Comparative and functional genomic analysis of foreign DNA defense mechanisms in Enterococcus faecium
ABSTRACT Enterococcus faecium is notoriously difficult to study genetically due to the poor understanding of barriers preventing foreign DNA uptake, such as the proteins that modify type I restriction modification (RM) system activity. Here, we compared E. faecium repertoires of the HsdS specificity...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
American Society for Microbiology
2025-08-01
|
| Series: | Microbiology Spectrum |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/spectrum.00289-25 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850039177193717760 |
|---|---|
| author | Alexandra L. Krause Louise M. Judd Ryan Wick Timothy P. Stinear Andrew H. Buultjens Ian R. Monk |
| author_facet | Alexandra L. Krause Louise M. Judd Ryan Wick Timothy P. Stinear Andrew H. Buultjens Ian R. Monk |
| author_sort | Alexandra L. Krause |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | ABSTRACT Enterococcus faecium is notoriously difficult to study genetically due to the poor understanding of barriers preventing foreign DNA uptake, such as the proteins that modify type I restriction modification (RM) system activity. Here, we compared E. faecium repertoires of the HsdS specificity subunit (dictating the DNA motif that is adenine methylated) from type I RM systems among 805 globally reported E. faecium isolates. We showed there were eight distinct HsdS types, with four dominant variants that were also significantly enriched in the hospital-associated clade A1 E. faecium lineage. Adenine methylome analysis of a subset of eight representative E. faecium strains revealed that only two exhibited functional type I RM systems, with the activity corroborated by the construction of type I RM deletion mutants. To investigate this surprising finding, we assessed the contribution of the anti-restriction protein ArdA that specifically inhibits type I RM function. The E. faecium ST796 clinical isolate AUS0233 has one intact type I RM system, no adenine methylation, and two distinct ardA paralogs. When heterologously expressed in Staphylococcus aureus JE2, both E. faecium ardA variants were functional, each inhibiting the function of the two type I RM systems in S. aureus. However, the deletion of one or both versions of ardA in E. faecium AUS0233 did not change the transformation efficiency with exogenous DNA, suggesting ArdA in E. faecium AUS0233 is not controlling type I RM. This study highlights the complexity of DNA defense mechanisms in E. faecium and suggests that unidentified factors control the acquisition of foreign DNA.IMPORTANCEEnterococcus faecium has mechanisms of DNA methylation and targeted DNA degradation (called restriction modification [RM]) that hinder foreign DNA uptake, thus influencing the acquisition of important phenotypes such as antibiotic resistance. Restriction barriers also frustrate efforts for laboratory genetic manipulation used to study this pathogen. From PacBio analysis of E. faecium strains, it was observed that the majority of E. faecium do not adenine methylate DNA despite genome analysis indicating they have intact type I RM methylation systems. One explanation for this observation is that E. faecium produces anti-restriction factors such as ArdA, which can inhibit type I RM systems. However, the deletion of both ardA alleles did not improve the efficiency of DNA uptake. These findings build our foundational knowledge of how E. faecium controls foreign DNA and show there is additional complexity surrounding these systems to be discovered. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-d4c5db3a5c694b90a54ad510cd6dcb0c |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 2165-0497 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-08-01 |
| publisher | American Society for Microbiology |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Microbiology Spectrum |
| spelling | doaj-art-d4c5db3a5c694b90a54ad510cd6dcb0c2025-08-20T02:56:24ZengAmerican Society for MicrobiologyMicrobiology Spectrum2165-04972025-08-0113810.1128/spectrum.00289-25Comparative and functional genomic analysis of foreign DNA defense mechanisms in Enterococcus faeciumAlexandra L. Krause0Louise M. Judd1Ryan Wick2Timothy P. Stinear3Andrew H. Buultjens4Ian R. Monk5Department of Microbiology and Immunology, The University of Melbourne, at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Victoria, AustraliaDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, The University of Melbourne, at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Victoria, AustraliaDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, The University of Melbourne, at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Victoria, AustraliaDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, The University of Melbourne, at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Victoria, AustraliaDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, The