The MCP‐1 rs1024611 and MTHFR rs1801133 gene variations and expressions in alopecia areata: A pilot study

Abstract Background Monocyte chemoattractant protein‐1 (MCP‐1) is highly expressed by lymphocytes at skin sites affected by alopecia areata (AA). Variations in MCP‐1 as well as in methylene‐tetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR), a key enzyme related to many inflammatory pathologies, have been associate...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pardis‐Sadat Tabatabaei‐Panah, Hamideh Moravvej, Mahsa Hajihasani, Mahsa Mousavi, Ralf J. Ludwig, Reza Akbarzadeh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-02-01
Series:Immunity, Inflammation and Disease
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/iid3.564
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Background Monocyte chemoattractant protein‐1 (MCP‐1) is highly expressed by lymphocytes at skin sites affected by alopecia areata (AA). Variations in MCP‐1 as well as in methylene‐tetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR), a key enzyme related to many inflammatory pathologies, have been associated with several autoimmune disorders. This study was designed to test a possible association between MCP‐1 and MTHFR variations and altered expression of their genes and the risk of AA. Methods Blood samples of patients (60) suffering from AA as well as healthy subjects (60) were collected. Gene expression levels of MCP‐1 and MTHFR were evaluated by real‐time reverse‐transcription polymerase chain reaction analysis. Moreover, MCP‐1 rs1024611 (A‐2518G) and MTHFR rs1801133 (C677T) polymorphisms were genotyped by using polymerase chain reaction‐restriction fragment length polymorphism assays. Results In contrast to MCP‐1, the MTHFR gene expression was found to be significantly higher in patients than in controls. Further stratification of the patients revealed that polymorphic genotypes in MCP‐1 (AG + GG) and MTHFR (CT + TT) could significantly alter gene expression levels. Elevation of MCP‐1 expression was significantly associated with the total number of variant MCP‐1 and MTHFR alleles. However, no statistically significant difference was noticed in the genotypic distribution of MCP‐1 and MTHFR variations between patients and controls. Conclusion In summary, despite MCP‐1 rs1024611 and MTHFR rs1801133 variations are not associated with AA risk, they may implicate the disease pathogenesis by influencing MCP‐1 activity.
ISSN:2050-4527