Cleaning methods for biosafety cabinet to eliminate residual mycoplasmas, viruses, and endotoxins after changeover

Introduction: Cell-processing operations can potentially contaminate biosafety cabinets, which should be maintained sterile. However, unintended contamination can occur owing to the presence of viruses, mycoplasmas, and bacteria in the raw materials. Moreover, although several methods for expunging...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mitsuru Mizuno, Saeri Kimbara, Hanae Ichise, Natsumi Ishikawa, Yuto Nishihara, Miwako Nishio, Ichiro Sekiya
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-03-01
Series:Regenerative Therapy
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352320424002128
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850032864506150912
author Mitsuru Mizuno
Saeri Kimbara
Hanae Ichise
Natsumi Ishikawa
Yuto Nishihara
Miwako Nishio
Ichiro Sekiya
author_facet Mitsuru Mizuno
Saeri Kimbara
Hanae Ichise
Natsumi Ishikawa
Yuto Nishihara
Miwako Nishio
Ichiro Sekiya
author_sort Mitsuru Mizuno
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Cell-processing operations can potentially contaminate biosafety cabinets, which should be maintained sterile. However, unintended contamination can occur owing to the presence of viruses, mycoplasmas, and bacteria in the raw materials. Moreover, although several methods for expunging these contaminants have been proposed, an optimal method has not yet been determined. Additionally, the effectiveness of conventional methods for eliminating these contaminants remains unclear owing to their unique characteristics and potential resistances to cleaning. Therefore, this paper proposes a risk-based approach to identify appropriate cleaning methods and reduce the likelihood of cross-contamination in biosafety cabinets by these contaminants. Methods: Various cleaning methods for eliminating mycoplasmas, viruses, and endotoxins from biosafety cabinets were evaluated, including ultraviolet (UV) irradiation at 200 mJ/cm2 for 20 min and wiping with disinfectants such as distilled water, benzalkonium chloride (BKC), and 70 % ethanol (ETH). The effectiveness of each method was evaluated by applying the contaminants on stainless steel plates and cleaning them using each method. Mycoplasma orale was cultured for 2 weeks in a liquid medium after cleaning. Feline calicivirus (FCV) was used for evaluating the virus-cleaning effectiveness and its presence was tested using the TCID50 test, whereas endotoxins obtained from the dried extract of Escherichia coli were measured via endotoxin testing. Results: UV irradiation and wiping with BKC inhibited the growth of mycoplasma and significant decreased their presence compared with the other cleaning methods. Notably, mycoplasma were detected after wiping all SUS304 plates with ETH, which is a widely used cleaning method. Additionally, the cleaning efficacy for virus showed that the TCID50 of the wet group was 132,000 TCID50/plate, whereas those after UV irradiation or cleaning with BKC or DW were below the detection limit. Finally, UV irradiation did not significantly reduce the endotoxin production compared with that in the dry group. Additionally, wiping with ETH did not significantly reduce endotoxins compared with the dry group and their residues were higher than those detected after wiping with BKC or DW. Conclusions: The changeover protocols currently employed in most cell-processing facilities may be ineffective as pathogenic or nonpathogenic materials may remain even after ETH wiping, leading to unintended cross-contamination. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to provide reference data of different cleaning methods for mycoplasmas, viruses, and endotoxins in cell-product manufacturing facilities, and can potentially support the development of evidence-based management strategies for ensuring safe cell-product processing.
format Article
id doaj-art-d29f2594c37d4c3b9407f6b95da732ea
institution DOAJ
issn 2352-3204
language English
publishDate 2025-03-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Regenerative Therapy
spelling doaj-art-d29f2594c37d4c3b9407f6b95da732ea2025-08-20T02:58:29ZengElsevierRegenerative Therapy2352-32042025-03-0128738010.1016/j.reth.2024.11.020Cleaning methods for biosafety cabinet to eliminate residual mycoplasmas, viruses, and endotoxins after changeoverMitsuru Mizuno0Saeri Kimbara1Hanae Ichise2Natsumi Ishikawa3Yuto Nishihara4Miwako Nishio5Ichiro Sekiya6Center for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Institute of Science Tokyo, 1-5-45, Bunkyo-ku, Yushima, Tokyo 113-8519, Japan; Center for Transfusion Medicine and Cell Therapy, Institute of Science Tokyo Hospital, 1-5-45, Bunkyo-ku, Yushima, Tokyo 113-8519, Japan; Corresponding author. Center for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Institute of Science Tokyo, 1-5-45, Bunkyo-ku, Yushima, Tokyo 113-8519, Japan.Center for Transfusion Medicine and Cell Therapy, Institute of Science Tokyo Hospital, 1-5-45, Bunkyo-ku, Yushima, Tokyo 113-8519, JapanCenter for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Institute of Science Tokyo, 1-5-45, Bunkyo-ku, Yushima, Tokyo 113-8519, JapanCenter for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Institute of Science Tokyo, 1-5-45, Bunkyo-ku, Yushima, Tokyo 113-8519, JapanDepartment of Hematology and Biophysical Systems Analysis, Institute of Science Tokyo, 1-5-45, Bunkyo-ku, Yushima, Tokyo 