Humanities Research and Projectivity: Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Strategies of Knowledge

The paper makes a distinction between the methodological strategies of humanitarian disciplinary and interdisciplinary knowledge. It is alleged that the disciplinary structure of humanities is supported by a rigid connection between the objectivity of humanities and the research strategy of scholars...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: M.S. Kiseleva
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Kazan Federal University 2016-08-01
Series:Ученые записки Казанского университета: Серия Гуманитарные науки
Subjects:
Online Access:https://kpfu.ru/portal/docs/F297953933/158_4_gum_22.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846092824754257920
author M.S. Kiseleva
author_facet M.S. Kiseleva
author_sort M.S. Kiseleva
collection DOAJ
description The paper makes a distinction between the methodological strategies of humanitarian disciplinary and interdisciplinary knowledge. It is alleged that the disciplinary structure of humanities is supported by a rigid connection between the objectivity of humanities and the research strategy of scholars working in their discipline area. Modern humanitaristics will lose its status without maintaining the disciplinary structure. Interdisciplinarity also requires a different methodological strategy, which is defined as projective by the author. The author refers the area of its development to a special kind of research work, i.e., to creation of such a space, which can not be appropriated by any discipline, but being a projective field for expansion of meanings in understanding the variety of possibilities of spatial and temporal conditions of humans, culture, and society. The author shows the complexity and contradictions of the coexistence of these two strategies in the choice and justification of interdisciplinary communication language, practices of interdisciplinary growth strategies development, financing of interdisciplinary projects, determining the status of interdisciplinarity in the disciplinary structure of humanities. The paper discusses the problems of modern training practices in disciplinary research and mastery of interdisciplinary strategies in the face of ongoing reforms in liberal education. Interdisciplinary projective activity, according to the author, stimulates the development of educational digital technologies and multiplicates the forms and types of humanistic communication, which makes it attractive to the new generation of humanities scholars.
format Article
id doaj-art-d23d94507efb43d2a0b2514aa4c0de74
institution Kabale University
issn 2541-7738
2500-2171
language English
publishDate 2016-08-01
publisher Kazan Federal University
record_format Article
series Ученые записки Казанского университета: Серия Гуманитарные науки
spelling doaj-art-d23d94507efb43d2a0b2514aa4c0de742025-01-02T20:27:19ZengKazan Federal UniversityУченые записки Казанского университета: Серия Гуманитарные науки2541-77382500-21712016-08-01158411631172Humanities Research and Projectivity: Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Strategies of KnowledgeM.S. Kiseleva0Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 109240 RussiaThe paper makes a distinction between the methodological strategies of humanitarian disciplinary and interdisciplinary knowledge. It is alleged that the disciplinary structure of humanities is supported by a rigid connection between the objectivity of humanities and the research strategy of scholars working in their discipline area. Modern humanitaristics will lose its status without maintaining the disciplinary structure. Interdisciplinarity also requires a different methodological strategy, which is defined as projective by the author. The author refers the area of its development to a special kind of research work, i.e., to creation of such a space, which can not be appropriated by any discipline, but being a projective field for expansion of meanings in understanding the variety of possibilities of spatial and temporal conditions of humans, culture, and society. The author shows the complexity and contradictions of the coexistence of these two strategies in the choice and justification of interdisciplinary communication language, practices of interdisciplinary growth strategies development, financing of interdisciplinary projects, determining the status of interdisciplinarity in the disciplinary structure of humanities. The paper discusses the problems of modern training practices in disciplinary research and mastery of interdisciplinary strategies in the face of ongoing reforms in liberal education. Interdisciplinary projective activity, according to the author, stimulates the development of educational digital technologies and multiplicates the forms and types of humanistic communication, which makes it attractive to the new generation of humanities scholars.https://kpfu.ru/portal/docs/F297953933/158_4_gum_22.pdfdisciplinary and interdisciplinary knowledgeobjectivityprojectivityinvestigationmethodhumanitiesnew educational technologies
spellingShingle M.S. Kiseleva
Humanities Research and Projectivity: Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Strategies of Knowledge
Ученые записки Казанского университета: Серия Гуманитарные науки
disciplinary and interdisciplinary knowledge
objectivity
projectivity
investigation
method
humanities
new educational technologies
title Humanities Research and Projectivity: Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Strategies of Knowledge
title_full Humanities Research and Projectivity: Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Strategies of Knowledge
title_fullStr Humanities Research and Projectivity: Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Strategies of Knowledge
title_full_unstemmed Humanities Research and Projectivity: Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Strategies of Knowledge
title_short Humanities Research and Projectivity: Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Strategies of Knowledge
title_sort humanities research and projectivity disciplinary and interdisciplinary strategies of knowledge
topic disciplinary and interdisciplinary knowledge
objectivity
projectivity
investigation
method
humanities
new educational technologies
url https://kpfu.ru/portal/docs/F297953933/158_4_gum_22.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mskiseleva humanitiesresearchandprojectivitydisciplinaryandinterdisciplinarystrategiesofknowledge