Perioperative Arthroscopic Tourniquet Usage: Practices and Trends of the AANA Membership Are Varied

Purpose: To investigate current practices for tourniquet use, including tourniquet times, indications, and other perioperative applications, among Arthroscopy Association of North America (AANA) members and to determine whether recommendations can be made for safer tourniquet use. Methods: Participa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Brian Day, M.B., M.Sc., F.R.C.P.(Lon), F.R.C.S.(Eng and C)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-06-01
Series:Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitation
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666061X2500032X
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849423554455535616
author Brian Day, M.B., M.Sc., F.R.C.P.(Lon), F.R.C.S.(Eng and C)
author_facet Brian Day, M.B., M.Sc., F.R.C.P.(Lon), F.R.C.S.(Eng and C)
author_sort Brian Day, M.B., M.Sc., F.R.C.P.(Lon), F.R.C.S.(Eng and C)
collection DOAJ
description Purpose: To investigate current practices for tourniquet use, including tourniquet times, indications, and other perioperative applications, among Arthroscopy Association of North America (AANA) members and to determine whether recommendations can be made for safer tourniquet use. Methods: Participants in this study were AANA members who responded to our survey in the AANA DocMatter Community. The survey was developed based on discussion prompts in DocMatter. The survey consisted of 28 questions on 4 core themes, including demographic characteristics, general understanding of tourniquet safety, applied tourniquet use in arthroscopy, and tourniquet technology in perioperative applications. The survey was open for responses for 7 weeks from September to November 2023. Multiple-choice responses were counted, and short-form responses were reviewed and aggregated based on keywords. Qualitative analysis was used to understand the data. Results: A total of 59 AANA DocMatter Community Members participated in the survey. Eighty percent of respondents had been in practice for more than 10 years, whereas 20% had been in practice for between 3 and 10 years. Tourniquet usage in arthroscopy was varied, although some patterns were detected. For example, 91% of responders applied tourniquets for all limb procedures, but many inflated them only as needed, and some preferred not to use a tourniquet. When tourniquet times were minimized by selectively inflating cuffs, tourniquet times averaged between 15 and 20 minutes compared with 20 to 60 minutes for continuous inflation. However, 76% of participants reported encountering venous congestion when a tourniquet was applied but not inflated. Perioperative tourniquet uses were also varied. Almost half of respondents used tourniquets for blood flow restriction therapy in their care protocols. In a separate possible trend, a majority of respondents were interested in using tourniquet-related technology to help resolve postsurgical lymphedema. Conclusions: Despite large reported variation in the indications for tourniquet use and the control of key tourniquet parameters, use is evolving through a focus on optimizing tourniquet times through selective inflation for specific aspects of arthroscopic procedures. Clinical Relevance: Standardized approaches to the safe use of tourniquets and their evolving applications are important areas of investigation.
format Article
id doaj-art-d3800e0084ba4fa2beb4ffe9093100c3
institution Kabale University
issn 2666-061X
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitation
spelling doaj-art-d3800e0084ba4fa2beb4ffe9093100c32025-08-20T03:30:32ZengElsevierArthroscopy, Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitation2666-061X2025-06-017310110610.1016/j.asmr.2025.101106Perioperative Arthroscopic Tourniquet Usage: Practices and Trends of the AANA Membership Are VariedBrian Day, M.B., M.Sc., F.R.C.P.(Lon), F.R.C.S.(Eng and C)0Address correspondence to Brian Day, M.B., M.Sc., F.R.C.P.(Lon), F.R.C.S.(Eng and C), Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, 2836 Ash, Vancouver, BC Canada V5Z3C6.; Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, CanadaPurpose: To investigate current practices for tourniquet use, including tourniquet times, indications, and other perioperative applications, among Arthroscopy Association of North America (AANA) members and to determine whether recommendations can be made for safer tourniquet use. Methods: Participants in this study were AANA members who responded to our survey in the AANA DocMatter Community. The survey was developed based on discussion prompts in DocMatter. The survey consisted of 28 questions on 4 core themes, including demographic characteristics, general understanding of tourniquet safety, applied tourniquet use in arthroscopy, and tourniquet technology in perioperative applications. The survey was open for responses for 7 weeks from September to November 2023. Multiple-choice responses were counted, and short-form responses were reviewed and aggregated based on keywords. Qualitative analysis was used to understand the data. Results: A total of 59 AANA DocMatter Community Members participated in the survey. Eighty percent of respondents had been in practice for more than 10 years, whereas 20% had been in practice for between 3 and 10 years. Tourniquet usage in arthroscopy was varied, although some patterns were detected. For example, 91% of responders applied tourniquets for all limb procedures, but many inflated them only as needed, and some preferred not to use a tourniquet. When tourniquet times were minimized by selectively inflating cuffs, tourniquet times averaged between 15 and 20 minutes compared with 20 to 60 minutes for continuous inflation. However, 76% of participants reported encountering venous congestion when a tourniquet was applied but not inflated. Perioperative tourniquet uses were also varied. Almost half of respondents used tourniquets for blood flow restriction therapy in their care protocols. In a separate possible trend, a majority of respondents were interested in using tourniquet-related technology to help resolve postsurgical lymphedema. Conclusions: Despite large reported variation in the indications for tourniquet use and the control of key tourniquet parameters, use is evolving through a focus on optimizing tourniquet times through selective inflation for specific aspects of arthroscopic procedures. Clinical Relevance: Standardized approaches to the safe use of tourniquets and their evolving applications are important areas of investigation.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666061X2500032X
spellingShingle Brian Day, M.B., M.Sc., F.R.C.P.(Lon), F.R.C.S.(Eng and C)
Perioperative Arthroscopic Tourniquet Usage: Practices and Trends of the AANA Membership Are Varied
Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitation
title Perioperative Arthroscopic Tourniquet Usage: Practices and Trends of the AANA Membership Are Varied
title_full Perioperative Arthroscopic Tourniquet Usage: Practices and Trends of the AANA Membership Are Varied
title_fullStr Perioperative Arthroscopic Tourniquet Usage: Practices and Trends of the AANA Membership Are Varied
title_full_unstemmed Perioperative Arthroscopic Tourniquet Usage: Practices and Trends of the AANA Membership Are Varied
title_short Perioperative Arthroscopic Tourniquet Usage: Practices and Trends of the AANA Membership Are Varied
title_sort perioperative arthroscopic tourniquet usage practices and trends of the aana membership are varied
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666061X2500032X
work_keys_str_mv AT briandaymbmscfrcplonfrcsengandc perioperativearthroscopictourniquetusagepracticesandtrendsoftheaanamembershiparevaried