Principles for increasing equity in WASH research: understanding barriers faced by LMIC WASH researchers

Introduction There have long been critiques of colonial legacies influencing global health. With growing public awareness of unjust systems in recent years, a new wave of calls for antiracist and decolonisation initiatives has emerged within the sector. This study examined research inequities in the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: J'Anna-Mare Lue, Salamata Bah, Kaelah Grant, Justine Lee, Leila Nzekele, James B. Tidwell
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2023-04-01
Series:BMJ Global Health
Online Access:https://gh.bmj.com/content/8/4/e010990.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832575401114730496
author J'Anna-Mare Lue
Salamata Bah
Kaelah Grant
Justine Lee
Leila Nzekele
James B. Tidwell
author_facet J'Anna-Mare Lue
Salamata Bah
Kaelah Grant
Justine Lee
Leila Nzekele
James B. Tidwell
author_sort J'Anna-Mare Lue
collection DOAJ
description Introduction There have long been critiques of colonial legacies influencing global health. With growing public awareness of unjust systems in recent years, a new wave of calls for antiracist and decolonisation initiatives has emerged within the sector. This study examined research inequities in the water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) sector, centring the perspectives of researchers from low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs), to identify barriers faced by WASH researchers in order to support more equitable changes in this subsector of global health.Methods Nineteen semistructured interviews were conducted with researchers of different backgrounds regarding nationality, gender and research experience. Researchers from eight countries were asked about their experiences and direct observations of discrimination across various stages of the research process. Five interviews were conducted with key WASH research funders to assess perceptions of obstacles faced by LMIC researchers, successes achieved and challenges faced by these organisations when working towards more equitable research processes within the WASH sector.Results The results were analysed using an emergent framework that categorised experiences based on power differentials and abuse of power; structural barriers due to organisational policies; institutional and individual indifference; othering speech, action and practices; and context-specific discrimination. The social-ecological model was combined with this framework to identify the types of actors and the level of co-ordination needed to address these issues. Researchers who worked in both LMICs and high-income countries at different career stages were particularly aware of discrimination. Ensuring pro-equity authorship and funding practices were identified as two significant actions to catalyse change within the sector.Conclusion Sector-wide efforts must centre LMIC voices when identifying research questions, conducting research, and in dissemination. Individuals, organisations and the entire WASH sector must examine how they participate in upholding inequitable systems of power to begin to dismantle the system through the intentional yielding of power and resources.
format Article
id doaj-art-d46a77a2259e474ba55e91b753808305
institution Kabale University
issn 2059-7908
language English
publishDate 2023-04-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BMJ Global Health
spelling doaj-art-d46a77a2259e474ba55e91b7538083052025-02-01T09:05:10ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Global Health2059-79082023-04-018410.1136/bmjgh-2022-010990Principles for increasing equity in WASH research: understanding barriers faced by LMIC WASH researchersJ'Anna-Mare Lue0Salamata Bah1Kaelah Grant2Justine Lee3Leila Nzekele4James B. Tidwell5Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USAComputer Science, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USAPsychology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USAInternational Programs Group, World Vision, Washington, DC, USAPublic Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USAInternational Programs Group, World Vision, Washington, DC, USAIntroduction There have long been critiques of colonial legacies influencing global health. With growing public awareness of unjust systems in recent years, a new wave of calls for antiracist and decolonisation initiatives has emerged within the sector. This study examined research inequities in the water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) sector, centring the perspectives of researchers from low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs), to identify barriers faced by WASH researchers in order to support more equitable changes in this subsector of global health.Methods Nineteen semistructured interviews were conducted with researchers of different backgrounds regarding nationality, gender and research experience. Researchers from eight countries were asked about their experiences and direct observations of discrimination across various stages of the research process. Five interviews were conducted with key WASH research funders to assess perceptions of obstacles faced by LMIC researchers, successes achieved and challenges faced by these organisations when working towards more equitable research processes within the WASH sector.Results The results were analysed using an emergent framework that categorised experiences based on power differentials and abuse of power; structural barriers due to organisational policies; institutional and individual indifference; othering speech, action and practices; and context-specific discrimination. The social-ecological model was combined with this framework to identify the types of actors and the level of co-ordination needed to address these issues. Researchers who worked in both LMICs and high-income countries at different career stages were particularly aware of discrimination. Ensuring pro-equity authorship and funding practices were identified as two significant actions to catalyse change within the sector.Conclusion Sector-wide efforts must centre LMIC voices when identifying research questions, conducting research, and in dissemination. Individuals, organisations and the entire WASH sector must examine how they participate in upholding inequitable systems of power to begin to dismantle the system through the intentional yielding of power and resources.https://gh.bmj.com/content/8/4/e010990.full
spellingShingle J'Anna-Mare Lue
Salamata Bah
Kaelah Grant
Justine Lee
Leila Nzekele
James B. Tidwell
Principles for increasing equity in WASH research: understanding barriers faced by LMIC WASH researchers
BMJ Global Health
title Principles for increasing equity in WASH research: understanding barriers faced by LMIC WASH researchers
title_full Principles for increasing equity in WASH research: understanding barriers faced by LMIC WASH researchers
title_fullStr Principles for increasing equity in WASH research: understanding barriers faced by LMIC WASH researchers
title_full_unstemmed Principles for increasing equity in WASH research: understanding barriers faced by LMIC WASH researchers
title_short Principles for increasing equity in WASH research: understanding barriers faced by LMIC WASH researchers
title_sort principles for increasing equity in wash research understanding barriers faced by lmic wash researchers
url https://gh.bmj.com/content/8/4/e010990.full
work_keys_str_mv AT jannamarelue principlesforincreasingequityinwashresearchunderstandingbarriersfacedbylmicwashresearchers
AT salamatabah principlesforincreasingequityinwashresearchunderstandingbarriersfacedbylmicwashresearchers
AT kaelahgrant principlesforincreasingequityinwashresearchunderstandingbarriersfacedbylmicwashresearchers
AT justinelee principlesforincreasingequityinwashresearchunderstandingbarriersfacedbylmicwashresearchers
AT leilanzekele principlesforincreasingequityinwashresearchunderstandingbarriersfacedbylmicwashresearchers
AT jamesbtidwell principlesforincreasingequityinwashresearchunderstandingbarriersfacedbylmicwashresearchers