Physically Active Adults with Low Back Pain do not Demonstrate Altered Deadlift Mechanics: A Novel Application of Myotonometry to Estimate Inter-Muscular Load Sharing

# Background Rehabilitation clinicians that work with physically active populations are challenged with how to safely return patients back to performing deadlift movements following low back injury. Application of reliable and valid tests and measures to quantify impairments related to low back pai...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jared M. McGowen, Stephanie R. Albin, Carrie W. Hoppes, Jeffrey S. Forsse, John Abt, Shane L. Koppenhaver
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: North American Sports Medicine Institute 2024-01-01
Series:International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.90707
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1825197045917417472
author Jared M. McGowen
Stephanie R. Albin
Carrie W. Hoppes
Jeffrey S. Forsse
John Abt
Shane L. Koppenhaver
author_facet Jared M. McGowen
Stephanie R. Albin
Carrie W. Hoppes
Jeffrey S. Forsse
John Abt
Shane L. Koppenhaver
author_sort Jared M. McGowen
collection DOAJ
description # Background Rehabilitation clinicians that work with physically active populations are challenged with how to safely return patients back to performing deadlift movements following low back injury. Application of reliable and valid tests and measures to quantify impairments related to low back pain (LBP) enhances clinical decision making and may affect outcomes. Myotonometry is a non-invasive method to assess muscle stiffness which has demonstrated significant associations with physical performance and musculoskeletal injury. # Hypothesis/Purpose The purpose of this study was to compare the stiffness of trunk (lumbar multifidus \[LM\] and longissimus thoracis \[LT\]) and lower extremity (vastus lateralis \[VL\] and biceps femoris \[BF\]) muscles between individuals with and without LBP during the lying, standing, and deadlifting body positions. # Study Design Cross-sectional cohort comparison # Methods Muscle stiffness measures were collected in the VL, BF, LM, and LT muscles with participants in lying (supine and prone), standing, and the trap bar deadlift position. Separate analyses of covariance were conducted to compare absolute and relative muscle stiffness between the groups for each muscle and condition. # Results Sixty-eight participants (41 female, 21.3 years, 34 LBP) volunteered for the study. Within the deadlift condition there was a significantly greater increase in the percent-muscle stiffness change in the VL (*p* = .029, 21.9%) and BF (*p* = .024, 11.2%) muscles in the control group than in the LBP group. There were no differences in percent-muscle stiffness changes for the standing condition nor were there any absolute muscle stiffness differences between the two groups for the three conditions. # Conclusion No differences in muscle stiffness were identified in the lying, standing, or deadlifting conditions between participants with and without LBP. Differences in percent stiffness changes were noted between groups for the deadlift position, however the differences were modest and within measurement error. Future studies should investigate the utility of myotonometry as a method to identify LBP-related impairments that contribute to chronic and/or recurrent low back injury. # Level of Evidence Level 3
format Article
id doaj-art-d1d52be95b394d198fe93780cb2afb7d
institution Kabale University
issn 2159-2896
language English
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher North American Sports Medicine Institute
record_format Article
series International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
spelling doaj-art-d1d52be95b394d198fe93780cb2afb7d2025-02-11T20:27:41ZengNorth American Sports Medicine InstituteInternational Journal of Sports Physical Therapy2159-28962024-01-01191Physically Active Adults with Low Back Pain do not Demonstrate Altered Deadlift Mechanics: A Novel Application of Myotonometry to Estimate Inter-Muscular Load SharingJared M. McGowenStephanie R. AlbinCarrie W. HoppesJeffrey S. ForsseJohn AbtShane L. Koppenhaver# Background Rehabilitation clinicians that work with physically active populations are challenged with how to safely return patients back to performing deadlift movements following low back injury. Application of reliable and valid tests and measures to quantify impairments related to low back pain (LBP) enhances clinical decision making and may affect outcomes. Myotonometry is a non-invasive method to assess muscle stiffness which has demonstrated significant associations with physical performance and musculoskeletal injury. # Hypothesis/Purpose The purpose of this study was to compare the stiffness of trunk (lumbar multifidus \[LM\] and longissimus thoracis \[LT\]) and lower extremity (vastus lateralis \[VL\] and biceps femoris \[BF\]) muscles between individuals with and without LBP during the lying, standing, and deadlifting body positions. # Study Design Cross-sectional cohort comparison # Methods Muscle stiffness measures were collected in the VL, BF, LM, and LT muscles with participants in lying (supine and prone), standing, and the trap bar deadlift position. Separate analyses of covariance were conducted to compare absolute and relative muscle stiffness between the groups for each muscle and condition. # Results Sixty-eight participants (41 female, 21.3 years, 34 LBP) volunteered for the study. Within the deadlift condition there was a significantly greater increase in the percent-muscle stiffness change in the VL (*p* = .029, 21.9%) and BF (*p* = .024, 11.2%) muscles in the control group than in the LBP group. There were no differences in percent-muscle stiffness changes for the standing condition nor were there any absolute muscle stiffness differences between the two groups for the three conditions. # Conclusion No differences in muscle stiffness were identified in the lying, standing, or deadlifting conditions between participants with and without LBP. Differences in percent stiffness changes were noted between groups for the deadlift position, however the differences were modest and within measurement error. Future studies should investigate the utility of myotonometry as a method to identify LBP-related impairments that contribute to chronic and/or recurrent low back injury. # Level of Evidence Level 3https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.90707
spellingShingle Jared M. McGowen
Stephanie R. Albin
Carrie W. Hoppes
Jeffrey S. Forsse
John Abt
Shane L. Koppenhaver
Physically Active Adults with Low Back Pain do not Demonstrate Altered Deadlift Mechanics: A Novel Application of Myotonometry to Estimate Inter-Muscular Load Sharing
International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
title Physically Active Adults with Low Back Pain do not Demonstrate Altered Deadlift Mechanics: A Novel Application of Myotonometry to Estimate Inter-Muscular Load Sharing
title_full Physically Active Adults with Low Back Pain do not Demonstrate Altered Deadlift Mechanics: A Novel Application of Myotonometry to Estimate Inter-Muscular Load Sharing
title_fullStr Physically Active Adults with Low Back Pain do not Demonstrate Altered Deadlift Mechanics: A Novel Application of Myotonometry to Estimate Inter-Muscular Load Sharing
title_full_unstemmed Physically Active Adults with Low Back Pain do not Demonstrate Altered Deadlift Mechanics: A Novel Application of Myotonometry to Estimate Inter-Muscular Load Sharing
title_short Physically Active Adults with Low Back Pain do not Demonstrate Altered Deadlift Mechanics: A Novel Application of Myotonometry to Estimate Inter-Muscular Load Sharing
title_sort physically active adults with low back pain do not demonstrate altered deadlift mechanics a novel application of myotonometry to estimate inter muscular load sharing
url https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.90707
work_keys_str_mv AT jaredmmcgowen physicallyactiveadultswithlowbackpaindonotdemonstratealtereddeadliftmechanicsanovelapplicationofmyotonometrytoestimateintermuscularloadsharing
AT stephanieralbin physicallyactiveadultswithlowbackpaindonotdemonstratealtereddeadliftmechanicsanovelapplicationofmyotonometrytoestimateintermuscularloadsharing
AT carriewhoppes physicallyactiveadultswithlowbackpaindonotdemonstratealtereddeadliftmechanicsanovelapplicationofmyotonometrytoestimateintermuscularloadsharing
AT jeffreysforsse physicallyactiveadultswithlowbackpaindonotdemonstratealtereddeadliftmechanicsanovelapplicationofmyotonometrytoestimateintermuscularloadsharing
AT johnabt physicallyactiveadultswithlowbackpaindonotdemonstratealtereddeadliftmechanicsanovelapplicationofmyotonometrytoestimateintermuscularloadsharing
AT shanelkoppenhaver physicallyactiveadultswithlowbackpaindonotdemonstratealtereddeadliftmechanicsanovelapplicationofmyotonometrytoestimateintermuscularloadsharing