Survey on the current practice of research ethics committees in the Czech academic environment: a mixed-methods study

Abstract Background The primary objective of this study was to conduct a comprehensive questionnaire survey on the practices of research ethics committees reviewing academic research projects in Czechia. The study aims to provide an unbiased and objective assessment of the current practices of resea...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Renata Veselska, Jan Sirucek, Josef Kure
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2024-12-01
Series:BMC Medical Ethics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-024-01157-2
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850085956889083904
author Renata Veselska
Jan Sirucek
Josef Kure
author_facet Renata Veselska
Jan Sirucek
Josef Kure
author_sort Renata Veselska
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background The primary objective of this study was to conduct a comprehensive questionnaire survey on the practices of research ethics committees reviewing academic research projects in Czechia. The study aims to provide an unbiased and objective assessment of the current practices of research ethics committees, namely to obtain the missing data on their functioning in the context of academic research, to identify difficulties and shortages that threaten the responsible functioning of research ethics committees in the country and to investigate the implementation of Additional Protocol on Biomedical Research CETS No. 195 in their practice. Such research has never been conducted in Czechia. Methods This was a mixed-methods study, in which the online survey with closed and open-ended questions was chosen to explore the situation regarding ethics assessment of research involving human participants. We developed a questionnaire containing 18 questions concerning several aspects of the functioning of research ethics committees. The questionnaire was in Czech language and was administered through the Qualtrics platform anonymously. The target group of 61 research ethics committees at research institutions was approached by emails and we received 43 completely filled questionnaires, i.e., response rate of 67%. Results We obtained valuable data on the functioning of research ethics committees in Czechia in three main domains: the mandate and composition of the committee; the scope of its agenda; the process of evaluation including the voting procedure. In addition, the final set of open-ended questions provided an in-depth look at the problems faced by research ethics committees in Czechia. From the results is evident that the responsible assessment of the ethics of research involving human subjects is still not satisfactorily addressed and established for routine practice in the country. Conclusions The outcomes of our study revealed that the main problem of research ethics in Czechia is the lack of national legislation on research ethics governance. To address this problem, the country requires a legislative framework accompanied by supportive measures aimed at educating, guiding and advising research ethics committees, especially in the Czech academic environment. Trial registration number Not applicable.
format Article
id doaj-art-d45a9beab6a94056994cb7ef913af017
institution DOAJ
issn 1472-6939
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Medical Ethics
spelling doaj-art-d45a9beab6a94056994cb7ef913af0172025-08-20T02:43:36ZengBMCBMC Medical Ethics1472-69392024-12-0125111310.1186/s12910-024-01157-2Survey on the current practice of research ethics committees in the Czech academic environment: a mixed-methods studyRenata Veselska0Jan Sirucek1Josef Kure2Department of Experimental Biology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk UniversityDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Masaryk UniversityBioethics ConsultingAbstract Background The primary objective of this study was to conduct a comprehensive questionnaire survey on the practices of research ethics committees reviewing academic research projects in Czechia. The study aims to provide an unbiased and objective assessment of the current practices of research ethics committees, namely to obtain the missing data on their functioning in the context of academic research, to identify difficulties and shortages that threaten the responsible functioning of research ethics committees in the country and to investigate the implementation of Additional Protocol on Biomedical Research CETS No. 195 in their practice. Such research has never been conducted in Czechia. Methods This was a mixed-methods study, in which the online survey with closed and open-ended questions was chosen to explore the situation regarding ethics assessment of research involving human participants. We developed a questionnaire containing 18 questions concerning several aspects of the functioning of research ethics committees. The questionnaire was in Czech language and was administered through the Qualtrics platform anonymously. The target group of 61 research ethics committees at research institutions was approached by emails and we received 43 completely filled questionnaires, i.e., response rate of 67%. Results We obtained valuable data on the functioning of research ethics committees in Czechia in three main domains: the mandate and composition of the committee; the scope of its agenda; the process of evaluation including the voting procedure. In addition, the final set of open-ended questions provided an in-depth look at the problems faced by research ethics committees in Czechia. From the results is evident that the responsible assessment of the ethics of research involving human subjects is still not satisfactorily addressed and established for routine practice in the country. Conclusions The outcomes of our study revealed that the main problem of research ethics in Czechia is the lack of national legislation on research ethics governance. To address this problem, the country requires a legislative framework accompanied by supportive measures aimed at educating, guiding and advising research ethics committees, especially in the Czech academic environment. Trial registration number Not applicable.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-024-01157-2research ethicshuman subject researchresearch ethics committeesinternational ethics standardsresearch ethics governanceacademic research institutions
spellingShingle Renata Veselska
Jan Sirucek
Josef Kure
Survey on the current practice of research ethics committees in the Czech academic environment: a mixed-methods study
BMC Medical Ethics
research ethics
human subject research
research ethics committees
international ethics standards
research ethics governance
academic research institutions
title Survey on the current practice of research ethics committees in the Czech academic environment: a mixed-methods study
title_full Survey on the current practice of research ethics committees in the Czech academic environment: a mixed-methods study
title_fullStr Survey on the current practice of research ethics committees in the Czech academic environment: a mixed-methods study
title_full_unstemmed Survey on the current practice of research ethics committees in the Czech academic environment: a mixed-methods study
title_short Survey on the current practice of research ethics committees in the Czech academic environment: a mixed-methods study
title_sort survey on the current practice of research ethics committees in the czech academic environment a mixed methods study
topic research ethics
human subject research
research ethics committees
international ethics standards
research ethics governance
academic research institutions
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-024-01157-2
work_keys_str_mv AT renataveselska surveyonthecurrentpracticeofresearchethicscommitteesintheczechacademicenvironmentamixedmethodsstudy
AT jansirucek surveyonthecurrentpracticeofresearchethicscommitteesintheczechacademicenvironmentamixedmethodsstudy
AT josefkure surveyonthecurrentpracticeofresearchethicscommitteesintheczechacademicenvironmentamixedmethodsstudy