The Elephant in the Room: NAMUDNO, Shelby County, and Racially Polarized Voting
A key provision of the Voting Rights Act was rendered ineffective by the U.S. Supreme Court in a 5 to 4 decision in 2013. The provision, focused primarily on governments in the South, required them to gain federal “preclearance” for changes in their election arrangements before they could be impleme...
Saved in:
Main Author: | Richard L. Engstrom |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Association Française d'Etudes Américaines
2015-04-01
|
Series: | Transatlantica |
Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/transatlantica/7427 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Do The Facts of Voting Rights Support Chief Justice Roberts’s Opinion in Shelby County?
by: Morgan Kousser
Published: (2016-01-01) -
The Voting Rights Act After Shelby County v. Holder: A Potential Fix to Revive Section 5
by: Thomas L. Brunell, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01) -
NUTRITION IN TYPE II DIABETES MELLITUS THE ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM
by: Peter Baillie
Published: (2024-10-01) -
Axial Spondyloarthritis in Black Americans: An Observational Study From Five Centers in Shelby County, Tennessee
by: Krishna Kommineni, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
Paul Carmignani. Shelby Foote. Un sudiste au carré.
by: Michel Bandry
Published: (2006-04-01)