An Evaluation of the Performance of Remote Sensing Indices as an Indication of Spatial Variability and Vegetation Diversity in Alpine Grassland
Vegetation diversity is a crucial indicator for evaluating grassland ecosystems. Remote sensing technology has great potential in assessing grassland vegetation diversity. In this study, the relationship between remote sensing indices and species diversity was investigated at varying spatial and tem...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2024-12-01
|
| Series: | Remote Sensing |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/16/24/4726 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850238357209088000 |
|---|---|
| author | Yanan Sang Haibin Gu Qingmin Meng Xinna Men Jiandong Sheng Ning Li Ze Wang |
| author_facet | Yanan Sang Haibin Gu Qingmin Meng Xinna Men Jiandong Sheng Ning Li Ze Wang |
| author_sort | Yanan Sang |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Vegetation diversity is a crucial indicator for evaluating grassland ecosystems. Remote sensing technology has great potential in assessing grassland vegetation diversity. In this study, the relationship between remote sensing indices and species diversity was investigated at varying spatial and temporal scales in Bayanbulak Grassland National Nature Reserve, China. Spectral variation, defined as the coefficient of variation in vegetation indices, was used as a proxy for species diversity, which was quantified using species diversity indices. The “spectral diversity-species diversity” relationship was validated across diverse spatial scales and between different years using Sentinel-2 images and ground investigation data. This study found that Kendall’s τ coefficients showed the best performance in evaluating the relationship between the coefficient of variation in VIs (CV<sub>VIs</sub>) and species diversity index. The highest τ value was observed for CV<sub>NDVI</sub> in 2017 (τ = 0.660, <i>p</i> < 0.01), followed by the Shannon index in 2018 (τ = 0.451, <i>p</i> < 0.01). In addition, CV<sub>EVI</sub> demonstrated a significant positive correlation with the Shannon-Wiener Index at the 50 m scale (τ = 0.542), and the highest relationship τ between CV<sub>NDVI</sub> and the Shannon-Wiener Index was observed at the 100 m scale (τ = 0.660). The Shannon-Wiener Index in relation to CV<sub>VIs</sub> performs better in representing changes in grassland vegetation. Spatial scales and vegetation indices influence the assessment of grassland vegetation diversity. These findings underscore the critical role of remote sensing technology in assessing grassland vegetation diversity across various scales, offering valuable support tools for measuring regional grassland vegetation diversity. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-d504dd6c5e7a431f89e82cfabe92f63e |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 2072-4292 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-12-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Remote Sensing |
| spelling | doaj-art-d504dd6c5e7a431f89e82cfabe92f63e2025-08-20T02:01:29ZengMDPI AGRemote Sensing2072-42922024-12-011624472610.3390/rs16244726An Evaluation of the Performance of Remote Sensing Indices as an Indication of Spatial Variability and Vegetation Diversity in Alpine GrasslandYanan Sang0Haibin Gu1Qingmin Meng2Xinna Men3Jiandong Sheng4Ning Li5Ze Wang6The Green Production Engineering Technology Research Center of Xinjiang Planting Industry, Urumqi 830052, ChinaThe Green Production Engineering Technology Research Center of Xinjiang Planting Industry, Urumqi 830052, ChinaDepartment of Geosciences, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS 39762, USAThe Green Production Engineering Technology Research Center of Xinjiang Planting Industry, Urumqi 830052, ChinaThe Green Production Engineering Technology Research Center of Xinjiang Planting Industry, Urumqi 830052, ChinaThe Green Production Engineering Technology Research Center of Xinjiang Planting Industry, Urumqi 830052, ChinaThe Green Production Engineering Technology Research Center of Xinjiang Planting Industry, Urumqi 830052, ChinaVegetation diversity is a crucial indicator for evaluating grassland ecosystems. Remote sensing technology has great potential in assessing grassland vegetation diversity. In this study, the relationship between remote sensing indices and species diversity was investigated at varying spatial and temporal scales in Bayanbulak Grassland National Nature Reserve, China. Spectral variation, defined as the coefficient of variation in vegetation indices, was used as a proxy for species diversity, which was quantified using species diversity indices. The “spectral diversity-species diversity” relationship was