Validity of electronically administered Recent Physical Activity Questionnaire (RPAQ) in ten European countries.

<h4>Objective</h4>To examine the validity of the Recent Physical Activity Questionnaire (RPAQ) which assesses physical activity (PA) in 4 domains (leisure, work, commuting, home) during past month.<h4>Methods</h4>580 men and 1343 women from 10 European countries attended 2 vi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rajna Golubic, Anne M May, Kristin Benjaminsen Borch, Kim Overvad, Marie-Aline Charles, Maria Jose Tormo Diaz, Pilar Amiano, Domenico Palli, Elisavet Valanou, Matthaeus Vigl, Paul W Franks, Nicholas Wareham, Ulf Ekelund, Soren Brage
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0092829&type=printable
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849332417428455424
author Rajna Golubic
Anne M May
Kristin Benjaminsen Borch
Kim Overvad
Marie-Aline Charles
Maria Jose Tormo Diaz
Pilar Amiano
Domenico Palli
Elisavet Valanou
Matthaeus Vigl
Paul W Franks
Nicholas Wareham
Ulf Ekelund
Soren Brage
author_facet Rajna Golubic
Anne M May
Kristin Benjaminsen Borch
Kim Overvad
Marie-Aline Charles
Maria Jose Tormo Diaz
Pilar Amiano
Domenico Palli
Elisavet Valanou
Matthaeus Vigl
Paul W Franks
Nicholas Wareham
Ulf Ekelund
Soren Brage
author_sort Rajna Golubic
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Objective</h4>To examine the validity of the Recent Physical Activity Questionnaire (RPAQ) which assesses physical activity (PA) in 4 domains (leisure, work, commuting, home) during past month.<h4>Methods</h4>580 men and 1343 women from 10 European countries attended 2 visits at which PA energy expenditure (PAEE), time at moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) and sedentary time were measured using individually-calibrated combined heart-rate and movement sensing. At the second visit, RPAQ was administered electronically. Validity was assessed using agreement analysis.<h4>Results</h4>RPAQ significantly underestimated PAEE in women [median(IQR): 34.9 (22.3, 52.8) vs. 40.6 (32.4, 50.9) kJ/kg/day, 95%LoA: -44.4, 66.1 kJ/kg/day) and overestimated PAEE in men [45.9 (30.6, 71.1) vs. 45.5 (34.1, 57.6) kJ/kg/day, 95%LoA: -44.8, 102.6 kJ/kg/day]. Using individualised definition of 1MET, RPAQ significantly underestimated MVPA in women [median(IQR): 63.7 (30.5, 126.9) vs. 73.6 (47.8, 107.2) min/day, 95%LoA: -127.4, 311.9 min/day] and overestimated MVPA in men [90.0 (42.3, 188.6) vs. 83.3 (55.1, 125.0) min/day, 95%LoA: -134.8, 427.3 min/day]. Correlations (95%CI) between subjective and objective estimates were statistically significant [PAEE: women, rho = 0.20 (0.15-0.26); men, rho = 0.37 (0.30-0.44); MVPA: women, rho = 0.18 (0.13-0.24); men, rho = 0.31 (0.24-0.38)]. When using non-individualised definition of 1MET (3.5 mlO2/kg/min), MVPA was substantially overestimated (16 min/day, and 32 min/day in women and men, respectively). Revisiting occupational intensity assumptions in questionnaire estimation algorithms with occupational group-level empirical distributions reduced median PAEE-bias in manual (38.8 kJ/kg/day vs. 6.8 kJ/kg/day, p<0.001) and heavy manual workers (63.6 vs. -2.8 kJ/kg/day, p<0.001) in an independent hold-out sample [corrected].<h4>Conclusion</h4>Relative validity of RPAQ-derived PAEE and MVPA is comparable to previous studies but underestimation of PAEE is smaller. Electronic RPAQ may be used in large-scale epidemiological studies including surveys, providing information on all domains of PA.
