The current state of the quality of homeopathic clinical research

Homeopathy is a system of therapeutics that treats disease with highly diluted substances based on the Law of Similars, which holds that “like cures like.” Despite widespread use, homeopathy lacks a comprehensive and robust evidence base.We examined the state of homeopathic clinical research by crit...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Patricia M. Herman, Cindy C. Crawford, Margaret A. Maglione, Sydne J. Newberry, Paul S. Amieux, Kimberlee Blyden-Taylor, Raheleh Khorsan, Marcia Prenguber, Elizabeth Rice, Andy Shollar, Tiesha Tyson, Nazanin Vassighi, Ian D. Coulter
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-03-01
Series:Complementary Therapies in Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965229924000967
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832582267427356672
author Patricia M. Herman
Cindy C. Crawford
Margaret A. Maglione
Sydne J. Newberry
Paul S. Amieux
Kimberlee Blyden-Taylor
Raheleh Khorsan
Marcia Prenguber
Elizabeth Rice
Andy Shollar
Tiesha Tyson
Nazanin Vassighi
Ian D. Coulter
author_facet Patricia M. Herman
Cindy C. Crawford
Margaret A. Maglione
Sydne J. Newberry
Paul S. Amieux
Kimberlee Blyden-Taylor
Raheleh Khorsan
Marcia Prenguber
Elizabeth Rice
Andy Shollar
Tiesha Tyson
Nazanin Vassighi
Ian D. Coulter
author_sort Patricia M. Herman
collection DOAJ
description Homeopathy is a system of therapeutics that treats disease with highly diluted substances based on the Law of Similars, which holds that “like cures like.” Despite widespread use, homeopathy lacks a comprehensive and robust evidence base.We examined the state of homeopathic clinical research by critically assessing the overall quality of peer-reviewed, recently published, English-language, homeopathic clinical research in terms of internal, external, and model validity using standard and homeopathic-specific instruments. Further, we convened an international panel of nine experts in research methods and homeopathy to identify gaps in homeopathic research and prioritize areas for future study.We reviewed 99 clinical research studies targeting a wide range of populations and conditions. Studies were conducted in Western and Asian countries, with the largest number (30 percent) conducted in India. Of the 99 studies reviewed, 85 were controlled trials; 79 of these were randomized. There were many areas where the quality of the studies could be improved. About two-thirds of the 85 controlled trials had either high (42 percent) or unclear (24 percent) risk of bias according to internationally recognized standards for internal validity. Of the 14 observational (cohort) studies, over one-third did not control for important confounders in the outcome analyses. Regarding external validity, adherence was reported in less than a third of studies (n=31). Forty percent of studies (79 % of observational studies) did not report on safety. Regarding model validity, fewer than two-thirds of the studies were consistent with homeopathic principles.Our expert panel was mixed on whether the homeopathic research literature was missing important populations and/or conditions, and they suggested a variety of priority areas. Panelists also expressed a variety of opinions about the types of homeopathy that should be prioritized for future study but also noted that since homeopathic practice differs by country, each country may have different priorities.Panelists agreed with the findings of the literature review that the research literature was at least somewhat deficient in all three types of validity. Although our assessment of validity was [by necessity] based only on what was reported, this assessment suggests the need for both better reporting and higher quality research. They recommended the use of reporting guidelines to improve all types of validity, the identification of exemplar studies to help guide researchers to improve internal validity, and, given the limitations of the instruments available to measure external and model validity, that these instruments be validated and configured to provide summary scores. Finally, substantial discussion addressed the need to bring more research expertise into homeopathic studies, both by better training homeopathic researchers and by collaborating with experienced conventional medicine research groups.
format Article
id doaj-art-d2d69588bccb4874a7b4b372b2d9f132
institution Kabale University
issn 0965-2299
language English
publishDate 2025-03-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Complementary Therapies in Medicine
spelling doaj-art-d2d69588bccb4874a7b4b372b2d9f1322025-01-30T05:12:50ZengElsevierComplementary Therapies in Medicine0965-22992025-03-0188103108The current state of the quality of homeopathic clinical researchPatricia M. Herman0Cindy C. Crawford1Margaret A. Maglione2Sydne J. Newberry3Paul S. Amieux4Kimberlee Blyden-Taylor5Raheleh Khorsan6Marcia Prenguber7Elizabeth Rice8Andy Shollar9Tiesha Tyson10Nazanin Vassighi11Ian D. Coulter12RAND, 1776 Main Street, PO Box 2138, Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138, USA; Corresponding author.RAND, 1776 Main Street, PO Box 2138, Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138, USARAND, 1776 Main Street, PO Box 2138, Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138, USARAND, 1776 Main Street, PO Box 2138, Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138, USABastyr University Research Institute, 14500 Juanita Drive NE, Kenmore, WA 98028, USASonoran University of Health Sciences, 2140 E Broadway Rd, Tempe, AZ 85252, USASouthern California University of the Health Sciences, 16200 E. Amber Valley Drive, P.O. Box 1166, Whittier, CA 90609-1166, USAUniversity of Western States, 8000 NE Tillamook Street, Portland, OR 97213, USABastyr University San Diego, 4106 Sorrento Valley Boulevard, San Diego, CA 92121, USASouthern California University of the Health Sciences, 16200 E. Amber Valley Drive, P.O. Box 1166, Whittier, CA 90609-1166, USASouthern California University of the Health Sciences, 16200 E. Amber Valley Drive, P.O. Box 1166, Whittier, CA 90609-1166, USABastyr University San Diego, 4106 Sorrento Valley Boulevard, San Diego, CA 