Mini-plate versus Reconstruction Plate: A Comparative Analysis of Complications in Free Fibula Osteocutaneous Flaps for Oral Cancer

Background: Advanced Oral cancers require segmental mandibulectomy, which ideally requires fibula flap reconstruction. Mini-plates or reconstruction plates are used for fibula fixation as per the surgeon’s preference, but the complication rates of each have hardly been studied. The purpose of this s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rithin George, Sandeep Vijay, Anoop Attakkil, Raveena Nair, Linu Thomas, Aswin Mullath
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2023-12-01
Series:Journal of Head & Neck Physicians and Surgeons
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jhnps.jhnps_58_23
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832590917691768832
author Rithin George
Sandeep Vijay
Anoop Attakkil
Raveena Nair
Linu Thomas
Aswin Mullath
author_facet Rithin George
Sandeep Vijay
Anoop Attakkil
Raveena Nair
Linu Thomas
Aswin Mullath
author_sort Rithin George
collection DOAJ
description Background: Advanced Oral cancers require segmental mandibulectomy, which ideally requires fibula flap reconstruction. Mini-plates or reconstruction plates are used for fibula fixation as per the surgeon’s preference, but the complication rates of each have hardly been studied. The purpose of this study was to find the incidence of plate-related complications, the factors attributing to it, and the difference in complication rates between mini-plate and reconstruction plate for fibula flap fixation exclusively in oral cancer patients who underwent segmental mandibulectomy as part of ablative surgery. Materials and Methods: The study was a retrospective observational study of oral cancer patients who underwent free fibula osteocutaneous flap reconstruction for mandibulectomy defects from November 2010 to November 2020 at a tertiary cancer center in India. Statistical Methods: Chi-square test, Fisher’s exact test. Results: Thirty-nine patients were included in the study and the mean follow-up period was 31 months. Seventeen of them had mini-plate fixation, 16 had reconstruction plate fixation and in two patients, both were used. About 25.64% of patients had complications. In the mini-plate group, 11.7% of patients had complications whereas 44.4% had complications in the recon plate group. 9/32 patients who took adjuvant treatment had complications, and in this subset of patients, there was a significant difference in the incidence of complications between the mini and recon plate groups (P = 0.03). Conclusion: Mini-plates are associated with less complications while used for fixation in microvascular fibula osteocutaneous flaps in oral cavity malignancy who are potential candidates for adjuvant treatment.
format Article
id doaj-art-d34979a552ca42ac8cffe04065d42ee6
institution Kabale University
issn 2347-8128
language English
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Head & Neck Physicians and Surgeons
spelling doaj-art-d34979a552ca42ac8cffe04065d42ee62025-01-23T05:49:52ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Head & Neck Physicians and Surgeons2347-81282023-12-0111212112510.4103/jhnps.jhnps_58_23Mini-plate versus Reconstruction Plate: A Comparative Analysis of Complications in Free Fibula Osteocutaneous Flaps for Oral CancerRithin GeorgeSandeep VijayAnoop AttakkilRaveena NairLinu ThomasAswin MullathBackground: Advanced Oral cancers require segmental mandibulectomy, which ideally requires fibula flap reconstruction. Mini-plates or reconstruction plates are used for fibula fixation as per the surgeon’s preference, but the complication rates of each have hardly been studied. The purpose of this study was to find the incidence of plate-related complications, the factors attributing to it, and the difference in complication rates between mini-plate and reconstruction plate for fibula flap fixation exclusively in oral cancer patients who underwent segmental mandibulectomy as part of ablative surgery. Materials and Methods: The study was a retrospective observational study of oral cancer patients who underwent free fibula osteocutaneous flap reconstruction for mandibulectomy defects from November 2010 to November 2020 at a tertiary cancer center in India. Statistical Methods: Chi-square test, Fisher’s exact test. Results: Thirty-nine patients were included in the study and the mean follow-up period was 31 months. Seventeen of them had mini-plate fixation, 16 had reconstruction plate fixation and in two patients, both were used. About 25.64% of patients had complications. In the mini-plate group, 11.7% of patients had complications whereas 44.4% had complications in the recon plate group. 9/32 patients who took adjuvant treatment had complications, and in this subset of patients, there was a significant difference in the incidence of complications between the mini and recon plate groups (P = 0.03). Conclusion: Mini-plates are associated with less complications while used for fixation in microvascular fibula osteocutaneous flaps in oral cavity malignancy who are potential candidates for adjuvant treatment.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jhnps.jhnps_58_23fibula flapmini plateplate exposurereconstruction plate
spellingShingle Rithin George
Sandeep Vijay
Anoop Attakkil
Raveena Nair
Linu Thomas
Aswin Mullath
Mini-plate versus Reconstruction Plate: A Comparative Analysis of Complications in Free Fibula Osteocutaneous Flaps for Oral Cancer
Journal of Head & Neck Physicians and Surgeons
fibula flap
mini plate
plate exposure
reconstruction plate
title Mini-plate versus Reconstruction Plate: A Comparative Analysis of Complications in Free Fibula Osteocutaneous Flaps for Oral Cancer
title_full Mini-plate versus Reconstruction Plate: A Comparative Analysis of Complications in Free Fibula Osteocutaneous Flaps for Oral Cancer
title_fullStr Mini-plate versus Reconstruction Plate: A Comparative Analysis of Complications in Free Fibula Osteocutaneous Flaps for Oral Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Mini-plate versus Reconstruction Plate: A Comparative Analysis of Complications in Free Fibula Osteocutaneous Flaps for Oral Cancer
title_short Mini-plate versus Reconstruction Plate: A Comparative Analysis of Complications in Free Fibula Osteocutaneous Flaps for Oral Cancer
title_sort mini plate versus reconstruction plate a comparative analysis of complications in free fibula osteocutaneous flaps for oral cancer
topic fibula flap
mini plate
plate exposure
reconstruction plate
url https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jhnps.jhnps_58_23
work_keys_str_mv AT rithingeorge miniplateversusreconstructionplateacomparativeanalysisofcomplicationsinfreefibulaosteocutaneousflapsfororalcancer
AT sandeepvijay miniplateversusreconstructionplateacomparativeanalysisofcomplicationsinfreefibulaosteocutaneousflapsfororalcancer
AT anoopattakkil miniplateversusreconstructionplateacomparativeanalysisofcomplicationsinfreefibulaosteocutaneousflapsfororalcancer
AT raveenanair miniplateversusreconstructionplateacomparativeanalysisofcomplicationsinfreefibulaosteocutaneousflapsfororalcancer
AT linuthomas miniplateversusreconstructionplateacomparativeanalysisofcomplicationsinfreefibulaosteocutaneousflapsfororalcancer
AT aswinmullath miniplateversusreconstructionplateacomparativeanalysisofcomplicationsinfreefibulaosteocutaneousflapsfororalcancer