REFORMING OF HIGHER EDUCATION IN THE UK: VALUE AND NORMATIVE DIMENSIONS
Abstract. Evolution strategy for reforming higher education in the UK during the transition from binary to a unitary system is considered in the context of existing alternative approaches to the choice of strategic priorities, forms and methods of educational process regulation, set out in the polic...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Moscow Polytechnic University
2017-02-01
|
| Series: | Высшее образование в России |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://vovr.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/937 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832574694269648896 |
|---|---|
| author | Elizaveta V. Zolotareva |
| author_facet | Elizaveta V. Zolotareva |
| author_sort | Elizaveta V. Zolotareva |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract. Evolution strategy for reforming higher education in the UK during the transition from binary to a unitary system is considered in the context of existing alternative approaches to the choice of strategic priorities, forms and methods of educational process regulation, set out in the policy reports of Lord Robbins (1963), Lord Dearing (1997) and Lord Browne (2010).The contradictory nature of neoliberal policy reforms in the last 25 years is seen as a reflection of tensions between the socioBcultural and economic functions of education, the underlying conflict between technocratic, social and humanistic approaches to solving the problem of higher education to adapt to the new technological and social reality of the twentyBfirst century. The conflict of interpretations by main political actors of such principles as social justice, freedom of choice, responsibility and efficiency is projected on their choice of strategy of forming «new» partnerships between educational subjects – universities, students, business and the state. Heuristic possibilities of using the method of critical discourseBanalysis to improve the regulatory framework in a crisis situation, and reducing risk in making innovative solutions, especially for young people, is considered by the example of the analysis of I. Fairclouch and N. Fairclouch parliamentary debate in 2010 to raise tuition fees in universities. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-d5253995a3334757b51f5d056d3bb129 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 0869-3617 2072-0459 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2017-02-01 |
| publisher | Moscow Polytechnic University |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Высшее образование в России |
| spelling | doaj-art-d5253995a3334757b51f5d056d3bb1292025-02-01T13:14:22ZengMoscow Polytechnic UniversityВысшее образование в России0869-36172072-04592017-02-0101156168936REFORMING OF HIGHER EDUCATION IN THE UK: VALUE AND NORMATIVE DIMENSIONSElizaveta V. Zolotareva0Peoples Friendship University of Russia, MoscowAbstract. Evolution strategy for reforming higher education in the UK during the transition from binary to a unitary system is considered in the context of existing alternative approaches to the choice of strategic priorities, forms and methods of educational process regulation, set out in the policy reports of Lord Robbins (1963), Lord Dearing (1997) and Lord Browne (2010).The contradictory nature of neoliberal policy reforms in the last 25 years is seen as a reflection of tensions between the socioBcultural and economic functions of education, the underlying conflict between technocratic, social and humanistic approaches to solving the problem of higher education to adapt to the new technological and social reality of the twentyBfirst century. The conflict of interpretations by main political actors of such principles as social justice, freedom of choice, responsibility and efficiency is projected on their choice of strategy of forming «new» partnerships between educational subjects – universities, students, business and the state. Heuristic possibilities of using the method of critical discourseBanalysis to improve the regulatory framework in a crisis situation, and reducing risk in making innovative solutions, especially for young people, is considered by the example of the analysis of I. Fairclouch and N. Fairclouch parliamentary debate in 2010 to raise tuition fees in universities.https://vovr.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/937higher education reforms in the uksocial normsregulation in the education spherelord dearing programmelord browne policyunitary systemcritical discourse-analysis |
| spellingShingle | Elizaveta V. Zolotareva REFORMING OF HIGHER EDUCATION IN THE UK: VALUE AND NORMATIVE DIMENSIONS Высшее образование в России higher education reforms in the uk social norms regulation in the education sphere lord dearing programme lord browne policy unitary system critical discourse-analysis |
| title | REFORMING OF HIGHER EDUCATION IN THE UK: VALUE AND NORMATIVE DIMENSIONS |
| title_full | REFORMING OF HIGHER EDUCATION IN THE UK: VALUE AND NORMATIVE DIMENSIONS |
| title_fullStr | REFORMING OF HIGHER EDUCATION IN THE UK: VALUE AND NORMATIVE DIMENSIONS |
| title_full_unstemmed | REFORMING OF HIGHER EDUCATION IN THE UK: VALUE AND NORMATIVE DIMENSIONS |
| title_short | REFORMING OF HIGHER EDUCATION IN THE UK: VALUE AND NORMATIVE DIMENSIONS |
| title_sort | reforming of higher education in the uk value and normative dimensions |
| topic | higher education reforms in the uk social norms regulation in the education sphere lord dearing programme lord browne policy unitary system critical discourse-analysis |
| url | https://vovr.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/937 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT elizavetavzolotareva reformingofhighereducationintheukvalueandnormativedimensions |