format Article
id doaj-art-d370495ae0bd44d7a76ee9ca3d86f13c
institution Kabale University
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2014-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-d370495ae0bd44d7a76ee9ca3d86f13c2025-08-20T03:46:12ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0193e9282910.1371/journal.pone.0092829Validity of electronically administered Recent Physical Activity Questionnaire (RPAQ) in ten European countries.Rajna GolubicAnne M MayKristin Benjaminsen BorchKim OvervadMarie-Aline CharlesMaria Jose Tormo DiazPilar AmianoDomenico PalliElisavet ValanouMatthaeus ViglPaul W FranksNicholas WarehamUlf EkelundSoren Brage<h4>Objective</h4>To examine the validity of the Recent Physical Activity Questionnaire (RPAQ) which assesses physical activity (PA) in 4 domains (leisure, work, commuting, home) during past month.<h4>Methods</h4>580 men and 1343 women from 10 European countries attended 2 visits at which PA energy expenditure (PAEE), time at moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) and sedentary time were measured using individually-calibrated combined heart-rate and movement sensing. At the second visit, RPAQ was administered electronically. Validity was assessed using agreement analysis.<h4>Results</h4>RPAQ significantly underestimated PAEE in women [median(IQR): 34.9 (22.3, 52.8) vs. 40.6 (32.4, 50.9) kJ/kg/day, 95%LoA: -44.4, 66.1 kJ/kg/day) and overestimated PAEE in men [45.9 (30.6, 71.1) vs. 45.5 (34.1, 57.6) kJ/kg/day, 95%LoA: -44.8, 102.6 kJ/kg/day]. Using individualised definition of 1MET, RPAQ significantly underestimated MVPA in women [median(IQR): 63.7 (30.5, 126.9) vs. 73.6 (47.8, 107.2) min/day, 95%LoA: -127.4, 311.9 min/day] and overestimated MVPA in men [90.0 (42.3, 188.6) vs. 83.3 (55.1, 125.0) min/day, 95%LoA: -134.8, 427.3 min/day]. Correlations (95%CI) between subjective and objective estimates were statistically significant [PAEE: women, rho = 0.20 (0.15-0.26); men, rho = 0.37 (0.30-0.44); MVPA: women, rho = 0.18 (0.13-0.24); men, rho = 0.31 (0.24-0.38)]. When using non-individualised definition of 1MET (3.5 mlO2/kg/min), MVPA was substantially overestimated (16 min/day, and 32 min/day in women and men, respectively). Revisiting occupational intensity assumptions in questionnaire estimation algorithms with occupational group-level empirical distributions reduced median PAEE-bias in manual (38.8 kJ/kg/day vs. 6.8 kJ/kg/day, p<0.001) and heavy manual workers (63.6 vs. -2.8 kJ/kg/day, p<0.001) in an independent hold-out sample [corrected].<h4>Conclusion</h4>Relative validity of RPAQ-derived PAEE and MVPA is comparable to previous studies but underestimation of PAEE is smaller. Electronic RPAQ may be used in large-scale epidemiological studies including surveys, providing information on all domains of PA.https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0092829&type=printable
spellingShingle Rajna Golubic
Anne M May
Kristin Benjaminsen Borch
Kim Overvad
Marie-Aline Charles
Maria Jose Tormo Diaz
Pilar Amiano
Domenico Palli
Elisavet Valanou
Matthaeus Vigl
Paul W Franks
Nicholas Wareham
Ulf Ekelund
Soren Brage
Validity of electronically administered Recent Physical Activity Questionnaire (RPAQ) in ten European countries.
PLoS ONE
title Validity of electronically administered Recent Physical Activity Questionnaire (RPAQ) in ten European countries.
title_full Validity of electronically administered Recent Physical Activity Questionnaire (RPAQ) in ten European countries.
title_fullStr Validity of electronically administered Recent Physical Activity Questionnaire (RPAQ) in ten European countries.
title_full_unstemmed Validity of electronically administered Recent Physical Activity Questionnaire (RPAQ) in ten European countries.
title_short Validity of electronically administered Recent Physical Activity Questionnaire (RPAQ) in ten European countries.
title_sort validity of electronically administered recent physical activity questionnaire rpaq in ten european countries
url https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0092829&type=printable
work_keys_str_mv AT rajnagolubic validityofelectronicallyadministeredrecentphysicalactivityquestionnairerpaqinteneuropeancountries
AT annemmay validityofelectronicallyadministeredrecentphysicalactivityquestionnairerpaqinteneuropeancountries
AT kristinbenjaminsenborch validityofelectronicallyadministeredrecentphysicalactivityquestionnairerpaqinteneuropeancountries
AT kimovervad validityofelectronicallyadministeredrecentphysicalactivityquestionnairerpaqinteneuropeancountries
AT mariealinecharles validityofelectronicallyadministeredrecentphysicalactivityquestionnairerpaqinteneuropeancountries
AT mariajosetormodiaz validityofelectronicallyadministeredrecentphysicalactivityquestionnairerpaqinteneuropeancountries
AT pilaramiano validityofelectronicallyadministeredrecentphysicalactivityquestionnairerpaqinteneuropeancountries
AT domenicopalli validityofelectronicallyadministeredrecentphysicalactivityquestionnairerpaqinteneuropeancountries
AT elisavetvalanou validityofelectronicallyadministeredrecentphysicalactivityquestionnairerpaqinteneuropeancountries
AT matthaeusvigl validityofelectronicallyadministeredrecentphysicalactivityquestionnairerpaqinteneuropeancountries
AT paulwfranks validityofelectronicallyadministeredrecentphysicalactivityquestionnairerpaqinteneuropeancountries
AT nicholaswareham validityofelectronicallyadministeredrecentphysicalactivityquestionnairerpaqinteneuropeancountries
AT ulfekelund validityofelectronicallyadministeredrecentphysicalactivityquestionnairerpaqinteneuropeancountries
AT sorenbrage validityofelectronicallyadministeredrecentphysicalactivityquestionnairerpaqinteneuropeancountries