device infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives Initial management of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection requires removal of the infected CIED system and treatment with systemic antibiotics. However, the optimal timing to device reimplantation is unknown. The aim of this study was to quantify the incidence of reinfe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Derek Chew, Ranjani Somayaji, John Conly, Derek Exner, Elissa Rennert-May
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2019-09-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/9/e029537.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846159919669051392
author Derek Chew
Ranjani Somayaji
John Conly
Derek Exner
Elissa Rennert-May
author_facet Derek Chew
Ranjani Somayaji
John Conly
Derek Exner
Elissa Rennert-May
author_sort Derek Chew
collection DOAJ
description Objectives Initial management of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection requires removal of the infected CIED system and treatment with systemic antibiotics. However, the optimal timing to device reimplantation is unknown. The aim of this study was to quantify the incidence of reinfection after initial management of CIED infection, and to assess the effect of timing to reimplantation on reinfection rates.Design Systematic review and meta-analysis.Interventions A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed of studies published up to February 2018. Inclusion criteria were: (a) documented CIED infection, (b) studies that reported the timing to device reimplantation and (c) studies that reported the proportion of participants with device reinfection. A meta-analysis of proportions using a random effects model was performed to estimate the pooled device reinfection rate.Primary and secondary outcome measures The primary outcome measure was the rate of CIED reinfection. The secondary outcome was all-cause mortality.Results Of the 280 screened studies, 8 met inclusion criteria with an average of 96 participants per study (range 15–220 participants). The pooled incidence rate of device reinfection was 0.45% (95% CI, 0.02% to 1.23%) per person year. A longer time to device reimplantation >72 hours was associated with a trend towards higher rates of reinfection (unadjusted incident rate ratio 4.8; 95% CI 0.9 to 24.3, p=0.06); however, the meta-regression analysis was unable to adjust for important clinical covariates. There did not appear to be a difference in reinfection rates when time to reimplantation was stratified at 1 week. Heterogeneity was moderate (I2=61%).Conclusions The incident rate of reinfection following initial management of CIED infection is not insignificant. Time to reimplantation may affect subsequent rates of device reinfection. Our findings are considered exploratory and significant heterogeneity limits interpretation.PROSERO registration number CRD4201810960.
format Article
id doaj-art-d52646ac3f3e48b1b9ced4c4cb77b604
institution Kabale University
issn 2044-6055
language English
publishDate 2019-09-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BMJ Open
spelling doaj-art-d52646ac3f3e48b1b9ced4c4cb77b6042024-11-22T20:00:09ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552019-09-019910.1136/bmjopen-2019-029537Timing of device reimplantation and reinfection rates following cardiac implantable electronic device infection: a systematic review and meta-analysisDerek Chew0Ranjani Somayaji1John Conly2Derek Exner3Elissa Rennert-May42 Libin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, CanadaDepartment of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada4 O’Brien Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada1 Department of Cardiac Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada3 Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, CanadaObjectives Initial management of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection requires removal of the infected CIED system and treatment with systemic antibiotics. However, the optimal timing to device reimplantation is unknown. The aim of this study was to quantify the incidence of reinfection after initial management of CIED infection, and to assess the effect of timing to reimplantation on reinfection rates.Design Systematic review and meta-analysis.Interventions A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed of studies published up to February 2018. Inclusion criteria were: (a) documented CIED infection, (b) studies that reported the timing to device reimplantation and (c) studies that reported the proportion of participants with device reinfection. A meta-analysis of proportions using a random effects model was performed to estimate the pooled device reinfection rate.Primary and secondary outcome measures The primary outcome measure was the rate of CIED reinfection. The secondary outcome was all-cause mortality.Results Of the 280 screened studies, 8 met inclusion criteria with an average of 96 participants per study (range 15–220 participants). The pooled incidence rate of device reinfection was 0.45% (95% CI, 0.02% to 1.23%) per person year. A longer time to device reimplantation >72 hours was associated with a trend towards higher rates of reinfection (unadjusted incident rate ratio 4.8; 95% CI 0.9 to 24.3, p=0.06); however, the meta-regression analysis was unable to adjust for important clinical covariates. There did not appear to be a difference in reinfection rates when time to reimplantation was stratified at 1 week. Heterogeneity was moderate (I2=61%).Conclusions The incident rate of reinfection following initial management of CIED infection is not insignificant. Time to reimplantation may affect subsequent rates of device reinfection. Our findings are considered exploratory and significant heterogeneity limits interpretation.PROSERO registration number CRD4201810960.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/9/e029537.full
spellingShingle Derek Chew
Ranjani Somayaji
John Conly
Derek Exner
Elissa Rennert-May
Timing of device reimplantation and reinfection rates following cardiac implantable electronic device infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BMJ Open
title Timing of device reimplantation and reinfection rates following cardiac implantable electronic device infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Timing of device reimplantation and reinfection rates following cardiac implantable electronic device infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Timing of device reimplantation and reinfection rates following cardiac implantable electronic device infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Timing of device reimplantation and reinfection rates following cardiac implantable electronic device infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Timing of device reimplantation and reinfection rates following cardiac implantable electronic device infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort timing of device reimplantation and reinfection rates following cardiac implantable electronic device infection a systematic review and meta analysis
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/9/e029537.full
work_keys_str_mv AT derekchew timingofdevicereimplantationandreinfectionratesfollowingcardiacimplantableelectronicdeviceinfectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ranjanisomayaji timingofdevicereimplantationandreinfectionratesfollowingcardiacimplantableelectronicdeviceinfectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT johnconly timingofdevicereimplantationandreinfectionratesfollowingcardiacimplantableelectronicdeviceinfectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT derekexner timingofdevicereimplantationandreinfectionratesfollowingcardiacimplantableelectronicdeviceinfectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT elissarennertmay timingofdevicereimplantationandreinfectionratesfollowingcardiacimplantableelectronicdeviceinfectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis