In their own words: older persons’ experiences of participating in co-creation
Abstract Background Co-creation methods ensure that interventions are tailored to the target group by incorporating their unique insights and preferences, strengthen innovation, and facilitate implementation. Although co-creation research is becoming more common, most research exploring co-creation...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2025-05-01
|
| Series: | Research Involvement and Engagement |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-025-00725-z |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Abstract Background Co-creation methods ensure that interventions are tailored to the target group by incorporating their unique insights and preferences, strengthen innovation, and facilitate implementation. Although co-creation research is becoming more common, most research exploring co-creation focuses on the researchers’ perspectives rather than the experiences of the target population. By exploring these experiences, researchers can better understand the preferences for, and facilitators/barriers to, engagement and participation to inform future co-creation studies. This study aimed to explore older persons’ experiences and insights into participating in co-creation of an intervention to prevent falls. Methods Qualitative interviews were conducted with 13 community-dwelling older persons (aged 66–83 years) after their participation in a co-creation study developing an intervention for fall prevention. Data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Results Three themes emerged from the analysis: Diversity of co-creators enriches understanding and creativity, Interactive activities promote learning, and Supportive environments enhance collaboration. These themes describe how participating in workshops with others deepened and broadened participants’ knowledge and understanding of the subject and enabled them to contribute their experiences and perspectives. Discussing and testing exercises gave participants new insights into their physical abilities and the importance of exercise and a better understanding of the concept of motor-cognitive exercises and their role in everyday life. A respectful atmosphere where everyone shared responsibility for creating a supportive environment so all participants could express their thoughts was perceived as important by the participants. Conclusions The results underscore the potential for co-creation to enhance participants’ knowledge and understanding of the topic, as well as their own capacity. For researchers, it is important to consider how to foster an inclusive and supportive environment, thereby boosting participation, engagement and collaboration. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2056-7529 |