Global trends and practice patterns in virtual reality simulation training for ophthalmic surgery: an international survey use of virtual reality simulation training around the world

Global trends and practice patterns in virtual reality simulation training for ophthalmic surgery: an international survey use of virtual reality simulation training around the world

Abstract This global survey investigated the use of virtual reality simulation (VRS) in ophthalmological surgery education. Questionnaires were distributed to authors of publications and directors of centers using VRS for surgical education in ophthalmology, then forwarded to residents and fellows o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lea Dormegny, Remi Yaïci, Emilia Koestel, Sorcha Ní Dhubhghaill, Chetan Ahiwalay, Ashish Bacchav, Jean-Louis Bourges, Gauthier Dechriste, H. Burkhard Dick, Helena Prior Filipe, Elias Flockerzi, David Gaucher, Van Charles Lansingh, Pamela Gonzalez, Bonnie An Henderson, Salome Kuntz, Rindra Rafanomezantsoa, Jean-Marie Andre, Guillermo Rocha, Antoine Rousseau, Arnaud Sauer, Marion Schaeffer, Berthold Seitz, Lauriana Solecki, Ann Sofia Skou Thomsen, Nabil Chakfe, Anne Lejay, Tristan Bourcier
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2025-08-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Subjects:
Surgical education
Ophthalmology residents
Ophthalmology curriculum
Virtual reality simulator
Competency-based medical education
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-16227-7
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract This global survey investigated the use of virtual reality simulation (VRS) in ophthalmological surgery education. Questionnaires were distributed to authors of publications and directors of centers using VRS for surgical education in ophthalmology, then forwarded to residents and fellows of their team for completion. Out of 1845 questionnaires sent across 36 countries, 170 responses from 26 countries were analyzed, primarily from residents and fellows (75%). Mean access duration to VRS was 3.6 years, often at University Hospitals (43.5%). Notably, 12% of respondents traveled an average of 550 km to access VRS. The EyeSi VR Magic was the most frequently reported simulator (80%, mainly in Europe/North America), followed by HelpMeSee (48%, primarily in Europe/India/Madagascar). In 25 training centers across 12 countries, VRS was a mandatory prerequisite for patient access, functioning as a “surgical license”. A larger number of training centers (49 from 19 countries) favored such mandatory training. Junior surgeons perceived a greater impact of VRS on their surgical practice compared to senior surgeons (p = 0.032). The study concludes that while VRS holds a significant role in postgraduate ophthalmic surgical training, its access is unequal worldwide. Broader implementation and standardized practices could improve and maintain high educational standards in this field.
ISSN:2045-2322

Similar Items