Learning about causal relations that change over time: primacy and recency over long timeframes in causal judgments and memory

Abstract Being able to notice that a cause–effect relation is getting stronger or weaker is important for adapting to one’s environment and deciding how to use the cause in the future. We conducted an experiment in which participants learned about a cause–effect relation that either got stronger or...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Benjamin M. Rottman, Yiwen Zhang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2025-02-01
Series:Cognitive Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-025-00614-9
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850190430424006656
author Benjamin M. Rottman
Yiwen Zhang
author_facet Benjamin M. Rottman
Yiwen Zhang
author_sort Benjamin M. Rottman
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Being able to notice that a cause–effect relation is getting stronger or weaker is important for adapting to one’s environment and deciding how to use the cause in the future. We conducted an experiment in which participants learned about a cause–effect relation that either got stronger or weaker over time. The experiment was conducted with a typical procedure in which the learning cases were presented rapidly, and with a mobile phone procedure, in which participants experienced the cause–effect relation over 24 days. First, we found that people could detect the change in contingency. They were better at doing so in the artificial short timeframe task, but still could do so in the more realistic long timeframe task. Second, when making summary judgments about the cause–effect relation, participants exhibited a recency effect for most measures in the long timeframe, but did not exhibit a primacy or recency effect in the short timeframe. Third, though participants’ episodic memories for individual cause–effect events in the learning sequence were quite poor, they did exhibit primacy and recency effects in the short timeframe; these were attenuated in the long timeframe. These findings raise fundamental questions about causal learning; they suggest that people automatically recognize changes and store representations of the contingency during different phases of learning, but this ability is not predicted by most existing theories of causal learning.
format Article
id doaj-art-d3368edefa454695bb2fbf4ffe68c3c0
institution OA Journals
issn 2365-7464
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series Cognitive Research
spelling doaj-art-d3368edefa454695bb2fbf4ffe68c3c02025-08-20T02:15:17ZengSpringerOpenCognitive Research2365-74642025-02-0110112310.1186/s41235-025-00614-9Learning about causal relations that change over time: primacy and recency over long timeframes in causal judgments and memoryBenjamin M. Rottman0Yiwen Zhang1University of PittsburghUniversity of PittsburghAbstract Being able to notice that a cause–effect relation is getting stronger or weaker is important for adapting to one’s environment and deciding how to use the cause in the future. We conducted an experiment in which participants learned about a cause–effect relation that either got stronger or weaker over time. The experiment was conducted with a typical procedure in which the learning cases were presented rapidly, and with a mobile phone procedure, in which participants experienced the cause–effect relation over 24 days. First, we found that people could detect the change in contingency. They were better at doing so in the artificial short timeframe task, but still could do so in the more realistic long timeframe task. Second, when making summary judgments about the cause–effect relation, participants exhibited a recency effect for most measures in the long timeframe, but did not exhibit a primacy or recency effect in the short timeframe. Third, though participants’ episodic memories for individual cause–effect events in the learning sequence were quite poor, they did exhibit primacy and recency effects in the short timeframe; these were attenuated in the long timeframe. These findings raise fundamental questions about causal learning; they suggest that people automatically recognize changes and store representations of the contingency during different phases of learning, but this ability is not predicted by most existing theories of causal learning.https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-025-00614-9Causal learningOrder effectsSerial position effectPrimacyRecency
spellingShingle Benjamin M. Rottman
Yiwen Zhang
Learning about causal relations that change over time: primacy and recency over long timeframes in causal judgments and memory
Cognitive Research
Causal learning
Order effects
Serial position effect
Primacy
Recency
title Learning about causal relations that change over time: primacy and recency over long timeframes in causal judgments and memory
title_full Learning about causal relations that change over time: primacy and recency over long timeframes in causal judgments and memory
title_fullStr Learning about causal relations that change over time: primacy and recency over long timeframes in causal judgments and memory
title_full_unstemmed Learning about causal relations that change over time: primacy and recency over long timeframes in causal judgments and memory
title_short Learning about causal relations that change over time: primacy and recency over long timeframes in causal judgments and memory
title_sort learning about causal relations that change over time primacy and recency over long timeframes in causal judgments and memory
topic Causal learning
Order effects
Serial position effect
Primacy
Recency
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-025-00614-9
work_keys_str_mv AT benjaminmrottman learningaboutcausalrelationsthatchangeovertimeprimacyandrecencyoverlongtimeframesincausaljudgmentsandmemory
AT yiwenzhang learningaboutcausalrelationsthatchangeovertimeprimacyandrecencyoverlongtimeframesincausaljudgmentsandmemory