validated across diverse spatial scales and between different years using Sentinel-2 images and ground investigation data. This study found that Kendall’s τ coefficients showed the best performance in evaluating the relationship between the coefficient of variation in VIs (CV<sub>VIs</sub>) and species diversity index. The highest τ value was observed for CV<sub>NDVI</sub> in 2017 (τ = 0.660, <i>p</i> < 0.01), followed by the Shannon index in 2018 (τ = 0.451, <i>p</i> < 0.01). In addition, CV<sub>EVI</sub> demonstrated a significant positive correlation with the Shannon-Wiener Index at the 50 m scale (τ = 0.542), and the highest relationship τ between CV<sub>NDVI</sub> and the Shannon-Wiener Index was observed at the 100 m scale (τ = 0.660). The Shannon-Wiener Index in relation to CV<sub>VIs</sub> performs better in representing changes in grassland vegetation. Spatial scales and vegetation indices influence the assessment of grassland vegetation diversity. These findings underscore the critical role of remote sensing technology in assessing grassland vegetation diversity across various scales, offering valuable support tools for measuring regional grassland vegetation diversity.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/16/24/4726grassland vegetation diversityvegetation indexspecies diversityspectral diversity |
| spellingShingle | Yanan Sang Haibin Gu Qingmin Meng Xinna Men Jiandong Sheng Ning Li Ze Wang An Evaluation of the Performance of Remote Sensing Indices as an Indication of Spatial Variability and Vegetation Diversity in Alpine Grassland Remote Sensing grassland vegetation diversity vegetation index species diversity spectral diversity |
| title | An Evaluation of the Performance of Remote Sensing Indices as an Indication of Spatial Variability and Vegetation Diversity in Alpine Grassland |
| title_full | An Evaluation of the Performance of Remote Sensing Indices as an Indication of Spatial Variability and Vegetation Diversity in Alpine Grassland |
| title_fullStr | An Evaluation of the Performance of Remote Sensing Indices as an Indication of Spatial Variability and Vegetation Diversity in Alpine Grassland |
| title_full_unstemmed | An Evaluation of the Performance of Remote Sensing Indices as an Indication of Spatial Variability and Vegetation Diversity in Alpine Grassland |
| title_short | An Evaluation of the Performance of Remote Sensing Indices as an Indication of Spatial Variability and Vegetation Diversity in Alpine Grassland |
| title_sort | evaluation of the performance of remote sensing indices as an indication of spatial variability and vegetation diversity in alpine grassland |
| topic | grassland vegetation diversity vegetation index species diversity spectral diversity |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/16/24/4726 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT yanansang anevaluationoftheperformanceofremotesensingindicesasanindicationofspatialvariabilityandvegetationdiversityinalpinegrassland AT haibingu anevaluationoftheperformanceofremotesensingindicesasanindicationofspatialvariabilityandvegetationdiversityinalpinegrassland AT qingminmeng anevaluationoftheperformanceofremotesensingindicesasanindicationofspatialvariabilityandvegetationdiversityinalpinegrassland AT xinnamen anevaluationoftheperformanceofremotesensingindicesasanindicationofspatialvariabilityandvegetationdiversityinalpinegrassland AT jiandongsheng anevaluationoftheperformanceofremotesensingindicesasanindicationofspatialvariabilityandvegetationdiversityinalpinegrassland AT ningli anevaluationoftheperformanceofremotesensingindicesasanindicationofspatialvariabilityandvegetationdiversityinalpinegrassland AT zewang anevaluationoftheperformanceofremotesensingindicesasanindicationofspatialvariabilityandvegetationdiversityinalpinegrassland AT yanansang evaluationoftheperformanceofremotesensingindicesasanindicationofspatialvariabilityandvegetationdiversityinalpinegrassland AT haibingu evaluationoftheperformanceofremotesensingindicesasanindicationofspatialvariabilityandvegetationdiversityinalpinegrassland AT qingminmeng evaluationoftheperformanceofremotesensingindicesasanindicationofspatialvariabilityandvegetationdiversityinalpinegrassland AT xinnamen evaluationoftheperformanceofremotesensingindicesasanindicationofspatialvariabilityandvegetationdiversityinalpinegrassland AT jiandongsheng evaluationoftheperformanceofremotesensingindicesasanindicationofspatialvariabilityandvegetationdiversityinalpinegrassland AT ningli evaluationoftheperformanceofremotesensingindicesasanindicationofspatialvariabilityandvegetationdiversityinalpinegrassland AT zewang evaluationoftheperformanceofremotesensingindicesasanindicationofspatialvariabilityandvegetationdiversityinalpinegrassland |