On the Role of Inconsistency in Quantum Foundational Debate and Hilbert Space Formulation
This article is intended mainly to develop an expository outline of an inherently inconsistent reasoning in the development of quantum mechanics during 1920s, which set up the background of proposing different variants of quantum logic a bit later. We will discuss here two of the quantum logical va...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Quanta
2022-10-01
|
| Series: | Quanta |
| Online Access: | https://dankogeorgiev.com/ojs/index.php/quanta/article/view/68 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849686285031047168 |
|---|---|
| author | Debajyoti Gangopadhyay |
| author_facet | Debajyoti Gangopadhyay |
| author_sort | Debajyoti Gangopadhyay |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
This article is intended mainly to develop an expository outline of an inherently inconsistent reasoning in the development of quantum mechanics during 1920s, which set up the background of proposing different variants of quantum logic a bit later. We will discuss here two of the quantum logical variants with reference to Hilbert space formulation, based on the proposals of Bohr and Schrödinger as a result of addressing the same kernel of difficulties and will give a relative comparison. Our presentation is fairly informal, as our goal here is to simply sketch the central ideas leaving further details for other occasions.
Quanta 2022; 11: 28–41.
|
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-d243eb0adce144ff839f991fa22c1d7b |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 1314-7374 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2022-10-01 |
| publisher | Quanta |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Quanta |
| spelling | doaj-art-d243eb0adce144ff839f991fa22c1d7b2025-08-20T03:22:45ZengQuantaQuanta1314-73742022-10-011110.12743/quanta.v11i1.19568On the Role of Inconsistency in Quantum Foundational Debate and Hilbert Space FormulationDebajyoti Gangopadhyay0Transdisciplinary University, Bangalore This article is intended mainly to develop an expository outline of an inherently inconsistent reasoning in the development of quantum mechanics during 1920s, which set up the background of proposing different variants of quantum logic a bit later. We will discuss here two of the quantum logical variants with reference to Hilbert space formulation, based on the proposals of Bohr and Schrödinger as a result of addressing the same kernel of difficulties and will give a relative comparison. Our presentation is fairly informal, as our goal here is to simply sketch the central ideas leaving further details for other occasions. Quanta 2022; 11: 28–41. https://dankogeorgiev.com/ojs/index.php/quanta/article/view/68 |
| spellingShingle | Debajyoti Gangopadhyay On the Role of Inconsistency in Quantum Foundational Debate and Hilbert Space Formulation Quanta |
| title | On the Role of Inconsistency in Quantum Foundational Debate and Hilbert Space Formulation |
| title_full | On the Role of Inconsistency in Quantum Foundational Debate and Hilbert Space Formulation |
| title_fullStr | On the Role of Inconsistency in Quantum Foundational Debate and Hilbert Space Formulation |
| title_full_unstemmed | On the Role of Inconsistency in Quantum Foundational Debate and Hilbert Space Formulation |
| title_short | On the Role of Inconsistency in Quantum Foundational Debate and Hilbert Space Formulation |
| title_sort | on the role of inconsistency in quantum foundational debate and hilbert space formulation |
| url | https://dankogeorgiev.com/ojs/index.php/quanta/article/view/68 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT debajyotigangopadhyay ontheroleofinconsistencyinquantumfoundationaldebateandhilbertspaceformulation |