Artificial Attractants: Implications for Disease Management in Deer
ABSTRACTChronic wasting disease (CWD) is a prion disease that infects cervid species by direct and environmental transmission and is invariably fatal. CWD spread can be promoted by the attraction of animals to “hotspots” such as hay bales and grain bags stored in fields and at farm sites. The densit...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2025-02-01
|
| Series: | Ecology and Evolution |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.71013 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849387607228678144 |
|---|---|
| author | Kelsey Gritter Margo Pybus Mark A. Lewis Evelyn Merrill |
| author_facet | Kelsey Gritter Margo Pybus Mark A. Lewis Evelyn Merrill |
| author_sort | Kelsey Gritter |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | ABSTRACTChronic wasting disease (CWD) is a prion disease that infects cervid species by direct and environmental transmission and is invariably fatal. CWD spread can be promoted by the attraction of animals to “hotspots” such as hay bales and grain bags stored in fields and at farm sites. The density and location of hotspots may impact contact rates. We used an individual‐based movement model of mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) to investigate the effects of density and configuration of hotspots (hereafter artificial attractants, AA) on contact rates at a constant density of 1 deer/km2 during winter. The model tracks when two deer from the same or different groups come into contact under 6 AA densities (0–1 AA/km2) and 6 AA configurations. We compared placing AA randomly versus clustered around farms, and removing them randomly versus biased by proximity to preferred habitat. Overall, the number of unique contacts per individual and the number of unique deer visiting an AA increased, and the number of AAs used by each deer decreased as AA density declined. Selectively removing field attractants near preferred habitat resulted in a larger increase in contacts per deer, with deer contacting more and different individuals, fewer deer using the remaining AA, and fewer visits per AA than random removal. There was a greater increase in contact rates when reducing AA density at farms by randomly removing all AA at a farm compared to randomly removing individual AA across farms. Deer responses to AA removal may not be as straightforward as originally believed. Deer contacts may increase, not decrease, with AA removal because deer are attracted to the remaining AA. Under moderate deer densities, AA removal may require a broad‐scale, “all or nothing” approach to prevent deer from concentrating at remaining AA, but concomitantly lowering deer density needs further assessment. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-d4c01509b8a2411cb865028620954b48 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2045-7758 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-02-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Ecology and Evolution |
| spelling | doaj-art-d4c01509b8a2411cb865028620954b482025-08-20T03:51:30ZengWileyEcology and Evolution2045-77582025-02-01152n/an/a10.1002/ece3.71013Artificial Attractants: Implications for Disease Management in DeerKelsey Gritter0Margo Pybus1Mark A. Lewis2Evelyn Merrill3Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonAlbertaCanadaDepartment of Biological SciencesUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonAlbertaCanadaDepartment of Biological SciencesUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonAlbertaCanadaDepartment of Biological SciencesUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonAlbertaCanadaABSTRACTChronic wasting disease (CWD) is a prion disease that infects cervid species by direct and environmental transmission and is invariably fatal. CWD spread can be promoted by the attraction of animals to “hotspots” such as hay bales and grain bags stored in fields and at farm sites. The density and location of hotspots may impact contact rates. We used an individual‐based movement model of mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) to investigate the effects of density and configuration of hotspots (hereafter artificial attractants, AA) on contact rates at a constant density of 1 deer/km2 during winter. The model tracks when two deer from the same or different groups come into contact under 6 AA densities (0–1 AA/km2) and 6 AA configurations. We compared placing AA randomly versus clustered around farms, and removing them randomly versus biased by proximity to preferred habitat. Overall, the number of unique contacts per individual and the number of unique deer visiting an AA increased, and the number of AAs used by each deer decreased as AA density declined. Selectively removing field attractants near preferred habitat resulted in a larger increase in contacts per deer, with deer contacting more and different individuals, fewer deer using the remaining AA, and fewer visits per AA than random removal. There was a greater increase in contact rates when reducing AA density at farms by randomly removing all AA at a farm compared to randomly removing individual AA across farms. Deer responses to AA removal may not be as straightforward as originally believed. Deer contacts may increase, not decrease, with AA removal because deer are attracted to the remaining AA. Under moderate deer densities, AA removal may require a broad‐scale, “all or nothing” approach to prevent deer from concentrating at remaining AA, but concomitantly lowering deer density needs further assessment.https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.71013attractantschronic wasting diseasecontactsindividual‐based modelmule deerOdocoileus |
| spellingShingle | Kelsey Gritter Margo Pybus Mark A. Lewis Evelyn Merrill Artificial Attractants: Implications for Disease Management in Deer Ecology and Evolution attractants chronic wasting disease contacts individual‐based model mule deer Odocoileus |
| title | Artificial Attractants: Implications for Disease Management in Deer |
| title_full | Artificial Attractants: Implications for Disease Management in Deer |
| title_fullStr | Artificial Attractants: Implications for Disease Management in Deer |
| title_full_unstemmed | Artificial Attractants: Implications for Disease Management in Deer |
| title_short | Artificial Attractants: Implications for Disease Management in Deer |
| title_sort | artificial attractants implications for disease management in deer |
| topic | attractants chronic wasting disease contacts individual‐based model mule deer Odocoileus |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.71013 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT kelseygritter artificialattractantsimplicationsfordiseasemanagementindeer AT margopybus artificialattractantsimplicationsfordiseasemanagementindeer AT markalewis artificialattractantsimplicationsfordiseasemanagementindeer AT evelynmerrill artificialattractantsimplicationsfordiseasemanagementindeer |