IS SUSTAINABLE COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE ANTEDILUVIAN?
This article aims to understand the contemporary relevance of the sustainable competitive advantage (SCA) concept in strategic management. Mainstream management and business training perpetuates the use of SCA despite indications that it is elusive. This study intends to elucidate how, in the 4th In...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Academy of Economic Studies of Moldova (AESM), Center for Studies in European Integration
2024-06-01
|
| Series: | Eastern European Journal of Regional Studies |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://csei.ase.md/journal/files/issue_101/EEJRS_Issue10.1_page-53-78.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849700759927521280 |
|---|---|
| author | Vera KRIEL Geoff A GOLDMAN |
| author_facet | Vera KRIEL Geoff A GOLDMAN |
| author_sort | Vera KRIEL |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This article aims to understand the contemporary relevance of the sustainable competitive advantage (SCA) concept in strategic management. Mainstream management and business training perpetuates the use of SCA despite indications that it is elusive. This study intends to elucidate how, in the 4th Industrial Revolution (4IR) world, SCA has become irrelevant, what the possible reasons are for its continued use and what alternatives can be explored for business success. The study followed an exploratory, constructivist grounded theory approach. Data were obtained from 27 semi-structured interviews to develop a grounded theory. Findings revealed four main themes, and pronounce that in a complex, interconnected business world, SCA is mostly obsolete, which demands an organisation to adapt its strategy, business model and culture to create value, be relevant, have a significant (positive) impact and contribute to the common good. The main implication of the study is therefore that SCA should no longer be promoted as a key concept for organisational success by management and academia. Alternatives to SCA, such as agility and complexity management, are more relevant in an interconnected 4IR business environment. The study enhances the body of knowledge by bolstering the critique on the continued use of SCA in contemporary business management. It furthermore highlights potential erroneous assumptions through a direct explanation of why SCA assumptions are antiquated. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-d3bcd635f52346868e4d503310eaf24d |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 1857-436X 2537-6179 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-06-01 |
| publisher | Academy of Economic Studies of Moldova (AESM), Center for Studies in European Integration |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Eastern European Journal of Regional Studies |
| spelling | doaj-art-d3bcd635f52346868e4d503310eaf24d2025-08-20T03:18:09ZengAcademy of Economic Studies of Moldova (AESM), Center for Studies in European IntegrationEastern European Journal of Regional Studies1857-436X2537-61792024-06-011015378https://doi.org/10.53486/2537-6179.10-1.04IS SUSTAINABLE COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE ANTEDILUVIAN?Vera KRIEL0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0490-6278Geoff A GOLDMAN1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3069-3106University of Johannesburg, South AfricaUniversity of Johannesburg, South AfricaThis article aims to understand the contemporary relevance of the sustainable competitive advantage (SCA) concept in strategic management. Mainstream management and business training perpetuates the use of SCA despite indications that it is elusive. This study intends to elucidate how, in the 4th Industrial Revolution (4IR) world, SCA has become irrelevant, what the possible reasons are for its continued use and what alternatives can be explored for business success. The study followed an exploratory, constructivist grounded theory approach. Data were obtained from 27 semi-structured interviews to develop a grounded theory. Findings revealed four main themes, and pronounce that in a complex, interconnected business world, SCA is mostly obsolete, which demands an organisation to adapt its strategy, business model and culture to create value, be relevant, have a significant (positive) impact and contribute to the common good. The main implication of the study is therefore that SCA should no longer be promoted as a key concept for organisational success by management and academia. Alternatives to SCA, such as agility and complexity management, are more relevant in an interconnected 4IR business environment. The study enhances the body of knowledge by bolstering the critique on the continued use of SCA in contemporary business management. It furthermore highlights potential erroneous assumptions through a direct explanation of why SCA assumptions are antiquated.https://csei.ase.md/journal/files/issue_101/EEJRS_Issue10.1_page-53-78.pdfstrategysustainable competitive advantageorganisational changedisruptive change4ir |
| spellingShingle | Vera KRIEL Geoff A GOLDMAN IS SUSTAINABLE COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE ANTEDILUVIAN? Eastern European Journal of Regional Studies strategy sustainable competitive advantage organisational change disruptive change 4ir |
| title | IS SUSTAINABLE COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE ANTEDILUVIAN? |
| title_full | IS SUSTAINABLE COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE ANTEDILUVIAN? |
| title_fullStr | IS SUSTAINABLE COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE ANTEDILUVIAN? |
| title_full_unstemmed | IS SUSTAINABLE COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE ANTEDILUVIAN? |
| title_short | IS SUSTAINABLE COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE ANTEDILUVIAN? |
| title_sort | is sustainable competitive advantage antediluvian |
| topic | strategy sustainable competitive advantage organisational change disruptive change 4ir |
| url | https://csei.ase.md/journal/files/issue_101/EEJRS_Issue10.1_page-53-78.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT verakriel issustainablecompetitiveadvantageantediluvian AT geoffagoldman issustainablecompetitiveadvantageantediluvian |