Evaluation of enamel surface roughness using different types of polishing system after orthodontic bracket debonding
Background: returning surface of the enamel to its pre-orthodontic state after debonding of brackets without any damage to the texture of enamel is a clinical contest. removal of Residual adhesive using correct and suitable tools and methods ensures a smooth surface and healthy plaque-free environ...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
College Of Dentistry Hawler Medical University
2021-07-01
|
| Series: | Erbil Dental Journal |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://edj.hmu.edu.krd/index.php/journal/article/view/107 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1823859792483975168 |
|---|---|
| author | Maryam Fouad Bilal Lanja Abubakir Ali Deman Hasan Hamid Rebin Ali Mohammed Amin |
| author_facet | Maryam Fouad Bilal Lanja Abubakir Ali Deman Hasan Hamid Rebin Ali Mohammed Amin |
| author_sort | Maryam Fouad Bilal |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
Background: returning surface of the enamel to its pre-orthodontic state after debonding of brackets without any damage to the texture of enamel is a clinical contest. removal of Residual adhesive using correct and suitable tools and methods ensures a smooth surface and healthy
plaque-free environment. Therefore; the study aims to determine the safest method to finish enamel surface after bracket debonding using three different methods.
Method: Thirty premolars extracted for orthodontic purposes were selected for this study. The samples were coded 1-30 randomly and surface roughness was measured before bracket placement using profilometer. Then bracket bonded in the middle third of the buccal surface of
the premolars and then debonded using debonding plier. The sample was divided into three groups, 10 for each group (group 1: 18-flute tungsten carbide bur, group 2: 12- flute tungsten carbide bur, group 3: adhesive removing plier). Then the second roughness measurement was
recorded.
Result: It is found that debonding with adhesive removing plier was the least efficient method followed by 12-fluted tungsten carbide bur, so the best clean-up method in this study achieved is by using 18-fluted tungsten carbide bur.
Conclusion: The 18-fluted flame-shaped tungsten carbide bur at high speed for orthodontic adhesive removal demonstrated more favorable results in our hands, as it resulted in the smoothest enamel surface and could reasonably be used as a standard by which future other
burs or other procedures are compared.
|
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-d4501bf1f1a74a4eb79e19640ed10c2f |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2523-6172 2616-4795 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2021-07-01 |
| publisher | College Of Dentistry Hawler Medical University |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Erbil Dental Journal |
| spelling | doaj-art-d4501bf1f1a74a4eb79e19640ed10c2f2025-02-10T20:48:39ZengCollege Of Dentistry Hawler Medical UniversityErbil Dental Journal2523-61722616-47952021-07-0141Evaluation of enamel surface roughness using different types of polishing system after orthodontic bracket debondingMaryam Fouad Bilal0Lanja Abubakir Ali1Deman Hasan Hamid2Rebin Ali Mohammed Amin3Department of Pedodontics, Orthodontics and Preventive Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Hawler Medical University, Erbil, Iraq.Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry - Hawler Medical University, Erbil, Iraq.Department of Pedodontics, Orthodontics and Preventive Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Hawler Medical University, Erbil, Iraq.Department of Pedodontics, Orthodontics and Preventive Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Hawler Medical University, Erbil, Iraq. Background: returning surface of the enamel to its pre-orthodontic state after debonding of brackets without any damage to the texture of enamel is a clinical contest. removal of Residual adhesive using correct and suitable tools and methods ensures a smooth surface and healthy plaque-free environment. Therefore; the study aims to determine the safest method to finish enamel surface after bracket debonding using three different methods. Method: Thirty premolars extracted for orthodontic purposes were selected for this study. The samples were coded 1-30 randomly and surface roughness was measured before bracket placement using profilometer. Then bracket bonded in the middle third of the buccal surface of the premolars and then debonded using debonding plier. The sample was divided into three groups, 10 for each group (group 1: 18-flute tungsten carbide bur, group 2: 12- flute tungsten carbide bur, group 3: adhesive removing plier). Then the second roughness measurement was recorded. Result: It is found that debonding with adhesive removing plier was the least efficient method followed by 12-fluted tungsten carbide bur, so the best clean-up method in this study achieved is by using 18-fluted tungsten carbide bur. Conclusion: The 18-fluted flame-shaped tungsten carbide bur at high speed for orthodontic adhesive removal demonstrated more favorable results in our hands, as it resulted in the smoothest enamel surface and could reasonably be used as a standard by which future other burs or other procedures are compared. https://edj.hmu.edu.krd/index.php/journal/article/view/10712-fluted tungsten carbide bur18-fluted tungsten carbide burAdhesive removing plierProfilometerEnamel surface roughness |
| spellingShingle | Maryam Fouad Bilal Lanja Abubakir Ali Deman Hasan Hamid Rebin Ali Mohammed Amin Evaluation of enamel surface roughness using different types of polishing system after orthodontic bracket debonding Erbil Dental Journal 12-fluted tungsten carbide bur 18-fluted tungsten carbide bur Adhesive removing plier Profilometer Enamel surface roughness |
| title | Evaluation of enamel surface roughness using different types of polishing system after orthodontic bracket debonding |
| title_full | Evaluation of enamel surface roughness using different types of polishing system after orthodontic bracket debonding |
| title_fullStr | Evaluation of enamel surface roughness using different types of polishing system after orthodontic bracket debonding |
| title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of enamel surface roughness using different types of polishing system after orthodontic bracket debonding |
| title_short | Evaluation of enamel surface roughness using different types of polishing system after orthodontic bracket debonding |
| title_sort | evaluation of enamel surface roughness using different types of polishing system after orthodontic bracket debonding |
| topic | 12-fluted tungsten carbide bur 18-fluted tungsten carbide bur Adhesive removing plier Profilometer Enamel surface roughness |
| url | https://edj.hmu.edu.krd/index.php/journal/article/view/107 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT maryamfouadbilal evaluationofenamelsurfaceroughnessusingdifferenttypesofpolishingsystemafterorthodonticbracketdebonding AT lanjaabubakirali evaluationofenamelsurfaceroughnessusingdifferenttypesofpolishingsystemafterorthodonticbracketdebonding AT demanhasanhamid evaluationofenamelsurfaceroughnessusingdifferenttypesofpolishingsystemafterorthodonticbracketdebonding AT rebinalimohammedamin evaluationofenamelsurfaceroughnessusingdifferenttypesofpolishingsystemafterorthodonticbracketdebonding |