Plasticity of the Primary Motor Cortex in Patients with Primary Brain Tumors

There are two neuron-level mechanisms proposed to underlie neural plasticity: recruiting neurons nearby to support the lost function (ipsilesional plasticity) and uncovering latent pathways that can assume the function that was lost (contralesional plasticity). While both patterns have been demonstr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nathan W. Kong, William R. Gibb, Suvarna Badhe, Benjamin P. Liu, Matthew C. Tate
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-01-01
Series:Neural Plasticity
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/3648517
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832566025940369408
author Nathan W. Kong
William R. Gibb
Suvarna Badhe
Benjamin P. Liu
Matthew C. Tate
author_facet Nathan W. Kong
William R. Gibb
Suvarna Badhe
Benjamin P. Liu
Matthew C. Tate
author_sort Nathan W. Kong
collection DOAJ
description There are two neuron-level mechanisms proposed to underlie neural plasticity: recruiting neurons nearby to support the lost function (ipsilesional plasticity) and uncovering latent pathways that can assume the function that was lost (contralesional plasticity). While both patterns have been demonstrated in patient groups following injury, the specific mechanisms underlying each mode of plasticity are poorly understood. In a retrospective case series of 13 patients, we utilize a novel paradigm that analyzes serial fMRI scans in patients harboring intrinsic brain tumors that vary in location and growth kinetics to better understand the mechanisms underlying these two modes of plasticity in the human primary motor cortex. Twelve patients in our series had some degree of primary motor cortex plasticity, an area previously thought to have limited plasticity. Patients harboring smaller lesions with slower growth kinetics and increasing distance from the primary motor region demonstrated recruitment of ipsilateral motor regions. Conversely, larger, faster-growing lesions in close proximity to the primary motor region were associated with activation of the contralesional primary motor cortex, along with increased activation of the supplementary motor area. These data increase our understanding of the adaptive abilities of the brain and may lead to improved treatment strategies for those suffering from motor loss secondary to brain injuries.
format Article
id doaj-art-d4ad440e54374476b15f6a241bde8b29
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-5904
1687-5443
language English
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Neural Plasticity
spelling doaj-art-d4ad440e54374476b15f6a241bde8b292025-02-03T01:05:22ZengWileyNeural Plasticity2090-59041687-54432020-01-01202010.1155/2020/36485173648517Plasticity of the Primary Motor Cortex in Patients with Primary Brain TumorsNathan W. Kong0William R. Gibb1Suvarna Badhe2Benjamin P. Liu3Matthew C. Tate4Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USADepartment of Emergency Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USADepartment of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USADepartment of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USADepartments of Neurological Surgery and Neurology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago IL, USAThere are two neuron-level mechanisms proposed to underlie neural plasticity: recruiting neurons nearby to support the lost function (ipsilesional plasticity) and uncovering latent pathways that can assume the function that was lost (contralesional plasticity). While both patterns have been demonstrated in patient groups following injury, the specific mechanisms underlying each mode of plasticity are poorly understood. In a retrospective case series of 13 patients, we utilize a novel paradigm that analyzes serial fMRI scans in patients harboring intrinsic brain tumors that vary in location and growth kinetics to better understand the mechanisms underlying these two modes of plasticity in the human primary motor cortex. Twelve patients in our series had some degree of primary motor cortex plasticity, an area previously thought to have limited plasticity. Patients harboring smaller lesions with slower growth kinetics and increasing distance from the primary motor region demonstrated recruitment of ipsilateral motor regions. Conversely, larger, faster-growing lesions in close proximity to the primary motor region were associated with activation of the contralesional primary motor cortex, along with increased activation of the supplementary motor area. These data increase our understanding of the adaptive abilities of the brain and may lead to improved treatment strategies for those suffering from motor loss secondary to brain injuries.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/3648517
spellingShingle Nathan W. Kong
William R. Gibb
Suvarna Badhe
Benjamin P. Liu
Matthew C. Tate
Plasticity of the Primary Motor Cortex in Patients with Primary Brain Tumors
Neural Plasticity
title Plasticity of the Primary Motor Cortex in Patients with Primary Brain Tumors
title_full Plasticity of the Primary Motor Cortex in Patients with Primary Brain Tumors
title_fullStr Plasticity of the Primary Motor Cortex in Patients with Primary Brain Tumors
title_full_unstemmed Plasticity of the Primary Motor Cortex in Patients with Primary Brain Tumors
title_short Plasticity of the Primary Motor Cortex in Patients with Primary Brain Tumors
title_sort plasticity of the primary motor cortex in patients with primary brain tumors
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/3648517
work_keys_str_mv AT nathanwkong plasticityoftheprimarymotorcortexinpatientswithprimarybraintumors
AT williamrgibb plasticityoftheprimarymotorcortexinpatientswithprimarybraintumors
AT suvarnabadhe plasticityoftheprimarymotorcortexinpatientswithprimarybraintumors
AT benjaminpliu plasticityoftheprimarymotorcortexinpatientswithprimarybraintumors
AT matthewctate plasticityoftheprimarymotorcortexinpatientswithprimarybraintumors