Altered multisensory integration in pilots: Examining susceptibility to fission and fusion sound-induced flash illusions
Pilots show superior visual processing capabilities in many visual domain tasks. However, the extent to which this perceptual advantage extends to multisensory processing requires validation. In this study, we examined multisensory integration of auditory and visual information in both pilot and con...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2025-07-01
|
| Series: | i-Perception |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/20416695251364202 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849394021817909248 |
|---|---|
| author | Xing Peng Yaowei Liang Xiuyi Li Jiaying Sun Xiaoyu Tang Aijun Wang Chengyi Zeng |
| author_facet | Xing Peng Yaowei Liang Xiuyi Li Jiaying Sun Xiaoyu Tang Aijun Wang Chengyi Zeng |
| author_sort | Xing Peng |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Pilots show superior visual processing capabilities in many visual domain tasks. However, the extent to which this perceptual advantage extends to multisensory processing requires validation. In this study, we examined multisensory integration of auditory and visual information in both pilot and control groups, utilizing two sound-induced flash illusions (SIFI) tasks: the fission illusion, where one flash coupled with two beeps is perceived as two flashes; and the fusion illusion, where two flashes with a single beep are perceived as one flash. Sixty-six participants were instructed to discern whether they observed one or two flashes while discounting irrelevant auditory beeps, across six conditions: one flash (1F), two flashes (2F), one flash/one beep (1F1B), one flash/two beeps (1F2B), two flashes/one beep (2F1B), and two flashes/two beeps (2F2B). We varied six stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs) between auditory and visual events (25–150 ms) to assess the participants’ temporal binding window (TBW). Signal detection theory was employed to analyze the group differences in illusion reports. The findings suggest that, while pilots are less susceptible to SIFI in either fission or fusion conditions, they only exhibit narrower TBW in the fusion condition, where pilots demonstrated a more gradual change in their susceptibility as SOA increases. In the fission condition, the group difference was primarily driven by visual sensitivity, whereas in the fusion condition it also likely reflected pilots’ distinct multisensory integration mechanisms. Two alternative possibilities are discussed to explain the group differences and the different multisensory integration patterns in fission and fusion conditions. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-d225ff6123d74a589d500f3a9e8f296e |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2041-6695 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-07-01 |
| publisher | SAGE Publishing |
| record_format | Article |
| series | i-Perception |
| spelling | doaj-art-d225ff6123d74a589d500f3a9e8f296e2025-08-20T03:40:13ZengSAGE Publishingi-Perception2041-66952025-07-011610.1177/20416695251364202Altered multisensory integration in pilots: Examining susceptibility to fission and fusion sound-induced flash illusionsXing PengYaowei LiangXiuyi LiJiaying SunXiaoyu TangAijun WangChengyi ZengPilots show superior visual processing capabilities in many visual domain tasks. However, the extent to which this perceptual advantage extends to multisensory processing requires validation. In this study, we examined multisensory integration of auditory and visual information in both pilot and control groups, utilizing two sound-induced flash illusions (SIFI) tasks: the fission illusion, where one flash coupled with two beeps is perceived as two flashes; and the fusion illusion, where two flashes with a single beep are perceived as one flash. Sixty-six participants were instructed to discern whether they observed one or two flashes while discounting irrelevant auditory beeps, across six conditions: one flash (1F), two flashes (2F), one flash/one beep (1F1B), one flash/two beeps (1F2B), two flashes/one beep (2F1B), and two flashes/two beeps (2F2B). We varied six stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs) between auditory and visual events (25–150 ms) to assess the participants’ temporal binding window (TBW). Signal detection theory was employed to analyze the group differences in illusion reports. The findings suggest that, while pilots are less susceptible to SIFI in either fission or fusion conditions, they only exhibit narrower TBW in the fusion condition, where pilots demonstrated a more gradual change in their susceptibility as SOA increases. In the fission condition, the group difference was primarily driven by visual sensitivity, whereas in the fusion condition it also likely reflected pilots’ distinct multisensory integration mechanisms. Two alternative possibilities are discussed to explain the group differences and the different multisensory integration patterns in fission and fusion conditions.https://doi.org/10.1177/20416695251364202 |
| spellingShingle | Xing Peng Yaowei Liang Xiuyi Li Jiaying Sun Xiaoyu Tang Aijun Wang Chengyi Zeng Altered multisensory integration in pilots: Examining susceptibility to fission and fusion sound-induced flash illusions i-Perception |
| title | Altered multisensory integration in pilots: Examining susceptibility to fission and fusion sound-induced flash illusions |
| title_full | Altered multisensory integration in pilots: Examining susceptibility to fission and fusion sound-induced flash illusions |
| title_fullStr | Altered multisensory integration in pilots: Examining susceptibility to fission and fusion sound-induced flash illusions |
| title_full_unstemmed | Altered multisensory integration in pilots: Examining susceptibility to fission and fusion sound-induced flash illusions |
| title_short | Altered multisensory integration in pilots: Examining susceptibility to fission and fusion sound-induced flash illusions |
| title_sort | altered multisensory integration in pilots examining susceptibility to fission and fusion sound induced flash illusions |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1177/20416695251364202 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT xingpeng alteredmultisensoryintegrationinpilotsexaminingsusceptibilitytofissionandfusionsoundinducedflashillusions AT yaoweiliang alteredmultisensoryintegrationinpilotsexaminingsusceptibilitytofissionandfusionsoundinducedflashillusions AT xiuyili alteredmultisensoryintegrationinpilotsexaminingsusceptibilitytofissionandfusionsoundinducedflashillusions AT jiayingsun alteredmultisensoryintegrationinpilotsexaminingsusceptibilitytofissionandfusionsoundinducedflashillusions AT xiaoyutang alteredmultisensoryintegrationinpilotsexaminingsusceptibilitytofissionandfusionsoundinducedflashillusions AT aijunwang alteredmultisensoryintegrationinpilotsexaminingsusceptibilitytofissionandfusionsoundinducedflashillusions AT chengyizeng alteredmultisensoryintegrationinpilotsexaminingsusceptibilitytofissionandfusionsoundinducedflashillusions |