Quantitative impact of immunomodulation versus oncolysis with cytokine-expressing virus therapeutics

The past century's description of oncolytic virotherapy as a cancer treatment involving specially-engineered viruses that exploit immune deficiencies to selectively lyse cancer cells is no longer adequate. Some of the most promising therapeutic candidates are now being engineered to produce im...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Peter S. Kim, Joseph J. Crivelli, Il-Kyu Choi, Chae-Ok Yun, Joanna R. Wares
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AIMS Press 2015-03-01
Series:Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.aimspress.com/article/doi/10.3934/mbe.2015.12.841
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832590153348022272
author Peter S. Kim
Joseph J. Crivelli
Il-Kyu Choi
Chae-Ok Yun
Joanna R. Wares
author_facet Peter S. Kim
Joseph J. Crivelli
Il-Kyu Choi
Chae-Ok Yun
Joanna R. Wares
author_sort Peter S. Kim
collection DOAJ
description The past century's description of oncolytic virotherapy as a cancer treatment involving specially-engineered viruses that exploit immune deficiencies to selectively lyse cancer cells is no longer adequate. Some of the most promising therapeutic candidates are now being engineered to produce immunostimulatory factors, such as cytokines and co-stimulatory molecules, which, in addition to viral oncolysis, initiate a cytotoxic immune attack against the tumor. This study addresses the combined effects of viral oncolysis and T-cell-mediated oncolysis. We employ a mathematical model of virotherapy that induces release of cytokine IL-12 and co-stimulatory molecule 4-1BB ligand. We found that the model closely matches previously published data, and while viral oncolysis is fundamental in reducing tumor burden, increased stimulation of cytotoxic T cells leads to a short-term reduction in tumor size, but a faster relapse. In addition, we found that combinations of specialist viruses that express either IL-12 or 4-1BBL might initially act more potently against tumors than a generalist virus that simultaneously expresses both, but the advantage is likely not large enough to replace treatment using the generalist virus. Finally, according to our model and its current assumptions, virotherapy appears to be optimizable through targeted design and treatment combinations to substantially improve therapeutic outcomes.
format Article
id doaj-art-d355eeb9a46847beb9ff63d9580c54c7
institution Kabale University
issn 1551-0018
language English
publishDate 2015-03-01
publisher AIMS Press
record_format Article
series Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering
spelling doaj-art-d355eeb9a46847beb9ff63d9580c54c72025-01-24T02:32:12ZengAIMS PressMathematical Biosciences and Engineering1551-00182015-03-0112484185810.3934/mbe.2015.12.841Quantitative impact of immunomodulation versus oncolysis with cytokine-expressing virus therapeuticsPeter S. Kim0Joseph J. Crivelli1Il-Kyu Choi2Chae-Ok Yun3Joanna R. Wares4School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSWWeill Cornell Medical College, New York, NYDepartment of Bioengineering, College of Engineering, Hanyang University, 222 Wangsimni-ro, Seongdong-gu, Seoul 133-791Department of Bioengineering, College of Engineering, Hanyang University, SeoulDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Richmond, Richmond, VAThe past century's description of oncolytic virotherapy as a cancer treatment involving specially-engineered viruses that exploit immune deficiencies to selectively lyse cancer cells is no longer adequate. Some of the most promising therapeutic candidates are now being engineered to produce immunostimulatory factors, such as cytokines and co-stimulatory molecules, which, in addition to viral oncolysis, initiate a cytotoxic immune attack against the tumor. This study addresses the combined effects of viral oncolysis and T-cell-mediated oncolysis. We employ a mathematical model of virotherapy that induces release of cytokine IL-12 and co-stimulatory molecule 4-1BB ligand. We found that the model closely matches previously published data, and while viral oncolysis is fundamental in reducing tumor burden, increased stimulation of cytotoxic T cells leads to a short-term reduction in tumor size, but a faster relapse. In addition, we found that combinations of specialist viruses that express either IL-12 or 4-1BBL might initially act more potently against tumors than a generalist virus that simultaneously expresses both, but the advantage is likely not large enough to replace treatment using the generalist virus. Finally, according to our model and its current assumptions, virotherapy appears to be optimizable through targeted design and treatment combinations to substantially improve therapeutic outcomes.https://www.aimspress.com/article/doi/10.3934/mbe.2015.12.841co-stimulatory moleculesadenovirusordinary differential equations model.mathematical modelcytokinesoncolytic virotherapy
spellingShingle Peter S. Kim
Joseph J. Crivelli
Il-Kyu Choi
Chae-Ok Yun
Joanna R. Wares
Quantitative impact of immunomodulation versus oncolysis with cytokine-expressing virus therapeutics
Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering
co-stimulatory molecules
adenovirus
ordinary differential equations model.
mathematical model
cytokines
oncolytic virotherapy
title Quantitative impact of immunomodulation versus oncolysis with cytokine-expressing virus therapeutics
title_full Quantitative impact of immunomodulation versus oncolysis with cytokine-expressing virus therapeutics
title_fullStr Quantitative impact of immunomodulation versus oncolysis with cytokine-expressing virus therapeutics
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative impact of immunomodulation versus oncolysis with cytokine-expressing virus therapeutics
title_short Quantitative impact of immunomodulation versus oncolysis with cytokine-expressing virus therapeutics
title_sort quantitative impact of immunomodulation versus oncolysis with cytokine expressing virus therapeutics
topic co-stimulatory molecules
adenovirus
ordinary differential equations model.
mathematical model
cytokines
oncolytic virotherapy
url https://www.aimspress.com/article/doi/10.3934/mbe.2015.12.841
work_keys_str_mv AT peterskim quantitativeimpactofimmunomodulationversusoncolysiswithcytokineexpressingvirustherapeutics
AT josephjcrivelli quantitativeimpactofimmunomodulationversusoncolysiswithcytokineexpressingvirustherapeutics
AT ilkyuchoi quantitativeimpactofimmunomodulationversusoncolysiswithcytokineexpressingvirustherapeutics
AT chaeokyun quantitativeimpactofimmunomodulationversusoncolysiswithcytokineexpressingvirustherapeutics
AT joannarwares quantitativeimpactofimmunomodulationversusoncolysiswithcytokineexpressingvirustherapeutics