La correspondance de motifs, un outil pour l’analyse du discours ?

In the second half of the 19th century, some French literary critics proclaimed the scientific nature of their discourse and regarded scientific essays (in biology, medicine, anthropology, psychology or sociology) as models. This article proposes to conduct a preliminary study to identify a possible...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marine Riguet, Mohamed Amine Boukhaled
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: Humanistica 2020-01-01
Series:Humanités Numériques
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/revuehn/312
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841549890710142976
author Marine Riguet
Mohamed Amine Boukhaled
author_facet Marine Riguet
Mohamed Amine Boukhaled
author_sort Marine Riguet
collection DOAJ
description In the second half of the 19th century, some French literary critics proclaimed the scientific nature of their discourse and regarded scientific essays (in biology, medicine, anthropology, psychology or sociology) as models. This article proposes to conduct a preliminary study to identify a possible discursive common ground between literary criticism and the sciences at the end of the 19th century. To do so, our study is based on a computational method, using extraction and correspondence analysis (CA) for syntactic patterns. Rather than a stylistic analysis, we undertake here a transdiscursive exploration, led by the discovery of relevant patterns in a text within a given corpus.
format Article
id doaj-art-d29a085b87854dfcb5bac56c8d468289
institution Kabale University
issn 2736-2337
language fra
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Humanistica
record_format Article
series Humanités Numériques
spelling doaj-art-d29a085b87854dfcb5bac56c8d4682892025-01-10T12:52:05ZfraHumanisticaHumanités Numériques2736-23372020-01-01110.4000/revuehn.312La correspondance de motifs, un outil pour l’analyse du discours ?Marine RiguetMohamed Amine BoukhaledIn the second half of the 19th century, some French literary critics proclaimed the scientific nature of their discourse and regarded scientific essays (in biology, medicine, anthropology, psychology or sociology) as models. This article proposes to conduct a preliminary study to identify a possible discursive common ground between literary criticism and the sciences at the end of the 19th century. To do so, our study is based on a computational method, using extraction and correspondence analysis (CA) for syntactic patterns. Rather than a stylistic analysis, we undertake here a transdiscursive exploration, led by the discovery of relevant patterns in a text within a given corpus.https://journals.openedition.org/revuehn/312interdisciplinaritydiscourse analysisliterary criticismliteraturedata analysissyntactic pattern
spellingShingle Marine Riguet
Mohamed Amine Boukhaled
La correspondance de motifs, un outil pour l’analyse du discours ?
Humanités Numériques
interdisciplinarity
discourse analysis
literary criticism
literature
data analysis
syntactic pattern
title La correspondance de motifs, un outil pour l’analyse du discours ?
title_full La correspondance de motifs, un outil pour l’analyse du discours ?
title_fullStr La correspondance de motifs, un outil pour l’analyse du discours ?
title_full_unstemmed La correspondance de motifs, un outil pour l’analyse du discours ?
title_short La correspondance de motifs, un outil pour l’analyse du discours ?
title_sort la correspondance de motifs un outil pour l analyse du discours
topic interdisciplinarity
discourse analysis
literary criticism
literature
data analysis
syntactic pattern
url https://journals.openedition.org/revuehn/312
work_keys_str_mv AT marineriguet lacorrespondancedemotifsunoutilpourlanalysedudiscours
AT mohamedamineboukhaled lacorrespondancedemotifsunoutilpourlanalysedudiscours