113-8519, JapanDepartment of Hematology and Biophysical Systems Analysis, Institute of Science Tokyo, 1-5-45, Bunkyo-ku, Yushima, Tokyo 113-8519, JapanCenter for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Institute of Science Tokyo, 1-5-45, Bunkyo-ku, Yushima, Tokyo 113-8519, Japan; Center for Transfusion Medicine and Cell Therapy, Institute of Science Tokyo Hospital, 1-5-45, Bunkyo-ku, Yushima, Tokyo 113-8519, JapanIntroduction: Cell-processing operations can potentially contaminate biosafety cabinets, which should be maintained sterile. However, unintended contamination can occur owing to the presence of viruses, mycoplasmas, and bacteria in the raw materials. Moreover, although several methods for expunging these contaminants have been proposed, an optimal method has not yet been determined. Additionally, the effectiveness of conventional methods for eliminating these contaminants remains unclear owing to their unique characteristics and potential resistances to cleaning. Therefore, this paper proposes a risk-based approach to identify appropriate cleaning methods and reduce the likelihood of cross-contamination in biosafety cabinets by these contaminants. Methods: Various cleaning methods for eliminating mycoplasmas, viruses, and endotoxins from biosafety cabinets were evaluated, including ultraviolet (UV) irradiation at 200 mJ/cm2 for 20 min and wiping with disinfectants such as distilled water, benzalkonium chloride (BKC), and 70 % ethanol (ETH). The effectiveness of each method was evaluated by applying the contaminants on stainless steel plates and cleaning them using each method. Mycoplasma orale was cultured for 2 weeks in a liquid medium after cleaning. Feline calicivirus (FCV) was used for evaluating the virus-cleaning effectiveness and its presence was tested using the TCID50 test, whereas endotoxins obtained from the dried extract of Escherichia coli were measured via endotoxin testing. Results: UV irradiation and wiping with BKC inhibited the growth of mycoplasma and significant decreased their presence compared with the other cleaning methods. Notably, mycoplasma were detected after wiping all SUS304 plates with ETH, which is a widely used cleaning method. Additionally, the cleaning efficacy for virus showed that the TCID50 of the wet group was 132,000 TCID50/plate, whereas those after UV irradiation or cleaning with BKC or DW were below the detection limit. Finally, UV irradiation did not significantly reduce the endotoxin production compared with that in the dry group. Additionally, wiping with ETH did not significantly reduce endotoxins compared with the dry group and their residues were higher than those detected after wiping with BKC or DW. Conclusions: The changeover protocols currently employed in most cell-processing facilities may be ineffective as pathogenic or nonpathogenic materials may remain even after ETH wiping, leading to unintended cross-contamination. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to provide reference data of different cleaning methods for mycoplasmas, viruses, and endotoxins in cell-product manufacturing facilities, and can potentially support the development of evidence-based management strategies for ensuring safe cell-product processing.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352320424002128MycoplasmaVirusEndotoxinChangeoverCross-contamination riskBiosafety cabinet
spellingShingle Mitsuru Mizuno
Saeri Kimbara
Hanae Ichise
Natsumi Ishikawa
Yuto Nishihara
Miwako Nishio
Ichiro Sekiya
Cleaning methods for biosafety cabinet to eliminate residual mycoplasmas, viruses, and endotoxins after changeover
Regenerative Therapy
Mycoplasma
Virus
Endotoxin
Changeover
Cross-contamination risk
Biosafety cabinet
title Cleaning methods for biosafety cabinet to eliminate residual mycoplasmas, viruses, and endotoxins after changeover
title_full Cleaning methods for biosafety cabinet to eliminate residual mycoplasmas, viruses, and endotoxins after changeover
title_fullStr Cleaning methods for biosafety cabinet to eliminate residual mycoplasmas, viruses, and endotoxins after changeover
title_full_unstemmed Cleaning methods for biosafety cabinet to eliminate residual mycoplasmas, viruses, and endotoxins after changeover
title_short Cleaning methods for biosafety cabinet to eliminate residual mycoplasmas, viruses, and endotoxins after changeover
title_sort cleaning methods for biosafety cabinet to eliminate residual mycoplasmas viruses and endotoxins after changeover
topic Mycoplasma
Virus
Endotoxin
Changeover
Cross-contamination risk
Biosafety cabinet
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352320424002128
work_keys_str_mv AT mitsurumizuno cleaningmethodsforbiosafetycabinettoeliminateresidualmycoplasmasvirusesandendotoxinsafterchangeover
AT saerikimbara cleaningmethodsforbiosafetycabinettoeliminateresidualmycoplasmasvirusesandendotoxinsafterchangeover
AT hanaeichise cleaningmethodsforbiosafetycabinettoeliminateresidualmycoplasmasvirusesandendotoxinsafterchangeover
AT natsumiishikawa cleaningmethodsforbiosafetycabinettoeliminateresidualmycoplasmasvirusesandendotoxinsafterchangeover
AT yutonishihara cleaningmethodsforbiosafetycabinettoeliminateresidualmycoplasmasvirusesandendotoxinsafterchangeover
AT miwakonishio cleaningmethodsforbiosafetycabinettoeliminateresidualmycoplasmasvirusesandendotoxinsafterchangeover
AT ichirosekiya cleaningmethodsforbiosafetycabinettoeliminateresidualmycoplasmasvirusesandendotoxinsafterchangeover