Scholarly publishing's hidden diversity: How exclusive databases sustain the oligopoly of academic publishers.
Global scholarly publishing has been dominated by a small number of publishers for several decades. This paper revisits the data on corporate control of scholarly publishing by analyzing the relative shares of scholarly journals and articles published by the major publishers and the "long tail&...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Simon van Bellen, Juan Pablo Alperin, Vincent Larivière |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0327015 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Scholarly publishing’s hidden diversity: How exclusive databases sustain the oligopoly of academic publishers
by: Simon van Bellen, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
The oligopoly’s shift to open access: How the big five academic publishers profit from article processing charges
by: Leigh-Ann Butler, et al.
Published: (2024-02-01) -
SPARC: The Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition
by: Alison Buckholtz
Published: (1999-06-01) -
Recalibrating the scope of scholarly publishing: A modest step in a vast decolonization process
by: Saurabh Khanna, et al.
Published: (2023-02-01) -
Publish Or Perish: Scholarly Publishing Challenges In Africa
by: Leila Bellour
Published: (2024-11-01)