Immunity Against <i>Mycobacterium avium</i> Induced by DAR-901 and BCG

<b>Background:</b> The prevalence of pulmonary nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) is increasing in Europe and North America. Most pulmonary NTM cases are caused by <i>Mycobacterium avium</i> complex (MAC). The treatment of pulmonary MAC is suboptimal with failure rates ranging...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Getahun Abate, Krystal A. Meza, Chase G. Colbert, Octavio Ramos-Espinosa, Nancy J. Phillips, Christopher S. Eickhoff
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-06-01
Series:Vaccines
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/13/6/619
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849433861614731264
author Getahun Abate
Krystal A. Meza
Chase G. Colbert
Octavio Ramos-Espinosa
Nancy J. Phillips
Christopher S. Eickhoff
author_facet Getahun Abate
Krystal A. Meza
Chase G. Colbert
Octavio Ramos-Espinosa
Nancy J. Phillips
Christopher S. Eickhoff
author_sort Getahun Abate
collection DOAJ
description <b>Background:</b> The prevalence of pulmonary nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) is increasing in Europe and North America. Most pulmonary NTM cases are caused by <i>Mycobacterium avium</i> complex (MAC). The treatment of pulmonary MAC is suboptimal with failure rates ranging from 30% to 40% and there is a need to develop new vaccines. <b>Methods</b>: We tested the ability of two whole-cell vaccines, DAR-901 (heat-killed <i>M. obuense</i>) and BCG (live-attenuated <i>M. bovis</i>), to induce MAC cross-reactive immunity by first immunizing BALB/c mice and then performing IFN-γ ELISPOT assays after overnight stimulation of splenocytes with live MAC. To study the ability of these vaccines to protect against MAC infection, BALB/c mice were vaccinated with DAR-901 (intradermal) or BCG (subcutaneous or intranasal) and challenged with aerosolized MAC 4 weeks later. A group of mice vaccinated with BCG were also treated with clarithromycin via gavage. Lung colony-forming units (CFU) in immunized mice and unvaccinated controls were quantified 4 weeks after infection. Histopathology was used to quantify lung inflammation and flow cytometry was used to study lung immunity in BCG-vaccinated and unvaccinated mice following MAC infection. To increase the safety profile of mucosal BCG vaccination, we studied BCG with a “kill switch” (tetR BCG) in <i>scnn1b</i>-transgenic mice (i.e., mice prone to cystic fibrosis-type lung diseases). <b>Results</b>: Our results showed that (i) DAR-901 induced cross-reactive immunity to MAC to a similar level as BCG, (ii) DAR-901 and BCG protected against aerosol MAC challenge, (iii) mucosal BCG vaccination, compared to systemic BCG and DAR-901 vaccinations, provided the best protection against MAC challenge, (iv) BCG vaccination did not interfere with anti-MAC activities of clarithromycin, (v) BCG-vaccinated mice had increased inflammation and increased frequencies of activated CD4 and CD8 T cells following MAC infection, and (vi) doxycycline treatment of tetR BCG-vaccinated mice decreased lung BCG CFU without affecting MAC immunity. <b>Conclusions</b>: Both DAR-901 and BCG vaccinations induce MAC cross-reactive immunity and protect against aerosolized MAC challenges. Mucosal BCG vaccination provides the best protection and TetR BCG could enhance the safety of mucosal BCG vaccination.
