Metacognition and Cognitive Flexibility in Autistic and Neurotypically‐Developing Populations

ABSTRACT Purpose Whether and how metacognition is altered in individuals with autistic spectrum disorder (ASD) is intensely debated. Metacognitive deficit is claimed to be related to cognitive inflexibility, accounting for restrictive behaviors in ASD individuals. We wanted to test this hypothesis b...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mikhail Ordin, Natàlia Barbarroja, Leona Polyanskaya, Héctor M. Manrique, Miguel Castelo‐Branco
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-07-01
Series:Brain and Behavior
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.70668
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850066498990637056
author Mikhail Ordin
Natàlia Barbarroja
Leona Polyanskaya
Héctor M. Manrique
Miguel Castelo‐Branco
author_facet Mikhail Ordin
Natàlia Barbarroja
Leona Polyanskaya
Héctor M. Manrique
Miguel Castelo‐Branco
author_sort Mikhail Ordin
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT Purpose Whether and how metacognition is altered in individuals with autistic spectrum disorder (ASD) is intensely debated. Metacognitive deficit is claimed to be related to cognitive inflexibility, accounting for restrictive behaviors in ASD individuals. We wanted to test this hypothesis by measuring metacognition in ASD and in matched neurotypically developing (TD) control samples in a task that relies on visuo‐spatial cognition, in which ASD allegedly have an advantage. Methods We measured metacognition in a 3D mental rotation task. Additionally, we administered a trading game: players had to figure out the rules for maximizing the profit on each transaction. These rules changed in the middle of the game, which required that players modify their strategy to keep the profit at maximum. We measured both learning efficiency (how fast players extract the rules) and re‐learning speed (cognitive flexibility, how fast learners could adjust their behavioral responses after rules are changed). Results TD outperform ASD individuals in terms of accuracy in mental rotation but exhibited lower metacognitive efficiency (i.e., were less aware when they were more likely to make an error). No differences in learning efficiency and cognitive flexibility between TD and ASD individuals were observed. Neither did we observe an association between cognitive flexibility and metacognition. Nevertheless, both in ASD and TD populations, overconfidence in one's decisions is negatively correlated with cognitive flexibility, but not with learning efficiency. Conclusion ASD individuals can have superior metacognition in tasks that rely on visuo‐spatial cognition. Cognitive flexibility is diminished by overconfidence, not by metacognitive deficit.
format Article
id doaj-art-d25aa492d7ce439da64f2dfe24868239
institution DOAJ
issn 2162-3279
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Brain and Behavior
spelling doaj-art-d25aa492d7ce439da64f2dfe248682392025-08-20T02:48:43ZengWileyBrain and Behavior2162-32792025-07-01157n/an/a10.1002/brb3.70668Metacognition and Cognitive Flexibility in Autistic and Neurotypically‐Developing PopulationsMikhail Ordin0Natàlia Barbarroja1Leona Polyanskaya2Héctor M. Manrique3Miguel Castelo‐Branco4Laboratory of Language, Metacognition and Decision‐MakingUniversidade de Coimbra Coimbra PortugalDepartment of Linguistics and Basque Studies, Centro de Investigación Micaela PortillaUniversity of the Basque Country UPV/EHUVitoria‐GasteizSpainLaboratory of Language, Metacognition and Decision‐MakingUniversidade de Coimbra Coimbra PortugalDepartment of Psychology and SociologyUniversidad de ZaragozaAragonSpainFaculty of MedicineUniversity of CoimbraCoimbraPortugalABSTRACT Purpose Whether and how metacognition is altered in individuals with autistic spectrum disorder (ASD) is intensely debated. Metacognitive deficit is claimed to be related to cognitive inflexibility, accounting for restrictive behaviors in ASD individuals. We wanted to test this hypothesis by measuring metacognition in ASD and in matched neurotypically developing (TD) control samples in a task that relies on visuo‐spatial cognition, in which ASD allegedly have an advantage. Methods We measured metacognition in a 3D mental rotation task. Additionally, we administered a trading game: players had to figure out the rules for maximizing the profit on each transaction. These rules changed in the middle of the game, which required that players modify their strategy to keep the profit at maximum. We measured both learning efficiency (how fast players extract the rules) and re‐learning speed (cognitive flexibility, how fast learners could adjust their behavioral responses after rules are changed). Results TD outperform ASD individuals in terms of accuracy in mental rotation but exhibited lower metacognitive efficiency (i.e., were less aware when they were more likely to make an error). No differences in learning efficiency and cognitive flexibility between TD and ASD individuals were observed. Neither did we observe an association between cognitive flexibility and metacognition. Nevertheless, both in ASD and TD populations, overconfidence in one's decisions is negatively correlated with cognitive flexibility, but not with learning efficiency. Conclusion ASD individuals can have superior metacognition in tasks that rely on visuo‐spatial cognition. Cognitive flexibility is diminished by overconfidence, not by metacognitive deficit.https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.70668cognitive flexibilitydecision confidencemental rotationmetacognitionvisuospatial cognition
spellingShingle Mikhail Ordin
Natàlia Barbarroja
Leona Polyanskaya
Héctor M. Manrique
Miguel Castelo‐Branco
Metacognition and Cognitive Flexibility in Autistic and Neurotypically‐Developing Populations
Brain and Behavior
cognitive flexibility
decision confidence
mental rotation
metacognition
visuospatial cognition
title Metacognition and Cognitive Flexibility in Autistic and Neurotypically‐Developing Populations
title_full Metacognition and Cognitive Flexibility in Autistic and Neurotypically‐Developing Populations
title_fullStr Metacognition and Cognitive Flexibility in Autistic and Neurotypically‐Developing Populations
title_full_unstemmed Metacognition and Cognitive Flexibility in Autistic and Neurotypically‐Developing Populations
title_short Metacognition and Cognitive Flexibility in Autistic and Neurotypically‐Developing Populations
title_sort metacognition and cognitive flexibility in autistic and neurotypically developing populations
topic cognitive flexibility
decision confidence
mental rotation
metacognition
visuospatial cognition
url https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.70668
work_keys_str_mv AT mikhailordin metacognitionandcognitiveflexibilityinautisticandneurotypicallydevelopingpopulations
AT nataliabarbarroja metacognitionandcognitiveflexibilityinautisticandneurotypicallydevelopingpopulations
AT leonapolyanskaya metacognitionandcognitiveflexibilityinautisticandneurotypicallydevelopingpopulations
AT hectormmanrique metacognitionandcognitiveflexibilityinautisticandneurotypicallydevelopingpopulations
AT miguelcastelobranco metacognitionandcognitiveflexibilityinautisticandneurotypicallydevelopingpopulations