92121, USARAND, 1776 Main Street, PO Box 2138, Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138, USAHomeopathy is a system of therapeutics that treats disease with highly diluted substances based on the Law of Similars, which holds that “like cures like.” Despite widespread use, homeopathy lacks a comprehensive and robust evidence base.We examined the state of homeopathic clinical research by critically assessing the overall quality of peer-reviewed, recently published, English-language, homeopathic clinical research in terms of internal, external, and model validity using standard and homeopathic-specific instruments. Further, we convened an international panel of nine experts in research methods and homeopathy to identify gaps in homeopathic research and prioritize areas for future study.We reviewed 99 clinical research studies targeting a wide range of populations and conditions. Studies were conducted in Western and Asian countries, with the largest number (30 percent) conducted in India. Of the 99 studies reviewed, 85 were controlled trials; 79 of these were randomized. There were many areas where the quality of the studies could be improved. About two-thirds of the 85 controlled trials had either high (42 percent) or unclear (24 percent) risk of bias according to internationally recognized standards for internal validity. Of the 14 observational (cohort) studies, over one-third did not control for important confounders in the outcome analyses. Regarding external validity, adherence was reported in less than a third of studies (n=31). Forty percent of studies (79 % of observational studies) did not report on safety. Regarding model validity, fewer than two-thirds of the studies were consistent with homeopathic principles.Our expert panel was mixed on whether the homeopathic research literature was missing important populations and/or conditions, and they suggested a variety of priority areas. Panelists also expressed a variety of opinions about the types of homeopathy that should be prioritized for future study but also noted that since homeopathic practice differs by country, each country may have different priorities.Panelists agreed with the findings of the literature review that the research literature was at least somewhat deficient in all three types of validity. Although our assessment of validity was [by necessity] based only on what was reported, this assessment suggests the need for both better reporting and higher quality research. They recommended the use of reporting guidelines to improve all types of validity, the identification of exemplar studies to help guide researchers to improve internal validity, and, given the limitations of the instruments available to measure external and model validity, that these instruments be validated and configured to provide summary scores. Finally, substantial discussion addressed the need to bring more research expertise into homeopathic studies, both by better training homeopathic researchers and by collaborating with experienced conventional medicine research groups.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965229924000967HomeopathyInternal validityExternal validityModel validityExpert panelHomeopathic research
spellingShingle Patricia M. Herman
Cindy C. Crawford
Margaret A. Maglione
Sydne J. Newberry
Paul S. Amieux
Kimberlee Blyden-Taylor
Raheleh Khorsan
Marcia Prenguber
Elizabeth Rice
Andy Shollar
Tiesha Tyson
Nazanin Vassighi
Ian D. Coulter
The current state of the quality of homeopathic clinical research
Complementary Therapies in Medicine
Homeopathy
Internal validity
External validity
Model validity
Expert panel
Homeopathic research
title The current state of the quality of homeopathic clinical research
title_full The current state of the quality of homeopathic clinical research
title_fullStr The current state of the quality of homeopathic clinical research
title_full_unstemmed The current state of the quality of homeopathic clinical research
title_short The current state of the quality of homeopathic clinical research
title_sort current state of the quality of homeopathic clinical research
topic Homeopathy
Internal validity
External validity
Model validity
Expert panel
Homeopathic research
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965229924000967
work_keys_str_mv AT patriciamherman thecurrentstateofthequalityofhomeopathicclinicalresearch
AT cindyccrawford thecurrentstateofthequalityofhomeopathicclinicalresearch
AT margaretamaglione thecurrentstateofthequalityofhomeopathicclinicalresearch
AT sydnejnewberry thecurrentstateofthequalityofhomeopathicclinicalresearch
AT paulsamieux thecurrentstateofthequalityofhomeopathicclinicalresearch
AT kimberleeblydentaylor thecurrentstateofthequalityofhomeopathicclinicalresearch
AT rahelehkhorsan thecurrentstateofthequalityofhomeopathicclinicalresearch
AT marciaprenguber thecurrentstateofthequalityofhomeopathicclinicalresearch
AT elizabethrice thecurrentstateofthequalityofhomeopathicclinicalresearch
AT andyshollar thecurrentstateofthequalityofhomeopathicclinicalresearch
AT tieshatyson thecurrentstateofthequalityofhomeopathicclinicalresearch
AT nazaninvassighi thecurrentstateofthequalityofhomeopathicclinicalresearch
AT iandcoulter thecurrentstateofthequalityofhomeopathicclinicalresearch
AT patriciamherman currentstateofthequalityofhomeopathicclinicalresearch
AT cindyccrawford currentstateofthequalityofhomeopathicclinicalresearch
AT margaretamaglione currentstateofthequalityofhomeopathicclinicalresearch
AT sydnejnewberry currentstateofthequalityofhomeopathicclinicalresearch
AT paulsamieux currentstateofthequalityofhomeopathicclinicalresearch
AT kimberleeblydentaylor currentstateofthequalityofhomeopathicclinicalresearch
AT rahelehkhorsan currentstateofthequalityofhomeopathicclinicalresearch
AT marciaprenguber currentstateofthequalityofhomeopathicclinicalresearch
AT elizabethrice currentstateofthequalityofhomeopathicclinicalresearch
AT andyshollar currentstateofthequalityofhomeopathicclinicalresearch
AT tieshatyson currentstateofthequalityofhomeopathicclinicalresearch
AT nazaninvassighi currentstateofthequalityofhomeopathicclinicalresearch
AT iandcoulter currentstateofthequalityofhomeopathicclinicalresearch