University of Melbourne, at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Victoria, AustraliaDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, The University of Melbourne, at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Victoria, AustraliaABSTRACT Enterococcus faecium is notoriously difficult to study genetically due to the poor understanding of barriers preventing foreign DNA uptake, such as the proteins that modify type I restriction modification (RM) system activity. Here, we compared E. faecium repertoires of the HsdS specificity subunit (dictating the DNA motif that is adenine methylated) from type I RM systems among 805 globally reported E. faecium isolates. We showed there were eight distinct HsdS types, with four dominant variants that were also significantly enriched in the hospital-associated clade A1 E. faecium lineage. Adenine methylome analysis of a subset of eight representative E. faecium strains revealed that only two exhibited functional type I RM systems, with the activity corroborated by the construction of type I RM deletion mutants. To investigate this surprising finding, we assessed the contribution of the anti-restriction protein ArdA that specifically inhibits type I RM function. The E. faecium ST796 clinical isolate AUS0233 has one intact type I RM system, no adenine methylation, and two distinct ardA paralogs. When heterologously expressed in Staphylococcus aureus JE2, both E. faecium ardA variants were functional, each inhibiting the function of the two type I RM systems in S. aureus. However, the deletion of one or both versions of ardA in E. faecium AUS0233 did not change the transformation efficiency with exogenous DNA, suggesting ArdA in E. faecium AUS0233 is not controlling type I RM. This study highlights the complexity of DNA defense mechanisms in E. faecium and suggests that unidentified factors control the acquisition of foreign DNA.IMPORTANCEEnterococcus faecium has mechanisms of DNA methylation and targeted DNA degradation (called restriction modification [RM]) that hinder foreign DNA uptake, thus influencing the acquisition of important phenotypes such as antibiotic resistance. Restriction barriers also frustrate efforts for laboratory genetic manipulation used to study this pathogen. From PacBio analysis of E. faecium strains, it was observed that the majority of E. faecium do not adenine methylate DNA despite genome analysis indicating they have intact type I RM methylation systems. One explanation for this observation is that E. faecium produces anti-restriction factors such as ArdA, which can inhibit type I RM systems. However, the deletion of both ardA alleles did not improve the efficiency of DNA uptake. These findings build our foundational knowledge of how E. faecium controls foreign DNA and show there is additional complexity surrounding these systems to be discovered.https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/spectrum.00289-25Enterococcus faeciumgenomicsDNA defense mechanismsrestriction modification systemhsdS |
| spellingShingle | Alexandra L. Krause Louise M. Judd Ryan Wick Timothy P. Stinear Andrew H. Buultjens Ian R. Monk Comparative and functional genomic analysis of foreign DNA defense mechanisms in Enterococcus faecium Microbiology Spectrum Enterococcus faecium genomics DNA defense mechanisms restriction modification system hsdS |
| title | Comparative and functional genomic analysis of foreign DNA defense mechanisms in Enterococcus faecium |
| title_full | Comparative and functional genomic analysis of foreign DNA defense mechanisms in Enterococcus faecium |
| title_fullStr | Comparative and functional genomic analysis of foreign DNA defense mechanisms in Enterococcus faecium |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparative and functional genomic analysis of foreign DNA defense mechanisms in Enterococcus faecium |
| title_short | Comparative and functional genomic analysis of foreign DNA defense mechanisms in Enterococcus faecium |
| title_sort | comparative and functional genomic analysis of foreign dna defense mechanisms in enterococcus faecium |
| topic | Enterococcus faecium genomics DNA defense mechanisms restriction modification system hsdS |
| url | https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/spectrum.00289-25 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT alexandralkrause comparativeandfunctionalgenomicanalysisofforeigndnadefensemechanismsinenterococcusfaecium AT louisemjudd comparativeandfunctionalgenomicanalysisofforeigndnadefensemechanismsinenterococcusfaecium AT ryanwick comparativeandfunctionalgenomicanalysisofforeigndnadefensemechanismsinenterococcusfaecium AT timothypstinear comparativeandfunctionalgenomicanalysisofforeigndnadefensemechanismsinenterococcusfaecium AT andrewhbuultjens comparativeandfunctionalgenomicanalysisofforeigndnadefensemechanismsinenterococcusfaecium AT ianrmonk comparativeandfunctionalgenomicanalysisofforeigndnadefensemechanismsinenterococcusfaecium |