format Article
id doaj-art-d457a44b0e49443fa04997c1ef7e5451
institution Kabale University
issn 2076-393X
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Vaccines
spelling doaj-art-d457a44b0e49443fa04997c1ef7e54512025-08-20T03:26:52ZengMDPI AGVaccines2076-393X2025-06-0113661910.3390/vaccines13060619Immunity Against <i>Mycobacterium avium</i> Induced by DAR-901 and BCGGetahun Abate0Krystal A. Meza1Chase G. Colbert2Octavio Ramos-Espinosa3Nancy J. Phillips4Christopher S. Eickhoff5Division of Infectious Diseases, Allergy and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO 63104, USADivision of Infectious Diseases, Allergy and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO 63104, USADivision of Infectious Diseases, Allergy and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO 63104, USADivision of Infectious Diseases, Allergy and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO 63104, USADepartment of Pathology, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO 63104, USADivision of Infectious Diseases, Allergy and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO 63104, USA<b>Background:</b> The prevalence of pulmonary nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) is increasing in Europe and North America. Most pulmonary NTM cases are caused by <i>Mycobacterium avium</i> complex (MAC). The treatment of pulmonary MAC is suboptimal with failure rates ranging from 30% to 40% and there is a need to develop new vaccines. <b>Methods</b>: We tested the ability of two whole-cell vaccines, DAR-901 (heat-killed <i>M. obuense</i>) and BCG (live-attenuated <i>M. bovis</i>), to induce MAC cross-reactive immunity by first immunizing BALB/c mice and then performing IFN-γ ELISPOT assays after overnight stimulation of splenocytes with live MAC. To study the ability of these vaccines to protect against MAC infection, BALB/c mice were vaccinated with DAR-901 (intradermal) or BCG (subcutaneous or intranasal) and challenged with aerosolized MAC 4 weeks later. A group of mice vaccinated with BCG were also treated with clarithromycin via gavage. Lung colony-forming units (CFU) in immunized mice and unvaccinated controls were quantified 4 weeks after infection. Histopathology was used to quantify lung inflammation and flow cytometry was used to study lung immunity in BCG-vaccinated and unvaccinated mice following MAC infection. To increase the safety profile of mucosal BCG vaccination, we studied BCG with a “kill switch” (tetR BCG) in <i>scnn1b</i>-transgenic mice (i.e., mice prone to cystic fibrosis-type lung diseases). <b>Results</b>: Our results showed that (i) DAR-901 induced cross-reactive immunity to MAC to a similar level as BCG, (ii) DAR-901 and BCG protected against aerosol MAC challenge, (iii) mucosal BCG vaccination, compared to systemic BCG and DAR-901 vaccinations, provided the best protection against MAC challenge, (iv) BCG vaccination did not interfere with anti-MAC activities of clarithromycin, (v) BCG-vaccinated mice had increased inflammation and increased frequencies of activated CD4 and CD8 T cells following MAC infection, and (vi) doxycycline treatment of tetR BCG-vaccinated mice decreased lung BCG CFU without affecting MAC immunity. <b>Conclusions</b>: Both DAR-901 and BCG vaccinations induce MAC cross-reactive immunity and protect against aerosolized MAC challenges. Mucosal BCG vaccination provides the best protection and TetR BCG could enhance the safety of mucosal BCG vaccination.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/13/6/619<i>M. avium</i>BCGDAR-901immunityBALB/c
spellingShingle Getahun Abate
Krystal A. Meza
Chase G. Colbert
Octavio Ramos-Espinosa
Nancy J. Phillips
Christopher S. Eickhoff
Immunity Against <i>Mycobacterium avium</i> Induced by DAR-901 and BCG
Vaccines
<i>M. avium</i>
BCG
DAR-901
immunity
BALB/c
title Immunity Against <i>Mycobacterium avium</i> Induced by DAR-901 and BCG
title_full Immunity Against <i>Mycobacterium avium</i> Induced by DAR-901 and BCG
title_fullStr Immunity Against <i>Mycobacterium avium</i> Induced by DAR-901 and BCG
title_full_unstemmed Immunity Against <i>Mycobacterium avium</i> Induced by DAR-901 and BCG
title_short Immunity Against <i>Mycobacterium avium</i> Induced by DAR-901 and BCG
title_sort immunity against i mycobacterium avium i induced by dar 901 and bcg
topic <i>M. avium</i>
BCG
DAR-901
immunity
BALB/c
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/13/6/619
work_keys_str_mv AT getahunabate immunityagainstimycobacteriumaviumiinducedbydar901andbcg
AT krystalameza immunityagainstimycobacteriumaviumiinducedbydar901andbcg
AT chasegcolbert immunityagainstimycobacteriumaviumiinducedbydar901andbcg
AT octavioramosespinosa immunityagainstimycobacteriumaviumiinducedbydar901andbcg
AT nancyjphillips immunityagainstimycobacteriumaviumiinducedbydar901andbcg
AT christopherseickhoff immunityagainstimycobacteriumaviumiinducedbydar901andbcg