Interobserver variability in organ delineation on radiotherapy treatment planning for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A dosimetric and prognostic analysis

Background and purposeThis study aimed to analyze the impact of interobserver variability (IOV) on clinical dosimetry and prognosis, specifically investigating the correlation between IOV and clinical prognosis in the context of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for nasopharyngeal carcino...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Meining Chen, Yinglin Peng, Ruotong Chen, Qiuying Xie, Dengyuan Chen, Jinping Shi, Rong Huang, Jun Zhang, Chong Zhao, Li Chen, Xiaowu Deng, Yimei Liu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-05-01
Series:Frontiers in Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2025.1510568/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background and purposeThis study aimed to analyze the impact of interobserver variability (IOV) on clinical dosimetry and prognosis, specifically investigating the correlation between IOV and clinical prognosis in the context of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).Materials and methodsTwelve NPC patients who underwent IMRT were selected. Four radiotherapy physicians from two different-tier cancer centers independently delineated target volumes and organs at risk (OARs) for each patient. These delineations were compared against gold standard structures from a regional cancer center. The IOV among physicians and its effect on clinical and prognosis were analyzed. The relationships between the IOV, dosimetry, and prognosis were investigated using spearman’s correlation analysis.ResultsThe target volume and OARs delineation differed significantly among physicians. This variability led to reduced prescription dose coverage (PDC) of the planning target volume (PTV) and increased doses to OARs, impacting tumor control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP). Compared to standard delineations, all four physicians showed decreased TCPs (average decrease in ΔTCP >1%) and a significant increase in NTCPs of OARs. The relative volume difference (ΔV) of target volumes correlated strongly with ΔPDC (R=0.686) and ΔTCP (R=0.703). Moreover, in the validation set, ΔV also strongly correlated with ΔTCP (R = 0.778).ConclusionSubstantial IOV in delineating NPC target volumes and OARs for IMRT was observed. This variability affects plan optimization, dose distribution, and clinical prognosis. ΔV can serve as a risk predictor for assessing delineation variability in NPC radiotherapy treatment planning.
ISSN:2234-943X