Tele-AAC Resolution

<p><span style="font-family: Cambria; font-size: small;">Approximately 1.3% of all people, or about 4 million Americans, cannot rely on their natural speech to meet their daily communication needs. Telepractice offers a potentially cost-effective service delivery mechanism to p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kate Anderson, Michelle K. Boisvert, Janis Doneski-Nicol, Michelle L. Gutmann, Nerissa C. Hall, Cynthia Morelock, Richard Steele, Ellen R. Cohn
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hawaii Pacific University Library 2012-12-01
Series:International Journal of Telerehabilitation
Online Access:http://telerehab.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/Telerehab/article/view/6106
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850273820939649024
author Kate Anderson
Michelle K. Boisvert
Janis Doneski-Nicol
Michelle L. Gutmann
Nerissa C. Hall
Cynthia Morelock
Richard Steele
Ellen R. Cohn
author_facet Kate Anderson
Michelle K. Boisvert
Janis Doneski-Nicol
Michelle L. Gutmann
Nerissa C. Hall
Cynthia Morelock
Richard Steele
Ellen R. Cohn
author_sort Kate Anderson
collection DOAJ
description <p><span style="font-family: Cambria; font-size: small;">Approximately 1.3% of all people, or about 4 million Americans, cannot rely on their natural speech to meet their daily communication needs. Telepractice offers a potentially cost-effective service delivery mechanism to provide clinical AAC services at a distance to the benefit of underserved populations in the United States and worldwide<strong>.</strong>  Tele-AAC is a unique cross-disciplinary clinical service delivery model that requires expertise in both telepractice and augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) systems.  The Tele-AAC Working Group of the 2012 ISAAC Research Symposium therefore drafted a resolution underscoring the importance of identifying and characterizing the unique opportunities and constraints of Tele-AAC in all aspects of service delivery. These include, but are not limited to: needs assessments; implementation planning; device/system procurement, set-up and training; quality assurance, client progress monitoring, and follow-up service delivery. </span><span style="font-family: Cambria; font-size: small;">Tele-AAC, like other telepractice applications, requires adherence to the ASHA Code of Ethics and other policy documents, and state, federal, and international laws, as well as a competent technological infrastructure. </span><span style="font-family: Cambria; font-size: small;">The Working Group recommends that institutions of higher education and professional organizations provide training in Tele-AAC service provision. In addition, research and development are needed to create validity measures across Tele-AAC practices (i.e., assessment, implementation, and consultation); determine the communication competence levels achieved  by Tele-AAC users; discern stakeholders’  perceptions of Tele-AAC services (e.g., acceptability and viability); maximize Tele-AAC’s capacity to engage multiple team members in AAC assessment and ongoing service; identify the limitations and barriers of Tele-AAC provision; and develop potential solutions</span><em><span style="font-family: Cambria; font-size: small;">.</span></em></p><p><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"> </span></p>
format Article
id doaj-art-d486a62e1a5f422da0db106e2a009ce1
institution OA Journals
issn 1945-2020
language English
publishDate 2012-12-01
publisher Hawaii Pacific University Library
record_format Article
series International Journal of Telerehabilitation
spelling doaj-art-d486a62e1a5f422da0db106e2a009ce12025-08-20T01:51:20ZengHawaii Pacific University LibraryInternational Journal of Telerehabilitation1945-20202012-12-014210.5195/ijt.2012.61065940Tele-AAC ResolutionKate Anderson0Michelle K. Boisvert1Janis Doneski-Nicol2Michelle L. Gutmann3Nerissa C. Hall4Cynthia Morelock5Richard Steele6Ellen R. Cohn7University of Sydney, AustraliaUniversity of Massachusetts, Amherst, MAUniversity of Massachusetts, Amherst, MADepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TNUniversity of Massachusetts, Amherst, MAThe Children’s Institute of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PALingraphica, Princeton, NJUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA<p><span style="font-family: Cambria; font-size: small;">Approximately 1.3% of all people, or about 4 million Americans, cannot rely on their natural speech to meet their daily communication needs. Telepractice offers a potentially cost-effective service delivery mechanism to provide clinical AAC services at a distance to the benefit of underserved populations in the United States and worldwide<strong>.</strong>  Tele-AAC is a unique cross-disciplinary clinical service delivery model that requires expertise in both telepractice and augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) systems.  The Tele-AAC Working Group of the 2012 ISAAC Research Symposium therefore drafted a resolution underscoring the importance of identifying and characterizing the unique opportunities and constraints of Tele-AAC in all aspects of service delivery. These include, but are not limited to: needs assessments; implementation planning; device/system procurement, set-up and training; quality assurance, client progress monitoring, and follow-up service delivery. </span><span style="font-family: Cambria; font-size: small;">Tele-AAC, like other telepractice applications, requires adherence to the ASHA Code of Ethics and other policy documents, and state, federal, and international laws, as well as a competent technological infrastructure. </span><span style="font-family: Cambria; font-size: small;">The Working Group recommends that institutions of higher education and professional organizations provide training in Tele-AAC service provision. In addition, research and development are needed to create validity measures across Tele-AAC practices (i.e., assessment, implementation, and consultation); determine the communication competence levels achieved  by Tele-AAC users; discern stakeholders’  perceptions of Tele-AAC services (e.g., acceptability and viability); maximize Tele-AAC’s capacity to engage multiple team members in AAC assessment and ongoing service; identify the limitations and barriers of Tele-AAC provision; and develop potential solutions</span><em><span style="font-family: Cambria; font-size: small;">.</span></em></p><p><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"> </span></p>http://telerehab.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/Telerehab/article/view/6106
spellingShingle Kate Anderson
Michelle K. Boisvert
Janis Doneski-Nicol
Michelle L. Gutmann
Nerissa C. Hall
Cynthia Morelock
Richard Steele
Ellen R. Cohn
Tele-AAC Resolution
International Journal of Telerehabilitation
title Tele-AAC Resolution
title_full Tele-AAC Resolution
title_fullStr Tele-AAC Resolution
title_full_unstemmed Tele-AAC Resolution
title_short Tele-AAC Resolution
title_sort tele aac resolution
url http://telerehab.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/Telerehab/article/view/6106
work_keys_str_mv AT kateanderson teleaacresolution
AT michellekboisvert teleaacresolution
AT janisdoneskinicol teleaacresolution
AT michellelgutmann teleaacresolution
AT nerissachall teleaacresolution
AT cynthiamorelock teleaacresolution
AT richardsteele teleaacresolution
AT ellenrcohn teleaacresolution