Quantum Algorithms’ Approach: A Case Study on Bladeless Wind Turbine and Solar Panel
The researched data shows that quantum algorithms have been mostly used for battery’s chemistry and conventional grid systems. These algorithms have proved to be computationally cheaper as a common meritorious aspect in almost all implementations. However, usage of quantum algorithms to i...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
IEEE
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | IEEE Access |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11005493/ |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850153606775308288 |
|---|---|
| author | Piyush Kumar Sinha R. Marimuthu |
| author_facet | Piyush Kumar Sinha R. Marimuthu |
| author_sort | Piyush Kumar Sinha |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The researched data shows that quantum algorithms have been mostly used for battery’s chemistry and conventional grid systems. These algorithms have proved to be computationally cheaper as a common meritorious aspect in almost all implementations. However, usage of quantum algorithms to integrate two renewable energy systems is yet to be explored. This study investigates the application of quantum algorithms—Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE), Variational Quantum Deflation (VQD), Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA), and Quantum Amplitude Estimation (QAE)—to optimize energy extraction from solar panels and bladeless wind turbines. Nine different optimizers are used on 3066 and 11547 datapoints of wind and solar respectively, to comment about optimality between QAOA, VQD and VQE. Results demonstrate that optimizers like NELDER_MEAD and COBYLA excel in convergence speed, whereas in case of energy minimization SPSA and SLSQP for VQE, COBYLA and P_BFGS for VQD have outperformed other optimizers. QAOA effectively tackles combinatorial optimization tasks as convergence speed for all optimizers has been relatively rapid. Since VQE, VQD and QAOA have not been accurate in finding optimal data point, hence QAE is utilized. Additionally, QAE’s precision in amplifying high-probability quantum states aligns well with the periodic and structured nature of wind and solar energy datasets. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-d31fc546f78d48d99172ea3100d762f1 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 2169-3536 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
| publisher | IEEE |
| record_format | Article |
| series | IEEE Access |
| spelling | doaj-art-d31fc546f78d48d99172ea3100d762f12025-08-20T02:25:40ZengIEEEIEEE Access2169-35362025-01-0113859518596610.1109/ACCESS.2025.357039311005493Quantum Algorithms’ Approach: A Case Study on Bladeless Wind Turbine and Solar PanelPiyush Kumar Sinha0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6086-3244R. Marimuthu1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5021-7054School of Electrical Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, IndiaSchool of Electrical Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, IndiaThe researched data shows that quantum algorithms have been mostly used for battery’s chemistry and conventional grid systems. These algorithms have proved to be computationally cheaper as a common meritorious aspect in almost all implementations. However, usage of quantum algorithms to integrate two renewable energy systems is yet to be explored. This study investigates the application of quantum algorithms—Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE), Variational Quantum Deflation (VQD), Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA), and Quantum Amplitude Estimation (QAE)—to optimize energy extraction from solar panels and bladeless wind turbines. Nine different optimizers are used on 3066 and 11547 datapoints of wind and solar respectively, to comment about optimality between QAOA, VQD and VQE. Results demonstrate that optimizers like NELDER_MEAD and COBYLA excel in convergence speed, whereas in case of energy minimization SPSA and SLSQP for VQE, COBYLA and P_BFGS for VQD have outperformed other optimizers. QAOA effectively tackles combinatorial optimization tasks as convergence speed for all optimizers has been relatively rapid. Since VQE, VQD and QAOA have not been accurate in finding optimal data point, hence QAE is utilized. Additionally, QAE’s precision in amplifying high-probability quantum states aligns well with the periodic and structured nature of wind and solar energy datasets.https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11005493/Bladeless wind turbinequantum approximate optimization algorithmquantum amplitude estimationsolar panelvariational quantum deflationvariational quantum eigensolver |
| spellingShingle | Piyush Kumar Sinha R. Marimuthu Quantum Algorithms’ Approach: A Case Study on Bladeless Wind Turbine and Solar Panel IEEE Access Bladeless wind turbine quantum approximate optimization algorithm quantum amplitude estimation solar panel variational quantum deflation variational quantum eigensolver |
| title | Quantum Algorithms’ Approach: A Case Study on Bladeless Wind Turbine and Solar Panel |
| title_full | Quantum Algorithms’ Approach: A Case Study on Bladeless Wind Turbine and Solar Panel |
| title_fullStr | Quantum Algorithms’ Approach: A Case Study on Bladeless Wind Turbine and Solar Panel |
| title_full_unstemmed | Quantum Algorithms’ Approach: A Case Study on Bladeless Wind Turbine and Solar Panel |
| title_short | Quantum Algorithms’ Approach: A Case Study on Bladeless Wind Turbine and Solar Panel |
| title_sort | quantum algorithms x2019 approach a case study on bladeless wind turbine and solar panel |
| topic | Bladeless wind turbine quantum approximate optimization algorithm quantum amplitude estimation solar panel variational quantum deflation variational quantum eigensolver |
| url | https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11005493/ |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT piyushkumarsinha quantumalgorithmsx2019approachacasestudyonbladelesswindturbineandsolarpanel AT rmarimuthu quantumalgorithmsx2019approachacasestudyonbladelesswindturbineandsolarpanel |