Paying reviewers and regulating the number of papers may help fix the peer-review process [version 4; peer review: 4 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
The exponential increase in the number of submissions, further accelerated by generative AI, and the decline in the availability of experts are burdening the peer review process. This has led to high unethical desk rejection rates, a growing appeal for the publication of unreviewed preprints, and a...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | Mohamed L. Seghier |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
F1000 Research Ltd
2025-06-01
|
| Series: | F1000Research |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://f1000research.com/articles/13-439/v4 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Publisher preferences for a journal transparency tool: A modified three-round Delphi study [version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
by: David Moher, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
“I just very much love the journal”: Understanding the community-led publishing landscape at the University of Cambridge [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
by: Mandy Wigdorowitz, et al.
Published: (2025-07-01) -
“I just very much love the journal”: Understanding the community-led publishing landscape at the University of Cambridge [version 1; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
by: Mandy Wigdorowitz, et al.
Published: (2025-03-01) -
Prospects of digital scientific publishing on blockchain: The concept of DAP [version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]
by: Zorislav Šojat, et al.
Published: (2024-11-01) -
Dynamic participation in local energy communities with peer-to-peer trading [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
by: Theresia Perger, et al.
Published: (2024-10-01)