A Decision-Making Model for the Assessment of Emergency Response Capacity in China

Natural disasters and emergencies continue to increase in frequency and severity worldwide, necessitating robust emergency management (EM) systems and evaluation methodologies. This study addresses critical gaps in current emergency response capacity (ERC) evaluation frameworks by developing a compr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Guanyu Chen, Tao Li, Liguo Fei
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-05-01
Series:Mathematics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/11/1772
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849722561734115328
author Guanyu Chen
Tao Li
Liguo Fei
author_facet Guanyu Chen
Tao Li
Liguo Fei
author_sort Guanyu Chen
collection DOAJ
description Natural disasters and emergencies continue to increase in frequency and severity worldwide, necessitating robust emergency management (EM) systems and evaluation methodologies. This study addresses critical gaps in current emergency response capacity (ERC) evaluation frameworks by developing a comprehensive quantitative decision-making model to assess ERC more effectively. This research constructs a systematic ERC assessment framework based on the four phases of the disaster management cycle (DMC): prevention, preparedness, response, and recovery. The methodology employs multi-criteria decision analysis to evaluate ERC using three distinct information representation environments: intuitionistic fuzzy (IF) sets, linguistic variables (LV), and a novel mixed IF-LV environment. For each environment, we derive appropriate aggregation operators, weight determination methods, and information fusion mechanisms. The proposed model was empirically validated through a case application to emergency plan selection in Shenzhen, China. A statistical analysis of results demonstrates high consistency across all three decision environments (IF, LV, and mixed IF-LV), confirming the model’s robustness and reliability. A sensitivity analysis of key parameters further validates the model’s stability. Results indicate that the proposed decision-making approach provides significant value for EM by enabling more objective, comprehensive, and flexible ERC assessment. The indicator system and evaluation methodology offer decision-makers (DMs) tools to quantitatively analyze ERC using various information expressions, accommodating both subjective judgments and objective metrics. This framework represents an important advancement in emergency preparedness assessment, supporting more informed decision-making in emergency planning and response capabilities.
format Article
id doaj-art-d1f6c263401f4a1ea46ad1d4090b3eb6
institution DOAJ
issn 2227-7390
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Mathematics
spelling doaj-art-d1f6c263401f4a1ea46ad1d4090b3eb62025-08-20T03:11:19ZengMDPI AGMathematics2227-73902025-05-011311177210.3390/math13111772A Decision-Making Model for the Assessment of Emergency Response Capacity in ChinaGuanyu Chen0Tao Li1Liguo Fei2School of Public Affairs, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, ChinaSmart State Governance Lab, Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, ChinaSmart State Governance Lab, Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, ChinaNatural disasters and emergencies continue to increase in frequency and severity worldwide, necessitating robust emergency management (EM) systems and evaluation methodologies. This study addresses critical gaps in current emergency response capacity (ERC) evaluation frameworks by developing a comprehensive quantitative decision-making model to assess ERC more effectively. This research constructs a systematic ERC assessment framework based on the four phases of the disaster management cycle (DMC): prevention, preparedness, response, and recovery. The methodology employs multi-criteria decision analysis to evaluate ERC using three distinct information representation environments: intuitionistic fuzzy (IF) sets, linguistic variables (LV), and a novel mixed IF-LV environment. For each environment, we derive appropriate aggregation operators, weight determination methods, and information fusion mechanisms. The proposed model was empirically validated through a case application to emergency plan selection in Shenzhen, China. A statistical analysis of results demonstrates high consistency across all three decision environments (IF, LV, and mixed IF-LV), confirming the model’s robustness and reliability. A sensitivity analysis of key parameters further validates the model’s stability. Results indicate that the proposed decision-making approach provides significant value for EM by enabling more objective, comprehensive, and flexible ERC assessment. The indicator system and evaluation methodology offer decision-makers (DMs) tools to quantitatively analyze ERC using various information expressions, accommodating both subjective judgments and objective metrics. This framework represents an important advancement in emergency preparedness assessment, supporting more informed decision-making in emergency planning and response capabilities.https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/11/1772emergency response capacityemergency managementintegrated assessmentmixed informationMADM
spellingShingle Guanyu Chen
Tao Li
Liguo Fei
A Decision-Making Model for the Assessment of Emergency Response Capacity in China
Mathematics
emergency response capacity
emergency management
integrated assessment
mixed information
MADM
title A Decision-Making Model for the Assessment of Emergency Response Capacity in China
title_full A Decision-Making Model for the Assessment of Emergency Response Capacity in China
title_fullStr A Decision-Making Model for the Assessment of Emergency Response Capacity in China
title_full_unstemmed A Decision-Making Model for the Assessment of Emergency Response Capacity in China
title_short A Decision-Making Model for the Assessment of Emergency Response Capacity in China
title_sort decision making model for the assessment of emergency response capacity in china
topic emergency response capacity
emergency management
integrated assessment
mixed information
MADM
url https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/11/1772
work_keys_str_mv AT guanyuchen adecisionmakingmodelfortheassessmentofemergencyresponsecapacityinchina
AT taoli adecisionmakingmodelfortheassessmentofemergencyresponsecapacityinchina
AT liguofei adecisionmakingmodelfortheassessmentofemergencyresponsecapacityinchina
AT guanyuchen decisionmakingmodelfortheassessmentofemergencyresponsecapacityinchina
AT taoli decisionmakingmodelfortheassessmentofemergencyresponsecapacityinchina
AT liguofei decisionmakingmodelfortheassessmentofemergencyresponsecapacityinchina