Evaluability Assessment: Clarifying Organizational Support and Data Availability

Background: Evaluability assessment (EA) emerged in the 1970s as a way to ensure a program was ready for summative evaluation. The primary purpose was assessing the presence of measurable program objectives (Trevisan, 2007), yet evaluators conducting EA encountered difficulty with unclear, ambiguous...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Joseph Hare, Timothy Guetterman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Evaluation Center at Western Michigan University 2014-07-01
Series:Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.sfu.ca/jmde/index.php/jmde_1/article/view/395
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850062063305490432
author Joseph Hare
Timothy Guetterman
author_facet Joseph Hare
Timothy Guetterman
author_sort Joseph Hare
collection DOAJ
description Background: Evaluability assessment (EA) emerged in the 1970s as a way to ensure a program was ready for summative evaluation. The primary purpose was assessing the presence of measurable program objectives (Trevisan, 2007), yet evaluators conducting EA encountered difficulty with unclear, ambiguous methods (Smith, 2005). Purpose: The purpose of this qualitative study was to clarify two aspects of evaluability assessment, organizational support and data availability. In practice, organizational stakeholders must support the evaluation project to ensure it is pursued to completion. In addition, the availability of operational data facilitates analysis of the evaluand effect. Setting: Participants from both human services and corporate organizations participated in interviews. Participants worked on evaluation projects serving in three roles: organizational stakeholder, program evaluator, and information technology personnel. Intervention: NA Research Design: A qualitative research design was selected to best understand the experiences with regard to organizational support and data sufficiency of individuals who have engaged in evaluation studies and to understand how these domains affected their ability to conduct an evaluation. Data Collection and Analysis: This study consisted of purposive sampling of 13 participants serving various roles to add breadth to the data. The researchers conducted semi-structured interviews and analyzed the data using thematic analysis. Findings: The findings indicate the importance of specific organizational and data related considerations that affect evaluability. The researchers recommend considerations that elaborate upon the existing EA framework. The recommended evaluability considerations assist evaluators in identifying ill-advised evaluations and enhancing the likelihood of success in ongoing studies.
format Article
id doaj-art-d29b0e418935454281f03e4532da71f7
institution DOAJ
issn 1556-8180
language English
publishDate 2014-07-01
publisher The Evaluation Center at Western Michigan University
record_format Article
series Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation
spelling doaj-art-d29b0e418935454281f03e4532da71f72025-08-20T02:50:00ZengThe Evaluation Center at Western Michigan UniversityJournal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation1556-81802014-07-01102310.56645/jmde.v10i23.395Evaluability Assessment: Clarifying Organizational Support and Data AvailabilityJoseph Hare0Timothy Guetterman1Center for Learning Innovation, Bellevue UniversityDepartment of Educational Psychology, University of Nebraska-LincolnBackground: Evaluability assessment (EA) emerged in the 1970s as a way to ensure a program was ready for summative evaluation. The primary purpose was assessing the presence of measurable program objectives (Trevisan, 2007), yet evaluators conducting EA encountered difficulty with unclear, ambiguous methods (Smith, 2005). Purpose: The purpose of this qualitative study was to clarify two aspects of evaluability assessment, organizational support and data availability. In practice, organizational stakeholders must support the evaluation project to ensure it is pursued to completion. In addition, the availability of operational data facilitates analysis of the evaluand effect. Setting: Participants from both human services and corporate organizations participated in interviews. Participants worked on evaluation projects serving in three roles: organizational stakeholder, program evaluator, and information technology personnel. Intervention: NA Research Design: A qualitative research design was selected to best understand the experiences with regard to organizational support and data sufficiency of individuals who have engaged in evaluation studies and to understand how these domains affected their ability to conduct an evaluation. Data Collection and Analysis: This study consisted of purposive sampling of 13 participants serving various roles to add breadth to the data. The researchers conducted semi-structured interviews and analyzed the data using thematic analysis. Findings: The findings indicate the importance of specific organizational and data related considerations that affect evaluability. The researchers recommend considerations that elaborate upon the existing EA framework. The recommended evaluability considerations assist evaluators in identifying ill-advised evaluations and enhancing the likelihood of success in ongoing studies. https://journals.sfu.ca/jmde/index.php/jmde_1/article/view/395evaluability assessmentorganizational stakeholdersdata availabilitydata qualityqualitative
spellingShingle Joseph Hare
Timothy Guetterman
Evaluability Assessment: Clarifying Organizational Support and Data Availability
Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation
evaluability assessment
organizational stakeholders
data availability
data quality
qualitative
title Evaluability Assessment: Clarifying Organizational Support and Data Availability
title_full Evaluability Assessment: Clarifying Organizational Support and Data Availability
title_fullStr Evaluability Assessment: Clarifying Organizational Support and Data Availability
title_full_unstemmed Evaluability Assessment: Clarifying Organizational Support and Data Availability
title_short Evaluability Assessment: Clarifying Organizational Support and Data Availability
title_sort evaluability assessment clarifying organizational support and data availability
topic evaluability assessment
organizational stakeholders
data availability
data quality
qualitative
url https://journals.sfu.ca/jmde/index.php/jmde_1/article/view/395
work_keys_str_mv AT josephhare evaluabilityassessmentclarifyingorganizationalsupportanddataavailability
AT timothyguetterman evaluabilityassessmentclarifyingorganizationalsupportanddataavailability